Ethical Issues Experienced by Engineering Students and Practitioners
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 119, Issue 4
Abstract
According to some philosophers, ethics may be divided into four primary theories—rights ethics, duty ethics, utilitarianism, and virtue ethics. In addition, four secondary theories—ethical egoism, corporate egoism, ethical relativism, and divine‐command ethics—may also be considered. This paper reviews the foregoing ethical theories and presents guidelines that may be followed to promote ethics and professionalism in the workplace. In addition, it presents the results of a survey of engineering students concerning ethics and professionalism and compares the findings with a previous study involving engineering practitioners. The results show that students with minimum work experience tend to rate, the frequency and seriousness of ethical issues lower than students with work experience, members of the Consulting Engineers Council, and faculty. Among the exceptions—alcohol and drug abuse, and failure to protect the environment—are listed in the frequency category. Three issues—technical incompetence or misrepresentation of competence; failure to protect public health, safety, or welfare; and poor quality control or quality of work—are considered serious by students with experience, faculty, and practitioners.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
“Engineering ethics summary.” (1992). Texethics. Murdough Center for Engineering Professionalism, Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, Tex., 3(1), Insert.
2.
Herkert, J. R., and Viscomi, B. V. (1990). “A course in engineering professionalism and ethics.” Proc., Education and Continuing Development for the Civil Engineer: Setting the Agenda for the 90's and Beyond, ASCE, 975–981.
3.
Kile, D. A. (1992). What is all this fuss about business ethics. Textron Corp., Fort Worth, Tex.
4.
Koehn, E. (1992). “Practitioner involvement with engineering ethics and professionalism.” J. Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Practice, ASCE, 118(1), 49–55.
5.
Koehn, E. (1991). “An ethics and professionalism seminar in the civil engineering curriculum.” J. Prof. Issues in Engrg. Educ. and Pract., ASCE, 117(2), 96–101.
6.
Martin, W. M. (1992). “Ethical theories: a thumbnail sketch.” Ethics Workshop, Murdough Center for Engineering Professionalism, Austin, Tex.
7.
Martin, M. W., and Schinzinger, R. (1989). Ethics in engineering, 2nd Ed., McGraw‐Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y.
8.
Professional development program. (1990). Texas State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers, Austin, Tex.
9.
“Results of ‘pilot’ workshop.” (1992). Texethics. Murdough Center for Engineering Professionalism, Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, Tex., 3(2), 7.
10.
Shultz, J. (1992). Elements of the workplace that promote ethics and integrity. General Dynamics Corp., Fort Worth, Tex.
11.
Vann, W. P. (1992). “Engineering ethics bibliography.” Ethics Workshop, Murdough Center for Engineering Professionalism, Austin, Tex.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 119 • Issue 4 • October 1993
Pages: 402 - 408
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 13, 1992
Published online: Oct 1, 1993
Published in print: Oct 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.