Research as a Means for Improving Infrastructure
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 1, Issue 1
Abstract
Research is a conscious and directed effort to increase understanding and discover new and better ways to achieve goals. Leading economists attribute a major share of the nation's economic growth since World War II to the results of scientific and engineering research and development (R & D) activities. Available evidence indicates that U.S. R & D spending for infrastructure is low, compared to the benefits that might be gained from improved infrastructure technology, as well as to spending rates in other sectors of the economy and in other industrialized nations. Several recent studies have proposed high-priority topics where greater R & D effort could yield substantial dividends. Some federal agencies and private-sector initiatives indicate that infrastructure R & D spending on these topics could increase. However, transfer of research results into practice is essential to justify such spending.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
America's highways: accelerating the search for innovation. (1984). Transp. Res. Board, Washington, D.C.
2.
Civil Engineering Research Foundation (CERF). (1991a). “Setting a national research agenda for the civil engineering profession.”Rep., Vols. 1 and 2, Washington, D.C.
3.
Civil Engineering Research Foundation (CERF). (1991b). “Transferring research into practice: lessons from Japan's construction industry.”Rep., Washington, D.C.
4.
Civil Engineering Research Foundation (CERF). (1993a). “Federal public works infrastructure R & D: a new perspective.”Rep. No. 93-EF1003, Washington, D.C.
5.
Civil Engineering Research Foundation (CERF). (1993b). “High performance construction materials and systems: an essential program for America and its infrastructure: executive report.”Rep. No. 93-N5011.E, Washington, D.C.
6.
Civil Engineering Research Foundation (CERF). (1993c). “A nationwide survey of civil engineering-related R & D.”Rep. 93-5006, Washington, D.C.
7.
Civil Engineering Research Foundation (CERF). (1994a). “Constructed civil infrastructure systems R & D: a European perspective.”Rep. #94-5010, Washington, D.C.
8.
Civil Engineering Research Foundation (CERF). (1994b). “Geo-engineering: vision for the 21st century.”Rep. #94-5020, Washington, D.C.
9.
Bordognia, J.(1994). “Intelligent renewal keeps infrastructure civil.”Civ. Engrg., ASCE, 64(3), 6.
10.
Building Research Board. (1988). Building for tomorrow: global enterprise and the U.S. construction industry . National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
11.
Cohen, L. R., and Noll, R. G. (1992). “Research and development.” Setting domestic priorities, H. J. Aaron and C. L. Schultz, eds., The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.
12.
Dibner, D., and Lemer, A. (1992). The role of government agencies in fostering new technology and innovation in building . National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
13.
Institute for Water Resources. (1993). “Framing the dialogue: strategies issues, and opportunities.”IWR Rep. 93-FIS-1, Federal Infrastructure Strategy Program, Fort Belvoir, Va.
14.
In our own backyard: principles for improving the nation's infrastructure. (1993). A. Grant and A. Lemer, eds., National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
15.
Kline, K., and Rosenberg, N. (1986). “An overview of innovation.”The positive sum strategy: harnessing technology for economic growth, R. Landau and N. Rosenberg, eds., National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
16.
National Research Council, Committee on Infrastructure Innovation. (1987). Infrastructure for the 21st century: framework for a research agenda . National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
17.
National Council on Public Works Improvement. (1988). Fragile foundations: a report on America's public works . U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
18.
National Science Foundation (NSF). (1990). “Academic science and engineering: R & D expenditures.”Rep. NSF 90-327, Arlington, Va.
19.
National Science Foundation (NSF). (1992). “National patterns of R & D resources.”Rep. NSF 92-330, Washington, D.C.
20.
National Science Foundation (NSF). (1993). “Civil engineering systems research: strategic issues.”Rep. of the Strategic Task Group, NSF 93-5, Arlington, Va.
21.
Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). (1990). “Rebuilding the foundations: state and local public works financing and management.”Rep., U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
22.
Perspectives on urban infrastructure. (1984). R. Hanson, ed., National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
23.
Rosenberg, N., and Birdzell, L. E. Jr.(1990). “Science, technology and the Western miracle.”Scientific Am., 263(5), 42–54.
24.
Tarr, J. A., and Dupuy, G. (1988). Technology and the rise of the networked city in Europe and America . Temple Univ. Press, Philadelphia, Pa.
25.
National Research Council (NRC). (1985). Technological alternatives for urban infrastructure . J. P. Eberhard and A. B. Bernstein, eds., National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
26.
Toward infrastructure improvement: an agenda for research. (1994). J. Gould and A. Lemer, eds., National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
27.
U.S. Bureau of Census. (1991). Statistical abstract of the United States, 11th Ed., U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.
28.
“Washington observer.” (1993). Engrg. News Record, (Oct. 18), 7.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 1 • Issue 1 • March 1995
Pages: 6 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1995
Published in print: Mar 1995
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.