Seismic Retrofit Program for Los Angeles Bridges
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 4, Issue 4
Abstract
This paper details the work of the recent Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program for the city of Los Angeles. We describe the scope of the work completed and project funding through local and federal sources. The criteria used for the categorization of a bridge as a historical structure is explained, and the subsequent funding and design impacts are detailed. Methods of prioritizing the bridge retrofits using a weighted formula based on replacement cost, condition of the bridge, bridge traffic, and age of the structure are introduced. The engineering solutions to the typical bridge seismic deficiencies of loss of support at the rocker bearings and expansion hinges, column failures, failures of pier walls, foundation failures, and abutment failures are all reviewed. We summarize the bridge construction program history and progress. The work done to one bridge, the Cesar Chavez Bridge, is detailed to illustrate a representative project within the program. Our conclusions identify the successes and shortcomings of this major infrastructure improvement program.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Arditi, D. A., and Messiha, H. M.(1995). “Life-cycle costing in municipal construction projects.”J. Infrastruct. Sys., ASCE, 2(1), 5–14.
2.
Chamberlin, W. P. (1983). “Historic bridges—Criteria for decision making”Nat. Cooperative Hwy. Res. Program Rep. 101, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
3.
Chouinard, L. E., Anderson, G. R., and Torrey III, V. H.(1996). “Ranking models used for condition assessment of civil infrastructure systems.”J. Infrastruct. Sys., ASCE, 2(1), 23–29.
4.
“Draft environmental impact report—Macy Street Bridge.” (1993). Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering, Environmental Management Section, Los Angeles.
5.
Fwa, T. F., and Chan, W. T.(1993). “Priority rating of highway maintenance needs by neural networks.”J. Transp. Engrg., 119(3), 419–432.
6.
Hudson, R. W., Carmichael III, R. F., Hudson, S. W., Diaz, M. A., and Moser, L. O. (1993). “Microcomputer bridge management system.”J. Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 119(1) 59–76.
7.
Khasnabis, S., and Chaudhry, B. B.(1994). “Prioritizing transit markets using analytic hierarchy process.”J. Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 120(1), 74–93.
8.
Klaiber, F. W., Dunker, K. F., Wipf, T. J., and Sanders Jr., W. W. (1987). “Methods of strengthening existing highway bridges.”Nat. Cooperative Hwy. Res. Program Rep. 293, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
9.
Lee, P. (1995). “Seismic retrofit of Macy Street Bridge—Finding of adverse effect”WO#E6000380 Seismic Retrofit Rep., Los Angeles, Bureau of Engineering, Los Angeles.
10.
Lim, C. L. (1993). “Seismic retrofit of Macy Street Bridge over Los Angeles River.”Draft Concept Rep., Los Angeles, Department of Public Works, Los Angeles.
11.
Ravirala, V., and Grivas, D. A.(1995). “State increment method of life-cycle cost analysis for highway management.”J. Infrastruct. Sys., ASCE, 1(3), 151–159.
12.
Ross, C. L., and Davis, W. J.(1996). “Multijurisdictional project evaluation in Chattanooga urban area.”J. Urban Plng. and Devel., ASCE, 122(2), 71–81.
13.
Sirajuddin, A. M. Y. (1998). “Highway maintenance fund allocation: Tabulated manual procedure.”J. Transp. Engrg., ASCE 123(5), 346–349.
14.
Veshosky, D., and Beidleman, C. R.(1992). “Life-cycle cost analysis doesn't work for bridges.”Civ. Engrg., ASCE, 62(7), 6.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Dec 1, 1998
Published in print: Dec 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.