Wood and Engineered Wood Product Connections Using Small Steel Tube Fasteners: Applicability of European Yield Model
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 19, Issue 11
Abstract
Capacities of wood connections with laterally loaded dowel fasteners by plastic analysis can be predicted using the European yield models (EYM) equation. The underlying concept is that failure occurs due to crushing of wood beneath fasteners and / or formation of plastic hinges in fasteners with a rigid-plastic representation of the materials involved. EYM prediction is now “the” way within design codes to calculate the maximum attainable capacity per fastener. Subsequent adjustments discount those predictions through factors which account for unequal sharing of force between fasteners and premature connection failure by fracturing. In North America the EYM is the basis for lateral load capacities of connections made with bolts, drift-pins, screws, nails, and timber rivets. This paper addresses the capability of the EYM for predicting load carrying capacities of solid wood (sawn softwood lumber) and laminated strand lumber (LSL) connections employing tight-fitting steel tube fasteners with external diameters up to . EYM prediction is compared with experimental test results for arrangements with one or four fasteners loaded in double shear. Accuracy of predictions depends on factors such as connection geometry and the type of wood member involved. Prediction is always accurate if a connection has only one fastener, or if joined members are made from LSL. If members are made from sawn softwood lumber premature brittle splitting type failure modes occur for multiple fastener situations, with impairment of capacity inversely proportional to the fastener outside diameter. Suggestions are made here regarding the nature of codified design rules for steel tube fastener connections, with the intent that such provisions be enacted within North America.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Financial support for this work was provided by Natural Resources Canada under Value-to-Wood Research Project No. “UNSPECIFIEDUNB2—Design Methods for Connections in Engineered Wood Structures” (2003–2006).
References
American Forest & Paper Association (AF&PA). (1997). National design specification for wood construction, Washington, DC.
ASTM (2000a). “Density.” D 2395, West Conshohocken, Pa.
ASTM (2000b). “Moisture content.” D 4442, West Conshohocken, Pa.
ASTM (2000c). “Standard test methods for bolted connections in wood and wood based products.” D5652-95, West Conshohocken, Pa.
ASTM (2001). “Standard specification for seamless cold-drawn low-carbon steel heat-exchanger and condenser tubes.” A179, West Conshohocken, Pa.
ASTM (2002a). “Standard specification for carbon structural steel.” A36/A36M-02, West Conshohocken, Pa.
ASTM (2002b). “Standard test method for evaluating dowel-bearing strength of wood and wood-based products.” D5764-97a, West Conshohocken, Pa.
British Standards Institution (BSI). (1995). “Design of timber structures: General rules.” Eurocode 5: Part 1.1, London.
Canadian Standards Association (CSA). (2005). “Engineering design in wood.” CSA O86-01, Toronto.
Guan, Z. W., and Rodd, P. D. (2000). “A three-dimensional finite element model for locally reinforced timber joints made with hollow dowel fasteners.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 27, 785–797.
Johansen, K. W. (1949). “Theory of timber connections.” Int. Asso. for Bridge and Struct. Eng., 98, 249–262.
Kharouf, N., McClure, G., and Smith, I. (2003). “Elastoplastic contact modeling of wood bolted connections.” Comput. Struct., 81(8–11), 747–754.
Kharouf, N., McClure, G., and Smith, I. (2005). “Postelastic behaviour of single- and double-bolt timber connections.” J. Struct. Eng., 131(1), 188–196.
Lam, F. (2001). “Modern structural wood products.” Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater., 3(3), 238–245.
Leijten, A. J. M. (1998). “Densified veneer wood reinforced timber joints with expanded tube fasteners.” Ph.D. thesis, Delf Univ. and Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Madsen, B. (2000). Behaviour of timber connections, Timber Engineering Ltd., North Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
Pedersen, M. U., Clorius, C. O., Damkilde, L., Hoffmeyer, P., and Esklidsen, L. (1999). “Dowel type connections with slotted-in steel plates.” Working Commission W18-Timber Structure, Paper 32-7-8, International Council for Building Research Studies and Documentation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Smith, I., Craft, S., and Quenneville, P. (2001). “Design capacities of joints with laterally loaded nails.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 28, 282–290.
Smith, I., Whale, L. R. J., Anderson, C., and Held, L. (1984). “Influence of nail properties on nailed joint behaviour.” Paper No. 17-7-1. International Council for Building Research Studies and Documentation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Smith, I., Whale, L. R. J., Anderson, C., Hilson, B. O., and Rodd, P. D. (1988). “Design properties of laterally loaded nailed or bolted wood joints.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 15, 633–643.
Tan, D., and Smith, I. (1999). “Failure in-the-row model for bolted timber connections.” J. Struct. Eng., 125(7), 713–718.
Whale, L. R. J., and Smith, I. (1989). “A method for measuring the embedding characteristics of wood and wood based materials.” Mater. Struct., 22, 403–410.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Feb 22, 2006
Accepted: May 25, 2006
Published online: Nov 1, 2007
Published in print: Nov 2007
Notes
Note. Associate Editor: Roberto Lopez-Anido
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.