Uniform Infrastructure Fields: Definition and Identification
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 1, Issue 1
Abstract
The present paper addresses the problem of assessing infrastructure condition using detailed spatial distress data. A new understanding of the spatial behavior of infrastructure distress is presented, and a condition assessment methodology commensurate with the identified behavior is developed. Two deterioration mechanisms are identified. The environmental mechanism describes deterioration as a consequence of causal factors and exhibits both macroscopic and microscopic scales. The interactive mechanism describes deterioration as a result of distress at a location influencing the deterioration of neighboring locations and exhibits a microscopic scale. A nonstationary stochastic spatial model that captures both mechanisms is proposed. Based on this model, a methodology founded on nonparametric cluster analysis and dynamic programming is developed to identify uniformly behaving regions (referred to as fields) within which condition can be estimated accurately. The results of the application of the methodology to a 15-km-long highway facility demonstrate the validity of the spatial model and emphasize the need for correctly identifying the uniform fields.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures. (1986). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C.
2.
Ben-Akiva, M., Humplick, F., Madanat, S., and Ramaswamy, R.(1993). “Infrastructure management under uncertainty: latent performance approach.”J. Transp. Engrg., ASCE, 119(1), 43–58.
3.
Ben-Akiva, M., and Ramaswamy, R.(1993). “An approach for predicting latent infrastructure performance deterioration.”Transp. Sci., 27(2), 174–193.
4.
Cox, D. R., and Isham, V. (1980). Point processes . Chapman and Hall, London, England.
5.
Diggle, P.(1985). “A kernel method for smoothing point process data.”Appl. Statistics, 34(2), 138–147.
6.
Fisher, W. D.(1958). “On grouping for maximum homogeneity.”J. Am. Statistical Assoc., 53, 789–798.
7.
Hartigan, J. A. (1975). Clustering algorithms . John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
8.
Herrmann, H. J., and Roux, S. (1990). Statistical models for the fracture of disordered media . Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
9.
Humplick, F. (1992). “Highway pavement distress evaluation: modeling measurement error.”Transp. Res. B, 26B(2), 135–154.
10.
Maser, K., Bradenmeyer, B., and Littlefield, R. (1988). “Pavement condition diagnosis based on multisensor data.”Transp. Res. Record 1196, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 62–71.
11.
Mishalani, R. G. (1993). “Extracting spatial information on infrastructure distress using a stochastic modeling approach: application to highway maintenance decision making,” PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
12.
“Pavement condition evaluation: Mississippi State Highway Department.” (1992). Rep., PaveTech, Inc., Norman, Okla.
13.
“Pavement management data form.” (1992). Mississippi Department of Transportation, Jackson, Miss.
14.
Roddis, W. M. K., Maser, K., and Gist, A. (1992). “Radar pavement thickness evaluations for varying base conditions.”Transp. Res. Record 1355, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 90–98.
15.
Ross, S. M. (1983). Stochastic processes . John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
16.
Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis . Chapman and Hall, London, England.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1995
Published in print: Mar 1995
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.