Systems‐Engineering Methodology for Engineering Planning Applications
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
Volume 118, Issue 2
Abstract
This paper compiles a complete, concise, systematic systems‐engineering methodology that is practical for typical engineering planning applications. Systems engineering is a general methodology using a top‐down apprach to defining problems and evaluating solutions. It consists of an iterative sequence of functional analysis, requirements analysis, and architecture definition. It is a modification of the classical engineering approach that employs system descriptions of products or programs of interest. The functional description is introduced to complement the traditional physical or task descriptions, and is used to define the problem prior to the engineering of the solution. Another modification of the classical engineering approach is to require that the system approach be used in problem solving. This is necessary to ensure that all feasible alternatives are examined equally and that point solutions are avoided. Although systems engineering applications traditionally have focused on design of large physical systems, the process may be effectively adapted to planning applications. To do so the primary change necessary is to use performance objectives rather than performance requirements.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Blanchard, B. S. (1991). System engineering management. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
2.
Chase, W. P. (1974). Management of system engineering. Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co., Malabar, Fla.
3.
Churchman, C. W. (1983). The systems approach: Revised and updated. Dell Publishing Co., Inc., New York, N.Y.
4.
Davis, E. H. (1990) “A formalization of functional analysis and supporting data structures,” thesis presented to the University of Washington, at Seattle, Wash., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering.
5.
de Neufville, R. (1990). Applied systems analysis. McGraw‐Hill Publishing Co., New York, N.Y.
6.
Finkelstein, L., Land, F., Carson, E. R., and Westcott, J. H. (1986). “Systems theory and systems engineering.” IEE Proc., Part A, 135(6), 401–402.
7.
Gaslight, W. E. (1986). “The system concept and the design engineering.” Automotive Engrg., 94(11), 66–71.
8.
Hamlin, C. (1986). “Systems engineering in the fishing industry.” Marine Tech. 23(2), 158–164.
9.
Hall, A. D. (1962). A methodology for systems engineering. D. Van Mortared Co., Inc., Princeton, N.J.
10.
Hillier, F. S., and Lieberman, G. J. (1990). Introduction to operations research. Holden‐Day, Inc. Oakland, Calif.
11.
Hoefler, B. G. (1991). “Systems engineering applied to hazardous waste management in the state of Washington,” thesis presented to the University of Washington, at Seattle, Wash., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering.
12.
Holden, L. L. (1990). “The ranking of environmental risks: A mulitiobjective approach,” thesis presented to the University of Washington, at Seattle, Wash., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering.
13.
Mar, B. W., and Palmer, R. N. (1989). “Does civil engineering need system engineering?” J. Professional Issues in Civ. Engrg., 115(1), 45–52.
14.
M'Pherson, P. K. (1986). “Systems engineering: A proposed definition,” IEE Proc., Part A, 133(6), 330–331.
15.
M'Pherson, P. K., Beaty, R. T., Rawson, K. J., Francis, N., Whitmasrch‐Everiss, M. J., Hitchins, D. K., and Chandler, A. (1986). “Systems engineering: Its nature and scope,” IEE Proc., Part A, 133(6), 358–359.
16.
Nadler, G. (1986). “Systems methodology and design.” Mech. Engrg., 108(9), 84–88.
17.
Saaty, T. L. (1977). “A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures.” J. Mathematical Psychology, 15(June), 234–281.
18.
Saaty, T. L. (1982). Decision making for leaders: The analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world. Lifetime Learning Publications, Belmont, Calif.
19.
Smith, W. F., Kamal, S., and Mistree, F. (1987). “The influence of hierarchical decisions on ship design.” Marine Tech., 24(2), 131–142.
20.
Systems engineering management guide. (1983). Defense Systems Management College, Fort Belvoir, Va.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Apr 1, 1992
Published in print: Apr 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.