Quality Undergraduate Engineering Education—A Critical Perspective
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering
Volume 115, Issue 3
Abstract
Within the current engineering educational system, the term quality has interpretations that vary from achievable intellectual levels to the financial state of the institution. The desire for quality is inherent in academe, but its conception varies, producing varied standards and assessment practices. Concern for quality undergraduate engineering education is not unusual due to current societal trends which have resulted in declining enrollment; changing student characteristics, including those due to the percentage increase of foreign students; and changing expectations of an engineering education. In this context the definition of quality undergraduate engineering education assumes significant importance, as do the processes to achieve it. The incorporation of an integrated liberal arts core within the curriculum, co‐op education and an emphasis on general intellectual development, instead of mere technical competence are seen to lead to an education of merit and worth, and thus one of quality.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Anderson, H. R. (1986). “The professional school concept—Breaking new ground.” In Crisis Management in Higher Education, Hal Hoverland, Pat McInturff and C. E. Tapie Rolm Jr., eds. Jossey Bass Inc. Publishers, San Francisco, Calif.
2.
ASEE Reassessment of Engineering and Engineering Technology Study. (1977). Report of the Ad Hoc ASEE Committee, Engineering Education, May, 765–776.
3.
ASEE Task Force Report. (1987) “The national action agenda for engineering education.” Engineering Education, Nov., 95–99. ASEE.
4.
“Beyond necessity—Report of the President's Commission on undergraduate education.” (1987). University of Delaware.
5.
Blau, P. M. (1973). The organization of academic work. Wiley, New York, N.Y.
6.
Bragg, A. K. (1976). “The socialization process in higher education.” AAHE‐ERIC/Higher Education Research Report No. 7, American Association for Higher Education, Washington D.C.
7.
Ciereszko, A. A. (1987). “Mandated testing in Florida, a faculty perspective.” In Student Outcomes Assessment, Halpern D. F. ed., Jossey Bass, San Francisco, Calif.
8.
Committee on the Education and Utilization of the Engineer. (1985). National Research Council, “Engineering Education and Practice in the United States,” National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
9.
Conrad, C. F., and Wilson, R. F. (1985). “Academic program reviews—Institutional approaches, expectations and controversies.” ASHE‐ERIC Higher Ed Report No. 5.
10.
Culver, R. S., and Hackos, J. T. (1982). “Perry's model of intellectual development.” Engineering Education, Dec., 221–226.
11.
“Engineering undergraduate education” (1986), Panel on undergraduate engineering education, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
12.
Gardner, J. W. (1961). Excellence, Harper Colophon, New York, N.Y.
13.
Gianniny, D. A. (1982). “Engineering—A liberating education for a high technology world.” Engineering Education, Nov., 159–165.
14.
Halpern, D. F., ed. (1987). “Student outcomes assessment—What institutions stand to gain.” Jossey Bass, San Francisco, Calif.
15.
Keiming, R. T. (1983). “Raising academic standards—A guide to learning improvement.” ASHE‐ERIC Higher Education Research Report No. 4 ASHE.
16.
Kemp, J. E. (1987). “Providing for quality in teaching.” College Teaching, 35/4, Fall, 152.
17.
Kuh, G. D. (1981). “Indices of quality in the undergraduate experience.” AAHEERIC/Higher Education Research Report No. 4, Washington D.C.
18.
Marcus, L. R., Leone, A. O., and Goldberg, E. D., “The path to excellence quality assurance in higher education.” ASHE‐ERIC/Higher Education Research Report No. 1, Washington D.C.
19.
McMullen‐Pastrick, G. M. (1983). “Examinations, accentuating the positive.” College Teaching, 34/4, 135–139.
20.
Perry, W. (1970). “Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years, a scheme.” Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, N.Y.
21.
Piper, D. W. (1984). “An investigation of the duties of external examiners in higher education in the UK.” Proceedings, Tenth International Conference on Improving University Teaching, College Park, Md., 184–197.
22.
Quality of engineering education. (1986). Executive Summary of the QUEEP Final Report, Engineering Education, Oct., 16–50.
23.
Rokeach, M. (1960). “The open and closed mind.” Basic Books, New York, N.Y.
24.
“Samuel Neaman Institute—Technion report. (1987). Engineering Education, Nov., 105–124.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering
Volume 115 • Issue 3 • July 1989
Pages: 241 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1989
Published in print: Jul 1989
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.