Viscosity Characteristics of Rubber-Modified Asphalts
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 8, Issue 3
Abstract
This study presents a state-of-the-art review of crumb-rubber modified (CRM) asphalt concrete technology and describes the results of viscosity measurements of CRM asphalt cements using a Brookfield viscometer. Literature was reviewed in relation to both the wet process (i.e., mixing of the crumb rubber with the binder prior to mixing with the aggregate) and the dry process (i.e., simultaneous mixing of the crumb rubber, the binder, and the aggregate). In wet processes, the reaction that takes place between rubber particles and asphalt binder is not chemical in nature, but rather a diffusion of the light aromatic components of the binder into the crumb rubber. This results in a reduction in the viscosity of the binder, which depends on the type of the binder, the type of the rubber, the mixing temperature, and the mixing energy (i.e., time). In dry processes, the crumb-rubber particles replace aggregate particles in the asphalt concrete mix, while due to the limited mixing time allowed, no significant reaction takes place between the crumb rubber and the binder. Brookfield viscometer testing of the CRM binder was conducted following a variation of the ASTM standards D2196-86 and D4402-87. Three binders were tested, namely AC-5, AC-10, and AC-20, with CRM percentages of 0, 3, 5, 7, 12, and 18. The CRM particle size was finer than sieve size No. 80. The viscosity of the CRM asphalt cement initially decreased in time, until the temperature of the crumb-rubber chips reached that of the binder. This took place in approximately 30–40 min, when a minimum viscosity value was reached, called the “stabilized” viscosity. The high-percentage CRM, however, experienced a linear increase in viscosity with time at a rate of approximately 180 cP/hr as mixing continued past the stabilized viscosity.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Epps, J. A. (1993). “Uses of recycled rubber tires in highways.”Synthesis of Hwy. Pract. 198, Transp. Res. Board, Nat. Res. Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
2.
Estakhri, C. K., Button, J. W., and Fernando, E. G. (1992). “Use, availability, and cost-effectiveness of asphalt rubber in Texas.”Transp. Res. Rec. No. 1339, Paper No. 920579, Texas Transp. Inst., College Station, Texas.
3.
Heitzman, M. A. (1992). “State of the practice—design and construction of asphalt paving materials with crumb rubber modifier.”Fed. Hwy. Admin. Rep. FHWA-SA-92-022, U.S. Dept. of Transp., Washington, D.C.
4.
Lougheed, T. J. (1995). “Characteristics of crumb-rubber modified asphalts,” MS thesis, Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Washington State Univ., Pullman, Wash.
5.
Roberts, F. L., Kandhal, P. S., Brown, E. R., and Dunning, R. L. (1989). “Investigation and evaluation of ground tire rubber in hot mix asphalt.” Nat. Ctr. for Asphalt Technol., Auburn Univ., Auburn University, Ala.
6.
Shuler, T. S., Pavlovich, R. D., Epps, J. A., and Adams, C. K. (1985). “Investigation of materials and structural properties of asphalt-rubber paving mixtures, Vol. I.”Tech. Rep., U.S. Dept. of Transp., Fed. Hwy. Admin., Washington, D.C.
7.
Stroup-Gardiner, M., Newcomb, D. E., and Tanquist, B. (1993). “Asphalt-rubber interactions.”TRB Paper No. 930809, Transp. Res. Board, Washington, D.C.
8.
Terrel, R. L. (1993). “Evaluation of CRM asphalt pavements using SHRP tests.”Rep. No. B14, The Clean Washington Ctr., Seattle, Wash.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Aug 1, 1996
Published in print: Aug 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.