TECHNICAL PAPERS
Apr 1, 1994

Environmental Collective Action: Residential Recycling Programs

Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 120, Issue 2

Abstract

Many civil and environmental engineering projects involve the amelioration of environmental problems. Attempts to avoid future and solve current environmental problems are more and more likely to include the inducement of behavior change on a wide scale. The attempts will involve individual‐level environmental collective actions: individual‐level, because they require widespread participation in particular individual behaviors; environmental, because they involve protecting, maintaining, or improving the physical environment; and collective action, because they involve the production of collective goods—that is, goods that, once produced, are not excludable from the members of a group for which membership does not depend upon contributions toward provision of the collective good. This paper presents individual‐level environmental collection actions of interest to civil and environmental engineers, examines the conditions under which participation occurs, and explores the appropriate level of involvement of engineers and nonengineers. It is concluded that engineers should take primary roles in the design of programs involving physical facilities and equipment, and that nonengineers can provide critical insight.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Adamec, B. (1991). “Volume‐based collection fees: a success story.” Resour. Recycling, 10(3), 139–140.
2.
Allen, B. P., and Morris, D. (1989). Beyond 25 percent: Materials recovery comes of age. Institute for Local Self‐Reliance, Washington, D.C.
3.
Arbuthnot, J. (1977). “The roles of attitude and personality variables in the prediction of environmental behavior and knowledge.” Envir. and Behavior, 9(2), 217–227.
4.
Arbuthnot, J., Tedeschi, R., Wayner, M., Turner, J., Kressel, S., and Rush, R. (1977). “The induction of sustained recycling behavior through the foot‐in‐the‐door technique.” J. Envir. Systems, 6, 355–369.
5.
Burn, S., and Oskamp, S. (1986). “Increasing community recycling with persuasive communication and public commitment.” J. of Appl. Social Psychology, 16(1), 29–41.
6.
Cooper, R. M. (1982). “A survey of mandatory recycling ordinances.” Resour. Recovery, 1(2), 12–27.
7.
Cummings, L. (1976). “Voluntary strategies in the environmental movement: recycling as cooption.” J. of Voluntary Action Res., 6(3–4), 153–160.
8.
De Young, R. (1985). “Encouraging environmentally appropriate behavior: the role of intrinsic motivation.” J. of Envir. Systems, 15(4), 281–292.
9.
De Young, R. (1990). “Recycling as appropriate behavior: a review of survey data from selected recycling education programs in Michigan.” Resour., Conservation and Recycling, 3, 253–266.
10.
Dunlap, R., and Van Liere, K. (1978). “The ‘new environmental paradigm’: a proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results.” J. of Envir. Education, 9, 10–19.
11.
Decision‐makers guide to solid waste management. (1989). United States environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Washington, D.C.
12.
Everett, J. (1991). “Participation in environmental collective actions requiring the adoption of environmentally protective behavior,” PhD dissertation, Duke University, Durham, N.C.
13.
Everett, J., and Peirce, J. (1991). “National analysis of recycling material recovery rates.” J. Resour. Mgmt. and Tech., 19(4), 148–152.
14.
Everett, J., Jacobs, T., and Peirce, J. (1991). “Recycling promotion strategies: statistical and fuzzy set comparisons.” J. Urban Plng. and Development, ASCE, 117(4), 154–167.
15.
Everett, J., and Peirce, J. (1992a). “Measuring the success of recycling programs.” Resour. Conservation and Recycling, 6, 355–370.
16.
Everett, J., and Peirce, J. (1992b). “Social networks, socioeconomic status, and environmental collective action: residential curbside block leader recycling.” J. of Envir. Systems, 21(1), 65–84.
17.
Everett, J., and Peirce, J. (1993). “Curbside recycling in the USA: Convenience and mandatory participation.” Waste Management and Research, 11, 49–61.
18.
