Emergency Contracting Strategies for Federal Projects
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 134, Issue 4
Abstract
During the past decade, government agencies have struggled to adequately respond to emergency events that require labor, materials, equipment, and services provided by construction contractors. In fact, the criticism directed at government agencies during their response to, and recovery after, recent events is a testament to the insufficient contracting strategies that were implemented. Countless media headlines highlighted the fragmented approach used to hire contractors expeditiously, and several agencies were criticized for their inconsistent contracting methods. As a result, a study was initiated to investigate the differences between normal federal contracting procedures, as outlined in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), and emergency acquisition procedures that are permitted by the FAR. The study found six examples of waivers to the usual regulations or expedited contracting techniques permitted by the FAR. Furthermore, the study highlighted five emergency contract strategies that are available to the Navy (as one example of a government agency with contracting authority) and may be available to other governmental contracting authorities as well. Consequently, the purpose of this paper is to identify emergency contract strategies that can be used by government agencies and to outline the criteria that must be met to use each strategy.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Chua, D. K. H., and Loh, P. K. (2006). “CB-contract: Case-based reasoning approach to construction contract strategy formulation.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 20(5), 339–350.
Department of Commerce. (2007). “Small business prime contracting goals.” Small business procurement accomplishments & goals, ⟨http://www.osec.doc.gov/osdbu/Accomplishments.htm⟩ (Aug. 18, 2007).
Department of Defense (DoD). (2006). “Source selection procedures for the navy construction capabilities contract.” Rep. No. D-2006-061, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Federal Business Opportunities (FBO). (2007). “FedBizOpps.gov: Federal business opportunities.” ⟨http://www.fbo.gov/index?s=main&mode=list&tab=list⟩ (Aug. 17, 2007).
Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2006). “Agency management of contractors responding to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.” GAO-06-461R, Management of Katrina Contractors, Washington, D.C.
Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC). (1998). Contracting in emergency situations, Charleston, S.C.
Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC). (2000). NAVFAC P-68 contracting manual, Washington, D.C.
Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC). (2005). Strategic plan 2005-2011: Innovation leadership performance, Washington, D.C.
Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC). (2006). Naval facilities engineering command acquisition supplement NFAS, Washington, D.C.
Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC). (2007). “Navy contingency engineering.” SAME National Conference Proc., Society of American Military Engineers, Philadelphia.
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). (2007). Emergency acquisitions guide, Washington, D.C.
Palmer, K. (2005). “Relief efforts spawn quick contracts.” Government Executive.com, ⟨http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?filepath=/dailyfed/0905/090805k1.htm⟩ (Sept. 8, 2005).
United States House of Representatives. (2006). “Waste, fraud, and abuse in Hurricane Katrina contracts.” Committee on Government Reform—Minority Staff Special Investigations Division, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Witte, G., and Merle, R. (2005). “Government tries to balance scrutiny, speed.” Washington Post (Washington, D.C.), Sept. 15, D01.
Worthington, M., and Goldsman, L. (1998). Contracting with the federal government, 4th Ed., Wiley, New York.
Yung, K. (2005). “In making up for Katrina, critics say, agency spending wildly.” Dallas Morning News, Sept. 22.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 134 • Issue 4 • October 2008
Pages: 371 - 379
Copyright
© 2008 ASCE.
History
Received: Aug 20, 2007
Accepted: Nov 16, 2007
Published online: Oct 1, 2008
Published in print: Oct 2008
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.