Behavior and Design of Commercial Multistory Buildings Subjected to Blast
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 20, Issue 4
Abstract
The behavior of nonmilitary buildings subjected to blast is considered. Case studies from World War II are described, as well as more recent events from the detonation of large vehicle borne devices in the Middle East, North America, and Europe. Conventional methods for nonseismic design are shown to lead to frames with overstrong beams connected together by relatively weak connections. This may explain much of the evidence from bomb damaged buildings in which building connections have been observed to fracture in a brittle manner when subjected to blast. The risk of progressive collapse may be minimized by strengthening beam to column connections located at close proximity to potential vehicle borne devices and a capacity design method for such strengthening is advocated.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This paper extends work previously published in the International Conference on Forensic Engineering, London in 2005.
References
Baker, J. F., Williams, E. L., and Lax, D. (1948). “The civil engineer in war—volume 3: Properties of materials, structures, hydraulics, tunneling and surveying.” Symposium of papers, Institution of Civil Engineers, London.
Byfield, M. P. (2004). “The economic design of multi-storey steel framed buildings to resist terrorist attack.” Struct. Eng., 31–38.
Byfield, M. P. (2005). “Prevention of progressive collapses due to terrorist attacks.” Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Forensic Engineering: Diagnosing Failures and Solving Problems, Taylor and Francis, London, 233–240.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2003). “Building damage.” Risk Management Series, Primer for design of commercial buildings to mitigate terrorist attacks, Chap. 4, FEMA-427, Washington, D.C.
Gibbons, C. (2003). “Making sense of tall: The design of high rise buildings in a post 9/11 world.” Joint Institution of Structural Engineers/IABSE Lecture, London.
House Armed Services Committee. (1996). “The Khobar Towers bombing incident, chairman’s statement and staff report.” ⟨http://armedservices.house.gov/Publications/104thCongress/Reports/saudi.pdf⟩ (Jan. 17, 2006).
Marine Corps Gazette. (1984). Dept. of Defense Commission Rep. on Beirut Massacre.
Munoz-Garcia, E., Davidson, J. B., and Tyas, A. (2005). “Analysis of the response of structural bolts subjected to rapid rates of loading.” Eurosteel 2005, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rhodes, P. S. (1974). “The structural assessment of buildings subjected to bomb damage.” Struct. Eng., 52(9), 329–339.
Robertson, L. E. (2005). “Rising to the challenge.” Struct. Eng., 20–27.
U.S. Departments of the Army, Navy and Air Force. (1991). “Structural Steel Design.” Technical manual TM5-1300: Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions, Chap. 5, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, Washington, D.C.
Walley, F. (1994a). “The effect of explosions on structures.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., Struct. Build., 104, 325–334.
Walley, F. (1994b). “The protection of buildings against terrorism and disorder.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., Struct. Build., 104, 345.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 20 • Issue 4 • November 2006
Pages: 324 - 329
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Jan 27, 2006
Accepted: Mar 31, 2006
Published online: Nov 1, 2006
Published in print: Nov 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.