Concept Evaluation Methodology for Extraterrestrial Habitats
Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 5, Issue 3
Abstract
The paper examines and compares structural concepts considered for use as habitats for lunar and Martian outposts. An evaluation methodology that allows numeric rating of concepts was previously developed and is upgraded herein. The methodology defines a number of important characteristics on which concepts are to be judged. In addition, weighting factors are assigned for the various characteristics considered in the evaluation system. These factors are presented as variables that depend on mission goals and timing aspects. An example evaluation is made for a specific scenario utilizing the developed methodology. The overall purpose of this work is not to provide an absolute rating, but rather to identify strengths and weaknesses of concepts. This approach should be invaluable in the development and selection of structural concepts for extraterrestrial habitats.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Chow, P. Y., and Lin, T. Y. (1989). “Structural engineer's concept of lunar structures.” J. Aerosp. Engrg., ASCE, 2(1), 1–9.
2.
Drake, R. M. (1991). “Production of lunar concrete in a large pressurized assembly facility.” Lunar Concrete Symp. 1990–1991, American Concrete Institute (ACI), Detroit, Mich.
3.
Drake, R. M., and Richter, P. J. (1990). “Design and construction of a lunar outpost assembly facility.” Engineering, construction and operations in space II, S. W. Johnson and J. P. Wetzel, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 449–457.
4.
Exploration studies technical report, FY 1988 status. (1988). Office of Exploration, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Washington, D.C.
5.
Graf, J. (1988). “Construction operations for an early lunar base.” Engineering, Construction, and Operations in Space, S. W. Johnson and J. P. Wetzel, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 190–201.
6.
“Innovative structures for space applications.” (1982). Report No. GAC 19‐1563, Goodyear Aerospace Corp., Akron, Ohio.
7.
Lin, T. D., Senseney, J. A., Arp, L. D., and Lindbergh, C. (1989). “Concrete lunar base investigation.” J. Aerosp. Engrg., ASCE, 2(1), 10–19.
8.
Mangan, J. J. (1990). “Hedratexture and expandable platform.” J. Aerosp. Engrg., ASCE 3(3), 155–172.
9.
Namba, H., Yoshida, T., Matsumoto, S., Sugihara, K., and Kal, Y. (1988). “Concrete habitable structures on the Moon.” Engineering, construction and operations in space, S. W. Johnson and J. P. Wetzel, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 178–189.
10.
Outreach. (1988). 1(7), 5–6.
11.
Richter, P. J., Anderson, T. L., Drake, R. M., and Kumar, R. P. (1988). “Strategy for design and construction of lunar facilities.” Engineering, construction, and operations in space, S. W. Johnson and J. P. Wetzel, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 904–915.
12.
Richter, P. J., Drake, R. M., Kumar, R. P., and Anderson, T. L. (1990). “Concept for lunar outpost development.” J. Aerosp. Engrg., ASCE, 3(4), 241–250.
13.
Richter, P. J., and Drake, R. M. (1990). “A preliminary evaluation of extraterrestrial building systems.” Engineering, construction, and operations in space II, S. W. Johnson and J. P. Wetzel, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 409–418.
14.
Spudis, P. D., and Taylor, G. J. (1990). “Rationale and requirements for lunar exploration.” Engineering, construction and operations in space II, S. W. Johnson and J. P. Wetzel, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 236–245.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 5 • Issue 3 • July 1992
Pages: 282 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1992
Published in print: Jul 1992
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.