Fuzzy Logic Based Condition Rating of Existing Reinforced Concrete Bridges
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 20, Issue 3
Abstract
Fuzzy logic is a means for modeling the uncertainty involved in describing an event/result using natural language. The fuzzy logic approach would be particularly useful for remedying the uncertainties and imprecision in bridge inspectors’ observations. This study explores the possibilities of using fuzzy mathematics for condition assessment and rating of bridges, developing a systematic procedure and formulations for rating existing bridges using fuzzy mathematics. Computer programs developed from formulations presented in this paper are used for evaluating the rating of existing bridges, and the details are presented in the paper. In this approach, the entire bridge has been divided into three major components—deck, superstructure, and substructure—each of which is further subdivided into a number of elements. Using fuzzy mathematics in combination with an eigenvector-based priority setting approach, the resultant rating set for the bridge has been evaluated based on the specified ratings and importance factors for all the elements of the bridge. Then the defuzzified value of the resultant rating fuzzy set becomes the rating value for the bridge as a whole. It is argued that the methodology presented in this paper would help the decision makers/bridge inspectors immensely.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgment
This paper is being published with the kind permission of the director, Structural Engineering Research Centre, Chennai, India.
References
Aturaliya, S. P. (1994). “Bridge condition rating based on fuzzy set theory and eigenvector approach.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, Kan.
Bertero, V. V., and Bresler, B. (1977). “Design and engineering decisions: Failure criteria (limit state): Developing methodologies for evaluating the earth quake safety of existing buildings.” Rep. No. UCB-EERC-77/06, Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, Univ. of California at Berkeley, Calif., 114–142.
Brown, C. B., and Yao, J. T. P. (1983). “Fuzzy sets and structural engineering.” J. Struct. Eng., 109(5), 1211–1225.
Dong, W. M., and Wong, F. S. (1987). “Fuzzy weighted average and implementation of the extension principle.” Fuzzy Sets Syst., 21(2), 183–199.
Emami, M. R., Turksen, I. B., and Goldenberg, A. A. (1998). “Development of a systematic methodology of fuzzy logic modelling.” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 6(3), 346–361.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA. (1991). Bridge inspectors training manual 90, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Bureau of Public Roads, Washington, D.C.
Jwu, T. H., Harn, Y., and Liou, W. M. (1991). “Fuzzy evaluation of wharf structures at harbour.” Rep. of Investigation of Corrosion Failure and Its Protection Strategy for Harbour Wharf, Institute of Engineering and Technology of Ten-Jin Waterway, Dept. of Transportation, Ten-Jin, China.
Kaufmann., A., and Gupta., M. M. (1985). Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic theory and applications, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Kawamura, K., and Miyamoto, A. (2003). “Condition state evaluation of existing reinforced concrete bridges using neuro-fuzzy hybrid system.” Comput. Struct., 81(18–19), 1931–1940.
Liang, M. T., Chang, J.-W., and Li, Q.-F. (2002). “Grey and regression models predicting the remaining service life of existing reinforced concrete bridges.” J. Grey Syst., 14(4), 291–310.
Liang, M.-T., Wu, J.-H., and Liang, C.-H. (2001). “Multiple layer fuzzy evaluation for existing reinforced concrete bridges.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 7(4), 144–159.
Melhem, H. G., and Aturaliya, S. (1996). “Bridge condition rating using an eigenvector of priority setting.” Microcomput. Civ. Eng., 11(6), 421–432.
Mullarky, P. W., and Fenves, S. J. (1985). “Fuzzy logic in a geotechnical knowledge-based system: Cone.” Proc., NSF Workshop on Civil Engineering Applications of Fuzzy Sets, Purdue Univ., Purdue, Ind.
Qian, Y. J. (1992). “Evaluation and diagnosis of existing reinforced concrete bridges.” Ph.D. dissertation, Southwest Chiaotung Univ., Xian, China.
Saaty, T. L. (1994). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the AHP, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
Sasmal, S., Ramanjaneyulu, K., Gopalakrishnan, S., and Lakshmanan, N. (2004a). “Application of fuzzy mathematics for condition rating of existing reinforced concrete bridges.” SERC Research Rep. No. RCS-MLP10741-RR-2004-4, Structural Engineering Research Centre, Chennai, India.
Sasmal, S., Ramanjaneyulu, K., Gopalakrishnan, S, and Lakshmanan, N. (2004b). “Condition rating of bridges using fuzzy mathematics.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Advances in Concrete Composites and Structures, Structural Engineering Research Centre, Chennai, India, 943–952.
Sasmal, S., Ramanjaneyulu, K., Gopalakrishnan, S., and Lakshmanan, N. (2004c). “Condition assessment of existing reinforced concrete bridges through priority ranking,” Int. J. of Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, in press.
Shiaw, S. S., and Huang, W. D. (1990). “Synthesis evaluation of fuzzy and random properties for bridge bearing capacity.” J. Chiaotung Institute at Chung Ching, 1(1), 64–71.
Tee, A. B., and Bowman, M. D. (1991). “Bridge condition assessment using fuzzy weighted averages.” Civ. Eng. Syst., 8(1), 49–57.
Tee, A. B., Bowman, M. D., and Sinha, K. C. (1988). “A fuzzy mathematical approach for bridge condition evaluation.” Civ. Eng. Syst., 5(1), 17–25.
Wang, H. D. (1996). “Basic study on durability evaluation of reinforced concrete structure.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Dalian Univ. of Technology, Dalian, China.
Yu, L., and Cheng, M. (1994). “A new method to group decision making with multiple objectives—Interactive comparison matrix approach.” J. Syst. Eng., 9(2), 28–35.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). “Fuzzy sets.” Info. & Ctl., 8(3), 338–353.
Zhao, Z., and Chen, C. (2002). “A fuzzy system for concrete bridge damage diagnosis.” Comput. Struct., 80, 629–641.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 20 • Issue 3 • August 2006
Pages: 261 - 273
Copyright
© 2006 ASCE.
History
Received: Feb 25, 2005
Accepted: Oct 18, 2005
Published online: Aug 1, 2006
Published in print: Aug 2006
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.