State of Practice of Residential Floor Slab Flatness
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 15, Issue 4
Abstract
Forensic engineering investigations of residential structures often include measurements of elevation differences across the slab-on-grade floor as an indicator of movement (settlement or heave) of the underlying soil. Such assessments are predicated on an assumption that the slab was flat or very nearly so at the time of initial placement. Despite the relatively frequent use of such measurements in practice, confirmation of the underlying assumption is scarce in the archival literature. This paper describes a testing program to measure the deviation from level of a large number of residential concrete slab-on-grade floors in Phoenix, Arizona, within a few days of concrete placement. An average maximum elevation change of 13.5 mm was observed. Average and maximum slopes are also presented. The construction of the residential structure atop the slab was found to have no statistically significant effect on the levelness of the slab, nor did the season in which the concrete was placed. Residential slab-on-grade construction methods are reviewed, concluding that this degree of deviation from level is to be expected. Comparison of the data with recommendations in the literature suggests that caution must be taken in evaluation of cosmetic or structural impairment of residential structures based in large part on measurements of interior floor slab levelness.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
American Concrete Institute (ACI) Committee 317. ( 1990). “Standard specifications for tolerances for concrete construction and materials” (ACI 117-90) and “Commentary” (ACI 117R-90), Detroit.
2.
Arizona Registrar of Contractors (AROC). ( 1997). A guide for contractors: Minimum workmanship for licensed contractors, Phoenix, Ariz.
3.
ASTM. ( 1996). Annual book of standards, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa.
4.
Bondy, K. B. ( 2000). “Performance evaluation of residential concrete foundations.” Tech. Notes, 9, 1–6.
5.
Boone, S. J. (1996). “Ground-movement-related building damage.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 122(11), 886–896.
6.
Day, R. W. (1990). “Differential movement of slab-on-grade structures.”J. Perf. Constr. Fac., ASCE, 4(4), 236–241.
7.
Devore, J. L. ( 1991). Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences, 3rd Ed., Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, Calif.
8.
Koenig, A. S. ( 1991). “Relative elevation data analysis on newly constructed residential foundations.” Paper Presented to the ASCE Texas Section Spring Meeting, San Antonio, Texas, Available through the Expansive Clay Research Institute, San Antonio, Tex.
9.
Marsh, E. T., and Thoeny, S. A. (1999). “Damage and distortion criteria for residential slab-on-grade structures.”J. Perf. Constr. Fac., ASCE, 13(3), 121–127.
10.
Skempton, A. W., and MacDonald, D. H. ( 1956). “The allowable settlements of buildings.” Proc., Instn. Civ. Engrs., 5(3), 727–768.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Received: Sep 19, 2000
Published online: Nov 1, 2001
Published in print: Nov 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.