Technology and Competitive Advantage in Civil Engineering
Publication: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering
Volume 114, Issue 3
Abstract
At present at least three driving forces in construction markets indicate the increasing importance of advanced technology: the technical complexity of constructed facilities is increasing, owners faced with increasing international competition are demanding more of designers and constructors, and the size, diversity, and state of technology in the U.S. construction market are making it increasingly attractive for foreign competitors. To help prepare for the changes that these forces will bring about, the present paper describes how advanced technology can bring about competitive advantage in design and construction firms. An overview of competition in the construction industry is given and strategies for technology‐based competitive advantage in design and construction are proposed. The strategies are: “not proud,” “efficiency expert,” construction R&D heresy, “work smarter,” forward technical integration, and backward technical integration. The strategies lead to conclusions concerning changes in the structure of the profession, shifts in the division of responsibility, changes in the performance of design and construction, and altered qualifications for successful careers in civil engineering.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Becker, James M. (1986). “Rowes wharf: A case study in substructure innovation.” Proc. Tech. Session: Constr. Innovation, Demands, Successes, and Lessons, C. B. Tatum, ed., ASCE Convention, Seattle, Apr., 1–10.
2.
Burgelman, Robert H., and Sayles, Leonard R. (1986). Inside corporate innovation, strategy, structure and managerial skills, The Free Press, New York, N.Y.
3.
More construction for the money. (1983). Business Roundtable, 200 Park Avenue, New York, N.Y., Jan.
4.
Frohman, Alan J. (1980). “Managing the company's technological assets.” Res. Mgmt., 14(9), 20–24.
5.
Hayes, Robert H., and Abernathy, William J. (1980). “Managing our way to economic decline.” Harvard Bus. Rev., 58(4), 67–77.
6.
Hayes, Robert H., and Wheelwright, Stephen C. (1984). Restoring our competitive edge: Competing through manufacturing. John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.
7.
“Japanese construction industry.” (1986). Engrg. News Record, 217(23), j1–j16.
8.
Lange, Julian E., and Mills, Daniel Q. (1979). The construction industry. Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass.
9.
Paulson, Boyd C., Jr. (1985). “Automation and robotics for construction.” J. of Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 111(3), 190–207.
10.
Pinyan, Charles T. (1987a). “Foreign awards continue decline in most regions.” ENR, 219(3), 26–55.
11.
Pinyan, Charles T. (1987b). “Foreign billings turn downward to $3.5 billion.” ENR, 219(6), 22–33.
12.
Porter, Michael E. (1980). Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. The Free Press, New York, N.Y.
13.
Porter, Michael E. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. The Free Press, New York, N.Y.
14.
“Reshaping to ride the new wave.” (1985). Engrg. News Rec., 215(9), 24–28.
15.
Riggs, Henry E. (1983). Managing high‐technology companies. Lifetime Learning Publications, Belmont, Calif.
16.
Rosenberg, Nathan. (1982). Inside the black box: technology and economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
17.
Tatum, C. B. (1986). “Potential mechanisms for construction innovation.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 112(2), 178–191.
18.
Tatum, C. B. (1987a). “Business planning for design and construction firms.” J. Mgmt. Engrg., ASCE, 3(2), 117–126.
19.
Tatum, C. B. (1987b). “The process of innovation in the construction firm.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 113(4), 648–663.
20.
Tatum, C. B. (1987c). “Innovation on the construction project: a process view.” Project Mgmt. J., Project Management Institute, XVIII(5), 57–67.
21.
Tatum, C. B., and Funke, A. W. (1988). “Partially‐automated grading: A construction process innovation.” J. Constr. Engrg. Mgmt., ASCE, 114(1), 19–35, March.
22.
Teece, David J. (1987). The competitive challenge, strategies for industrial innovation and renewal. Ballinger Publishing Co., Cambridge, Mass.
23.
“To keep America competitive.” (1986). ENR, 218(8), July 31, 23–31.
24.
1977 census of construction industries, industry and area statistics. (1981). U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., July.
25.
A competitive assessment of the U.S. international construction industry. (1984). U.S. Dept. Commerce, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., July.
26.
“International competition in services.” (1987). U.S. Office of Tech. Assessment, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., July.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering
Volume 114 • Issue 3 • July 1988
Pages: 256 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1988
Published in print: Jul 1988
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.