Integrated Civil Engineering Curriculum: Implementation and Management
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 122, Issue 4
Abstract
Although improving the relevance of engineering education through integrated courses has been discussed extensively, less attention has been given to the differences encountered in managing integrated as opposed to more traditional curriculums. Our planning of a new curriculum provided an opportunity for such an examination. Implementation and management issues of Colorado State University's (CSU) four year undergraduate civil engineering curriculum are identified and discussed. These issues include coordination challenges in a large research department, accommodating transfer students, absorbing higher resource costs, defining small group laboratory experiences, recognizing the lack of resource materials for nontraditional courses, including knowledge not within knowledge domains of faculty, rescheduling existing courses to fit within the new curriculum, and preparing teachers for leading the new courses. The department expects to resolve these issues in the next two to three years, and a follow-up paper will describe the lessons learned for the benefit of departments trying to improve design instruction, while adding new material to an already overcrowded curriculum and retaining flexibility for students to graduate in four years. Meanwhile, the challenges in implementing the integrated curriculum should be of interest to those facing similar issues inside academia as well as to their advisors from government and industry.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
de Graff, E. (1995). “Curriculum innovation in engineering education.”Fourth World Conf. on Engrg. Educ., Technology Based Engineering Education, Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
2.
de Graff, E., and Bouhouijs, P. A. J., eds. (1993). Implementation of problem-based learning in higher education . Thesis Publishing, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
3.
“Engineering education in a changing world.” (1994). Rep. of Workshop Organized on February 24–25, 1995, ASEE Dean's Council, Washington, D.C.
4.
Engineering Programs Assessed. (1995). 235(9), 8–9.
5.
General Catalog. (1994). Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
6.
Hargraft, R. (1995). “A framework for our educational future.”Fourth World Conf. on Engrg. Educ., Technology Based Engineering Education, Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
7.
“Major issues in engineering education.” (1993). Working Paper of the Board on Engineering Education, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
8.
“Restructuring engineering education: a focus on change.” (1995). Rep. of an NSF Workshop on Engrg. Educ., 95-65, National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.
9.
Summary Rep. of Nat. Conf. on Civ. Engrg. Educ. (1995). ASCE, New York, N.Y.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Oct 1, 1996
Published in print: Oct 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.