Fireman, B., and Gamson, W. (1979). “Utilitarian logic in the resource mobilization perspective.” The dynamics of social movements: resource mobilization, social control, and tactics. M. Zald and J. McCarthy, eds., Winthrop Publishers, Inc., Cambridge, Mass.
19.
Foran, B. (1987). “1986–87 Oregon/California residential curbside recycling.” Survey Rept., Lane County Waste Management Division, Eugene, Ore.
20.
Fulginity, J. (1985). “Taking the myths out of curbside collection.” Biocycle, 26(6), 24–27.
21.
Geller, E. S. (1986). “Prevention of environmental problems.” Handbook of prevention, B. Edelstein and L. Michelson eds., Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.
22.
Geller, E. S. (1989). “Applied behavior analysis and social marketing: an integration of environmental preservation.” J. of Social Issues, 45(1), 17–36.
23.
Geller, E. S., Winnett, R., and Everett, P. (1982). Preserving the environment: new strategies for behavior change, Pergamon, New York, N.Y.
24.
Gilitz, J. (1989). “Curbside collection containers, a comparative evaluation.” Resour. Recycling, 7(7), 20–51.
25.
Glenn, J. (1987). “Recycling grows up.” Biocycle, 28(8), 54–55.
26.
Glenn, J. (1989). “Enforcing mandatory recycling ordinances.” Biocycle, 30(3), 31–36.
27.
Glenn, J. (1990a). “The state of garbage in America.” Biocycle, 31(4), 34–41.
28.
Glenn, J. (1992). “The state of garbage in America.” Biocycle, 33(4), 46–55.
29.
Goldberg, D. (1990). “The magic of volume reduction.” Waste Age, 19(2), 98–104.
30.
Hardin, R. (1982). Collective action. Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future, Baltimore, Md.
31.
Humphrey, C., Bord, R., Hammond, M., and Mann, S. (1977). “Attitudes and conditions for cooperation in a paper recycling program.” Envir. and Behavior, 9(1), 107–124.
32.
Jacobs, H., and Bailey, J. (1983). “Evaluating participation in a residential recycling program.” J. of Envir. Systems, 12(2).
33.
Jacobs, H., Bailey, J., and Crews, J. (1984). “Development and analysis of a community based resource recovery program.” J. of App. Behavioral Anal., 17(2), 127–145.
34.
Joosten, J. (1980). “Sorting at the source.” Resour. Recovery and Conservation, 5(1), 15–19.
35.
Katzev, R., and Pardini, A. (1988). “The comparative effectiveness of reward and commitment approaches in motivating community recycling.” J. of Envir. Systems, 17(2), 93–113.
36.
Klandermans, B. (1984). “Mobilization and participation: social‐psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory.” Am. Socio. Rev., 49, 583–600.
37.
Long, L. (1989). “How to get results in residential recycling.” Biocycle, 30(8), 76–77.
38.
Luyben, P., and Bailey, J. (1979). “The effect of reward and proximity of containers on newspaper recycling.” Envir. and Behavior, 11, 539–557.
39.
Luyben, P., Wanerr, S., and Tallman, T. (1979). “Recycling beverage containers on a college campus.” J. Envir. Systems, 9(2), 189–202.
40.
Maas, E. (1988). “Recycling education in the schools.” Resour. Recycling, 7(1), 36–37, 58–59.
41.
“Mandatory recycling rule works for Pennsylvania township.” (1985). Biocycle, 26(3), 24.
42.
McCarthy, J., and Zald, M. (1977). “Resource mobilization and social movements: a partial theory.” Am. J. Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241.
43.
McGuiness, J., Jones, A., and Cole, S. (1979). “Attitudinal correlates of recycling behavior.” J. Appl. Psychology, 62(4), 376–384.
44.
McGuire, R. (1984). “Recycling: great expectations and garbage outcomes.” American Behavioral Scientist, 28(1), 93–114.
45.
Mersky, R. (1988). “Basic design parameters for recycling programs.” Journal of Resource Management and Technology, 16(2), 104–107.
46.
Miranda, M., Everett, J., Blume, D., and Roy, B. (1993). “Managing municipal solid waste: the unit‐based pricing approach.” J. of Policy Anal. and Mgmt.
47.
Mitchell, R. (1979). “National environmental lobbies and the apparent illogic of collective action.” Collective decision making: applications from public choice theory. Clifford Russell (Eds.). The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press: Baltimore, Md.
48.
National Recycling Coalition. (1989). The National Recycling Coalition measurement standards and reporting guidelines, draft. Washington, D.C.
49.
Oberschall, A. (1973). Social conflict and social movements. Prentice‐Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
50.
