Integration of Bridge Management Systems and Nondestructive Evaluations
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 4, Issue 2
Abstract
A basis for the direct use of data from nondestructive evaluation methods in bridge management systems is presented. Bridge management systems use integer-valued condition ratings to recognize conditions of bridge elements, to model progression of deterioration in elements and to determine needs for maintenance and repair. In an ongoing research project funded by the U.S. Federal Highway Administration, procedures are being developed to communicate data from quantitative nondestructive evaluation methods to bridge management systems. Data from nondestructive evaluation methods can inform management systems on the extent of damage, on the initiation of deterioration processes and on the exposure of bridge elements to aggressive agents. In addition, data obtained through nondestructive evaluation allow the formation of models of specific deterioration processes in bridges. The use of these data in bridge management systems requires redefinition of condition ratings together with the creation of procedures for automated interpretation of the data. By these actions, nondestructive evaluation methods are used directly to assign condition ratings, and condition ratings are made into a terse report of nondestructive evaluation data that are compatible with management systems. This paper reports work in progress to integrate nondestructive evaluation methods and bridge management systems.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Abed-Al-Rahim, J. J., and Johnston, D. W. (1991). “Analysis of relationships affecting bridge deterioration and improvement.”Rep. NC/R&D/93-001, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, N.C.
2.
Busa, G. D., Cassella, M. A., Gazda, W. A., and Horn, R. J. (1985). “A national bridge deterioration model.”Rep. SS-42-U5-26, USDOT Transp. Res. Ctr., Cambridge, Mass.
3.
Hearn, G., and Shim, H. (1997). “Integration of nondestructive testing and bridge management systems: Task A report.” Rep. for Fed. Hwy. Admin.
4.
Hearn, G., Frangopol, D. M., and Szanyi, T. (1995a). “Bridge management practices in the United States.” Rep. for Fed. Hwy. Admin., Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, Colo.
5.
Manual for condition evaluation of bridges. (1994). AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
6.
Pontis release 3.0 user's manual. (1995). AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
7.
Recording and coding guide of the structure inventory and appraisal of the nations bridges. (1988). Fed. Hwy. Admin., Washington, D.C.
8.
Veshosky, D., Beidleman, C. R., Buctow, G. W., and Demir, M.(1994). “Comparative analysis of bridge superstructure deterioration.”J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 120(7), 2123–2136.
9.
Whiting, D., Ost, B., Nagi, M., and Cady, P. D. (1992). “Condition evaluation of concrete bridges relative to reinforcement corrosion. Vol. 5: Method for evaluating the effectiveness of penetrating sealers.”Rep. SHRP/S/FR-92/107, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jun 1, 1998
Published in print: Jun 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.