Disaggregation of Environmental Factors Affecting Sewer Pipe Failures
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 5, Issue 4
Abstract
This paper documents the development, calibration, and evaluation of a novel simulation model for understanding and predicting failures of wastewater pipe systems. The model is presented and subsequently calibrated and evaluated, within the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation framework, against a historical record of pipe failures in the Newcastle region. It is shown that the model has significant utility in many aspects of the operational management of the pipe system by providing a framework for disaggregation of the multiple environmental factors that contribute to the overall failure rate. The disaggregation is achieved within an uncertainty framework, thus providing quantified uncertainty estimates. Such analysis will be of significant use in life cycle analyses and costing of networks, and hence in optimizing replacement strategies, as well as in the assessment of regulatory compliance. Additionally, it is argued that the developed model can provide a rigorous basis for real-time forecasting of major trends in system failures through coupling to ENSO phenomena forecasts, thus providing valuable managerial insight into periods of expected high repair/replacement costs, to which current practice is largely reactive.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Beven, K. J., and Binley, A. M. (1992). “The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction.” Hydrological Processes, 6, 279–298.
2.
Box, G. E. P., and Tiao, G. C. (1973). Bayesian inference in statistical analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
3.
Burn, L. S., Tucker, S. N., and Lu, J. P. ( 1998). “Optimisation of pipeline rehabilitation schemes.” Rehabilitation of structures, D. W. S. Ho, I. Godson, and F. Collins, eds., Melbourne, Australia.
4.
Cantle, H. E., and Moelle, K. H. R. (1991). “Performance of the Newcastle water supply system since the 1989 earthquake.” Tech. Note, Hunter Water Corporation, Newcastle, Australia.
5.
Chappell, N. A., Franks, S. W., and Larenus, J. (1998). “Multi-scale permeability estimation in a tropical catchment.” Hydrological Processes, 12(9), 1507–1523.
6.
Franks, S. W. (1998a). “Rainfall variability in the Williams River catchment: preliminary investigation of the effects of the Southern Oscillation and the implications for land and water resource management in the Hunter region.” Dept. of Civ., Surv., and Envir. Engrg. Res. Rep. No. 163.04.1998, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
7.
Franks, S. W. (1998b). “An evaluation of single and multiple objective SVAT model conditioning schemes: parametric, predictive, and extrapolative uncertainty.” Dept. of Civ., Surv., and Envir. Engrg. Res. Rep. No. 167.09.1998, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
8.
Franks, S. W. (1998c). “On the development and utility of conceptual representations for modelling wastewater pipe system failures (sewer surcharges).” Dept. of Civ., Surv., and Envir. Engrg. Res. Rep. No. 169.09.1998, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
9.
Franks, S. W., and Beven, K. J. (1997). “Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in land surface–atmosphere flux predictions.” J. Geophys. Res., D20, 23,991–23,999.
10.
Franks, S. W., Beven, K. J., Chappell, N. A., and Gineste, Ph. (1997a). “The utility of multi-objective conditioning of a distributed hydrological model using uncertain estimates of saturated areas.” Proc., Int. Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM '97), A. D. McDonald and M. McAleer, eds., Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia, Canberra, Australia, 335–340.
11.
Franks, S. W., Beven, K. J., Quinn, P. F., and Wright, I. R. (1997b). “On the sensitivity of soil vegetation–atmosphere transfer (SVAT) schemes: equifinality and the problem of robust calibration.” Agric. and Forest Meteorol., 86, 63–75.
12.
Franks, S. W., Gineste, P., Beven, K. J., and Merot, P. (1998). “On constraining the predictions of a distributed model: the incorporation of fuzzy estimates of saturated areas into the calibration process.” Water Resour. Res., 34(4), 787–797.
13.
Franks, S. W., and Stewart, M. G. (1998). “Development of integrated life cycle costing for infrastructure asset management: integrated economic decision analysis (IEDA).” Dept. of Civ., Surv., and Envir. Engrg. Res. Rep. No. 171.10.1998, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
14.
Freer, J., Ambroise, B., and Beven, K. J. (1996). “Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: an application of the GLUE approach.” Water Resour. Res., 32(7), 2161–2173.
15.
Romanowicz, R., Beven, K. J., and Tawn, J. ( 1996). “Bayesian calibration of flood inundation models.” Floodplain processes, M. G. Anderson, D. E. Walling, and P. D. Bates, eds., Wiley, Chichester.
16.
Spear, R. C., and Hornberger, G. M. (1980). “Eutrophication in Peel Inlet. II: Identification of critical uncertainties via generalized sensitivity analysis.” Water Res., 14, 43–49.
17.
Zak, S., Beven, K. J., and Reynolds, B. (1997). “Uncertainty in the estimation of critical loads: a practical methodology.” Soil, Water, and Air Pollution, 98, 297–316.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 5 • Issue 4 • December 1999
Pages: 150 - 158
History
Received: Jul 6, 1999
Published online: Dec 1, 1999
Published in print: Dec 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.