Preventing Disproportionate Collapse
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 20, Issue 4
Abstract
“Disproportionate collapse” is structural collapse disproportionate to the cause; it is often, though not always, progressive, where “progressive collapse” is the collapse of all or a large part of a structure precipitated by damage or failure of a relatively small part of it. There have been many attempts to develop design guidelines and criteria that would reduce or eliminate the susceptibility of buildings to this form of failure. In recent years, the particular focus has been on the prevention of progressive collapse due to deliberate attack. The present study suggests, however, that these guidelines and criteria may be of limited value. Arguably the most important deficiency in the state of the art of design to prevent disproportionate or progressive collapse is uncertainty about the design event: We have the technology now to design for almost anything, but most recent building failures due to explosions and terrorist attacks have involved insults to the building not anticipated in design guidelines and criteria.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2002). Building code requirements for structural concrete: ACI 318-02, ACI, Farmington Hills, Mich.
ASCE. (2005). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures: SEI∕ASCE 7-05, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (1996). “The Oklahoma City bombing: Improving building performance through multihazard mitigation,” FEMA Rep. 277, ASCE and Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
General Services Administration (GSA). (2000). Facilities standards for the public buildings service: P100-2000, GSA, Washington, D.C.
General Services Administration (GSA). (2003a). Facilities standards for the public buildings service: P100-2003, GSA, Washington, D.C.
General Services Administration (GSA). (2003b). Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects, GSA, Washington, D.C.
NIST. (2005). “The collapse of the World Trade Center towers.” Final Rep., NIST, Gaithersburg, Md.
Pearson, C., and DeLatte, N. (2005). “Ronan Point apartment tower collapse and its effect on building codes,” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 19(2), 172–177.
Ramabhushanam, E., and Lynch, M. (1994). “Structural assessment of bomb damage for World Trade Center,” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 8(4), 229–242.
Sunder, S. (2004). “Building and fire safety: Responding to the World Trade Center disaster.” Rep. Presented to the Chicago Committee on High-Rise Buildings, Chicago.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Dec 28, 2005
Accepted: Mar 28, 2006
Published online: Nov 1, 2006
Published in print: Nov 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.