Context for Writing in Engineering Curriculum
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 120, Issue 4
Abstract
An integrated approach to teaching technical writing requires a unified faculty commitment to improving student writing, student motivation, appropriate writing assignments, strong evaluation standards, and productive instruction techniques. Effective technical writing has certain distinguishing qualities: a clearly defined audience and purpose, careful organization and development of ideas, and a concise and accurate style. Students can best develop these qualities when writing assignments and instruction are presented in the realistic context of engineering problem solving. The writers advocate the collaborative development of student writing by both English and engineering faculties. In an effective collaborative program, all engineering instructors stress the importance of writing in engineering practice and in their evaluation of student writing assignments, while using effective teaching strategies like peer and self review of writing drafts, one‐to‐one conferencing, and portfolio evaluation.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bartholomae, D. (1984). “The study of error.” Rhetoric and composition: a sourcebook for teachers and writers, R. Graves, ed., Boyton/Cook, Upper Montclair, N.J., 311–327.
2.
Berkenkotter, C. (1984). “Understanding a writer's awareness of audience.” College composition and communication, 32(4), 388–399.
3.
Bishop, W. (1989). “Revising the technical writing class: peer critiques, self‐evaluation, and portfolios.” Tech. Writing Teacher, 16, 13–25.
4.
DiGaetani, J. (1989). “Use of the case method in teaching business communications.” Writing in the business professions, M. Kogen, ed., National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Ill., 187–201.
5.
Dorman, W., and Pruett, J. (1985). “Engineering better writers: why and how engineers can teach writing.” Engrg. Education, 75(7), 656–658.
6.
Ede, L., and Lunsford, A. (1984). “Audience addressed/audience invoked: the role of audience in composition theory and pedagogy.” College composition and communication, 35(2), 155–171.
7.
Flower, L. (1979). “Writer based prose: a cognitive basis of problems writing.” College English, 41(1), 19–37.
8.
Flower, L., and Hayes, J. (1984). “Problem‐solving strategies and the writing process.” Writing in the business professions, R. Graves, ed., National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Ill., 3–36.
9.
Gee, T. (1972). “Students responses to teacher comments.” Res. in the Teaching of English, 6(2), 212–221.
10.
Halliday, M., and Hasan, R. (1980). Text and context: aspects of language in sociosemiotic perspective. Longman Press, London, U.K.
11.
Harris, M. (1986). Teaching one‐to‐one: the writing conference. National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Ill.
12.
Hillocks, G., Jr. (1982). “The interaction of instruction, teacher comments, and revising in the composing process.” Res. in the Teaching of English, 16(3), 261–278.
13.
Kurfiss, J. (1988). “Critical thinking: Theory, research, practice, and possibilities.” ASHE‐ERIC Higher Education Rep. No. 2. Association for the Study of Higher Education, Washington, D.C.
14.
Perry, C. (1993). The fine art of technical writing. Blue Heron Publishing, Hillsboro, Oreg.
15.
Snell, L. (1990). “Teaching memo and letter writing techniques in the classroom.” Engrg. Education, 80(4), 481–482.
16.
Swanson, L., and Aboutorabi, H. (1990). “The technical memorandum: an effective way of developing technical writing skills.” Engrg. Education, 80(4), 479–481.
17.
Ware, E. (1988). “Helping students to prepare a technical communications portfolio.” Tech. Writing Teacher, 15, 56–62.
18.
Warren, T. (1990). “Mastering the fine art of writing reports for nonscientists.” The Scientist, 25, 27.
19.
White, E. (1989). Developing successful college writing programs. Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, Calif.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 120 • Issue 4 • October 1994
Pages: 392 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 1, 1992
Published online: Oct 1, 1994
Published in print: Oct 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.