Strength and Stiffness of All-Timber Pegged Connections
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 21, Issue 1
Abstract
Traditional green oak timber construction, in which frames are connected with the all-timber pegged mortice and tenon joint, is enjoying a revival in the United Kingdom and the United States. However, innovation in design and construction is restricted by a lack of design guidelines or methods for the strength and stiffness analysis of traditional carpentry connections and frames. This paper presents the development of models to predict the stiffness and strength of all-timber pegged mortice and tenon connections as used in traditional green oak carpentry in the United Kingdom. Models developed based upon experimental observations and finite-element modeling are shown to provide simple and effective methods of predicting pegged connection strength and stiffness based upon an energy approach and a four-point beam bending analogy respectively.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers would like to thank the EPSRC and Buro Happold for funding the research project from which this paper is a small sample. Richard Harris from Buro Happold and Christopher Mettem from TRADA are thanked for their invaluable input into the research and thanks to Oakwrights Ltd. for their great support in the form of materials, joints, and timber frames to test. Finally colleagues at the University of Bath are thanked for their input to this work.
References
British Standards Institution (BSI). (2002). “Structural use of timber—Part 2: Code of practice for permissible stress design, materials and workmanship.” BS 5268, London.
British Standards Institution (BSI). (2003). “Timber structures. Structural timber and glued laminated timber. Determination of some physical and mechanical properties.” BS EN 408, London.
British Standards Institute (BSI). (2004a). “Eurocode 5. Design of timber structures.” BS EN 1996, London.
British Standards Institute (BSI). (2004b). “Eurocode 5. Design of timber structures. General common rules and rules for buildings.” BS EN 1995, London.
Brown, A. (1995). The genius of Japanese carpentry: The secrets of a craft, Kondansha International, New York.
Brungraber, R. L. (1985). “Traditional timber joinery: A modern analysis.” Ph.D. thesis, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
Clifton, A. (2004). “Testing of pegs commonly used in traditional green oak carpentry.” BEng final year dissertation, Univ. of Bath, Bath, U.K.
Daniels, C. E. (1999). “Design considerations for mortise and tenon connections.” MSc thesis, Univ. of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyo.
Hewitt, C. A. (1980). English historic carpentry, Phillimore, London.
Johansen, K. W. (1949). “Theory of timber connections.” Int. Assoc. Bridge Struct. Eng., 9, 249–262.
Larsen, H. J. (1973). “The yield load of bolted and nailed connections.” Proc., Int. Union of Forestry Research Organisation, Division V Conf., 646–655.
MacKay, R. B. (1997). “Timber frame tension joinery.” MSc thesis, Univ. of Wyoming, Wyo.
Sandberg, L. B., Bulleit, W. M., and Reid, E. H. (2000). “The strength and stiffness of oak pegs in traditional timber frame joints.” J. Struct. Eng., 126(6), 717–723.
Shanks, J. D. (2005). “Developing rational design guidelines for traditional joints in oak frame construction.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Bath, Bath, U.K.
Shanks, J. D., and Walker, P. J. (2005). “Experimental performance of mortice and tenon connections in green oak.” Struct. Eng., 83(17), 40–45.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Jul 18, 2006
Accepted: Mar 18, 2008
Published online: Jan 1, 2009
Published in print: Jan 2009
Notes
Note. Associate Editor: Roberto Lopez-Anido
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.