Olson, M. (1965). “The logic of collective action.” Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.
51.
Oliver, P. (1990). “Modeling the Second‐Order Problem is not easy.” Rationality and Society, 2(1), 118–122.
52.
Pardini, A., and Katzev, R. (1984). “The effects of strength of commitment on newspaper recycling.” J. of Envir. Systems, 13, 245–254.
53.
Public attitudes toward garbage disposal. (1990). National Solid Waste Management Assoc. Washington, D.C.
54.
Peluso, R., and Rucker III, E. (1987). “Curbside recycling: the why and the how.” Waste Age Supplement, 40–41.
55.
Pieters, R. (1986). “Participation in source separation projects: design characteristics and perceived costs and benefits.” Resources and conservation, 12(2), 95–111.
56.
Platt, B., Doherty, C., Broughton, A., and Morris, D. (1990). Beyond 40 percent: record‐setting recycling and composting programs, Institute for local self‐reliance: Washington, D.C.
57.
Reid, D., Luyben, P., Rawers, R., and Bailey, J. (1976). “The effects of prompting and proximity of containers on newspaper recycling behavior.” Envir. and Behavior, 8(3), 471–483.
58.
Riggle, D. (1989). “Only pay for what you throw away.” Biocycle, 30(2), 39–41.
59.
Skumatz, L. (1989a). “Volume‐based garbage rates: your best recycling program.” Resource Recycling, 8(6), 5–7.
60.
Skumatz, L. (1989b). “Garbage by the pound.” Resource Recycling, 8(7), 39, 70.
61.
Skumatz, L. (1990). Variable rate: using your rate structure to encourage waste reduction and recycling. Seattle Solid Waste Utility: Seattle, Washington.
62.
Smedberg, J. (1989). “Calculating participation: A look at that tricky multiplier.” Resource Recycling, 8(6), 26–64.
63.
Snow, D., Zucher, L., and Ekland‐Olson, S. (1980). “Social networks and social movements: a microsocial approach to differential recruitment.” Am. Sociological Rev., 45, 787–801.
64.
Source separation: the community awareness program in Sommerville and Marble‐head, Mass. (1976). Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Washington, D.C.
65.
Spaccarelli, S., Zolik, E., and Jason, L. (1990). “Effects of verbal prompting and block characteristics on participation in curbside newspaper recycling.” J. Envir. Systems, 19(1), 45–57.
66.
Sproule, K., and Cosulich, J. (1988). “Higher recovery rates: the answers in the bag.” Resource Recycling, 7(6), 20–44.
67.
Stone, D. (1985). “Curbside in California.” Biocycle, 26(4), 53–54.
68.
Taylor, P. (1986). “Barriers to curbside recycling.” Biocycle, 27(2), 48–49.
69.
Tichenor, R. (1978). “Compliance in a mandatory source separation recycling system.” Compost Science/Land Utilization, 19(4), 20–23.
70.
Turner, R., and Killian, L. (1987). Collective behavior 3rd ed. Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
71.
Vining, J., and Ebreo, A. (1989). “An evaluation of the public response to a community recycling education program.” Society and Natural Resources, 2, 23–36.
72.
Vining, J., and Ebreo, A. (1990). “What makes a recycler? a comparison of recyclers and nonrecyclers.” Environment and Behavior, 22(1), 55–73.
73.
“Volume‐based garbage rates.” (1990). Solid Waste Mgmt. Newsletter, 4(5), 1–3.
74.
Walsh, P., and O'Leary, P. (1988a). “Recycling offers benefits, opportunities … and challenges.” Waste Age, 19(1), 54–60.
75.
Walsh, P., and O'Leary, P. (1988b). “How to plan a community recycling program.” Waste Age, 19(4), 166–170.
76.
Watson, T. (1989). “The garbage police.” Resource Recycling, 8(3), 32–62.
77.
Weigel, R. (1983). “Environmental attitude and the prediction of behavior.” Environmental psychology: directions and perspectives. Praeger, New York, N.Y.
78.
Weigel, R. (1985). “Attitudes and actions in research on environmental problems.” J. Resour. Mgmt. and Technol., 14(2), 123–129.
79.
Witmer, J., and Geller, E. (1976). “Facilitating paper recycling: effects of prompts, raffles, and contests.” J. of Appl. Behavioral Anal., 9(3), 315–322.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 120Issue 2April 1994
Pages: 158 - 176

History

Received: Mar 2, 1993
Published online: Apr 1, 1994
Published in print: Apr 1994

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jess W. Everett, Associate Member, ASCE
Asst. Prof., School of Civ. Engrg. and Envir. Sci., Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share