Engineering Education for Competitive International Economy
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 119, Issue 4
Abstract
The sources of research funding for U.S. academic institutions are examined through the past two decades. Of particular interest has been the flow of funding to engineering schools. Since the end of World War II most of the funding to our engineering schools has come from federal government sources. It is argued that the research projects carried out with federal funding support are much more science oriented than the research (and development) projects that are supported by industry funds. This science orientation in engineering research has greatly influenced the way engineering faculties view undergraduate education. Because of this science influence, entry‐level engineers in the U.S. enter the work force with little background in professional and related business subjects. It is postulated that this lack of professional training for our entry‐level engineers has significantly contributed to the nation's long‐term decline in the global competitiveness of U.S. technology‐based industries.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
“A national action agenda for engineering education.” (1987). ASEE Report, ASEE, Washington, D. C.
2.
Alsalam, N., and Rogers, G. T. (1991). The condition of education 1991, Volume 2 Postsecondary Education. U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D. C.
3.
Dertouzos, M. L., Lester, R. K., and Solow, R. M. (1990). Made in America, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
4.
“Engineering and engineering technology enrollments.” (1967–1990). Engineering Education, Fall.
5.
“Engineering college research and graduate study.” (1967–1990). Engineering Education, Spring.
6.
Frey, J., and Finan, W. (1991). “Engineering education in Japan: A career‐long process.” Engineering Education, July/August.
7.
Friedland, B., and Dorato, P. (1987). “A case for the doctor of engineering as a first professional degree.” Engineering Education, April/May.
8.
“Future directions for engineering education: system response to a changing world.” (1975). ASEE Report, ASEE, Washington, D. C.
9.
Gaining new ground. (1991). Council on Competitiveness, Washington, D. C., March.
10.
The impact of defense spending on nondefense engineering labor markets, a report to the National Academy of Engineering. (1986). National Academy Press, Washington, D. C.
11.
Kaufman, H. G. (1991). “Continuing education for Japanese engineers is in‐house and on the job.” Engineering Education, July/August.
12.
“Management education.” (1991). The Economist, March 2.
13.
Mason, R. M. (1992). Management of technology education: A challenge for academics and practitioners. Center for the Management of Science and Technology, Case Western Reserve University, July.
14.
“National pattern of R & D resources: 1990.” (1990). NSF90‐316. National Science Foundation, Washington, D. C.
15.
“Report on the engineering sciences.” (1958). ASEE Report, ASEE, Washington, D. C.
16.
“Science and engineering indicators—1989.” (1989). NSB 89‐1, National Science Board, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C.
17.
“Science and engineering personnel: A national overview.” (1985). NSF 85‐302, National Science Foundation, Washington, D. C.
18.
“Workshop on engineering.” (1989). NSF 89‐3, Report on the National Science Foundation Disciplinary Workshops on Undergraduate Education, Washington, D. C.
19.
“You can't go home.” (1991). The Economist, Sept. 28.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 9, 1992
Published online: Oct 1, 1993
Published in print: Oct 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.