Language Professionals in Engineering Faculty: Cross-Cultural Experience
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 126, Issue 1
Abstract
Communication courses are often given low priority by engineering students and faculty alike. This is mainly because they are perceived to be, and often are, divorced from the realities of the engineering world. Credible and relevant communication courses demand the integration of language and engineering content so that the tasks reflect the sort of problem solving that students will face in real-life engineering contexts. One problem that language specialists face in designing such courses arises from the fact that they hail from a discipline very different from engineering in purpose, subject matter, and pedagogical approach. To work effectively in the different “subculture” of engineering, they need to assimilate and attain the cultural literacy of the discipline. In our institution, the “acculturation” process of language specialists has been helped along by the fact that they are based in the engineering school. This provides greater opportunities for assimilation into the discipline and allows the interfacing of communication skills and civil engineering to take place more effectively. This paper describes how this setup has been instrumental in providing a communication course that students perceive to be relevant and therefore an integral part of their engineering studies.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Adams-Smith, D. E. ( 1979). “Bridging the gap between the E and the SP.” Team teaching in ESP, ELT Documents 106, British Council, 112–123.
2.
Bakos, J. D. (1986). “A department policy for developing communication skills of undergraduate engineers.” Engrg. Educ., 77(2), 101–104.
3.
Bakos, J. D. (1997). “Communication skills for the 21st century.”J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 123(1), 14–16.
4.
Ballard, B. ( 1984). “Improving students' writing: An integrated approach to cultural adjustment.” Common ground: Shared interests in ESP and communication studies. ELT Documents 117, Pergamon, Tarrytown, N.Y., 43–54.
5.
Barnam, C. (1982). “Teaching technical writing to the engineering student: Industry needs, students expectations.” IEEE Trans. on Profl. Communication, 25(3), 136–139.
6.
Chisman, S. A. (1987). “Helping students to speak and write.” Appl. J. Engrg. Educ., 3(2), 187–188.
7.
Early, P. B. ( 1981). “The ESP teacher's role: Implications for the “knower-client” relationship.” The ESP teacher: Role development and prospects, ELT Documents 112, British Council, 42–52.
8.
Katz, S. M. (1993). “The entry-level engineer: Problems in transition from student to professional.” J. Engrg. Educ., 82(3), 171–174.
9.
Lamb, B. C. (1994). A national survey of communication skills of young entrants to industry and commerce. The Queen's English Society, London.
10.
Mailloux, E. N. ( 1989). “Engineering information systems.” Annual review of information science and technology, M. E. Williams, ed., Vol. 25, 239–266.
11.
Tebeaux, E. (1985). “Redesigning professional courses to meet the communication needs of business and industry.” Coll. Composition and Communication, 30(4), 101–104.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 126 • Issue 1 • January 2000
Pages: 32 - 34
History
Received: Dec 8, 1997
Published online: Jan 1, 2000
Published in print: Jan 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.