Assessment of Communications and Collaborative Learning in Civil Engineering Education
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 127, Issue 4
Abstract
Recently, employers have indicated that they are not totally satisfied with the individualistic approach of the average engineering graduate. This may be due to the fact that, today, in many companies, team goals, team contributions, and team rewards often supersede individual actions. In fact, some authorities believe that the development of critical thinking, collaborative learning, communication, and leadership skills is vital for engineering programs, as well as for students. The findings of this study suggest that students have accepted the concept of collaborative teaching and learning. As an example, the evaluation of student-teaching presentations was found to be above average with scores greater than “B” for all categories. In addition, comments indicate that a course utilizing the concepts of collaborative learning and teamwork was interesting and informative and could be of assistance to respondents in future endeavors. Studies also indicate that undergraduates prefer classroom discussion and problem solving, group interaction, teamwork, and the opportunity for student input rather than formal lectures. Also, the results suggest students perceive that they have mastered communication skills in their civil engineering classwork. For comparative purposes, the findings of this investigation can be utilized by other institutions and departments that may wish to study their curriculum.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bert, R. ( 1999). “Around the world in 24 hours.” ASEE Prism, 8(7), 25–26.
2.
Black, K. M. ( 1994). “An industry view of engineering education.” J. Engrg. Educ., 83(1), 26–28.
3.
Budiansky, S. ( 1999). “A web of connections.” ASEE Prism, 8(7), 20–24.
4.
Criteria for accrediting programs in engineering in the United States. (1993). Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. (ABET).
5.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. (ABET), 〈http://www.abet.org/eac〉.
6.
Koehn, E. (1991). “An ethics and professionalism seminar in the civil engineering curriculum.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 117(2), 96–101.
7.
Koehn, E. (1995). “Interactive communication in civil engineering classrooms.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 121(4), 260–261.
8.
Koehn, E. (1997). “Engineering perceptions of ABET accreditation criteria.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 123(2), 66–70.
9.
Koehn, E. (1999). “Professional design component for civil engineering curriculum.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 125(2), 35–39.
10.
Koehn, E. (2000). “Professional program criteria for civil engineering curriculums.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 126(4), 174–179.
11.
Lovgren, R. H., and Racer, M. J. (2000). “Group dynamics in projects: Don't forget the social aspects.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 126(4), 156–165.
12.
Major, M. M. ( 1994). “Surviving the crunch.” ASEE Prism, 3(7), 14–19.
13.
McCuen, R. H. (1994). “Constructivist learning model for ethics education.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 120(3), 273–278.
14.
Palmer, S. R. (2000). “Student responses to activities designed to develop generic professional skills.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 126(4), 180–185.
15.
Weingardt, R. G. ( 1993). “Engineers need a broader perspective and a better image.” ASCE News, 18(6), 7–11.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Jul 25, 2000
Published online: Oct 1, 2001
Published in print: Oct 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.