Performance Evaluation of Existing Bridge Fenders for Ship Impact
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 15, Issue 1
Abstract
Bridge fender systems are used to guide vessels through navigational channels under bridges. They appear to be an attractive and inexpensive solution for protecting the integrity of bridge piers. However, until now the fenders have not been designed to withstand any specific lateral design force. Thus, their existing impact capacity is unknown. The paper presents results of the research project funded by the Florida Department of Transportation aimed at evaluating the crashworthiness of the system and developing possible retrofit recommendations. The research efforts concentrated on computational analysis of a Jumbo Hopper barge impacting a commonly constructed fender. LS-DYNA, a nonlinear explicit dynamic finite-element code, was used for analysis. Various initial velocities and impact angles were used to represent possible collision conditions. Computational analyses were adopted to assess the crashworthiness performance of the constructed fender system and to identify its weakest components for possible retrofit. It appears that such retrofits could further improve the energy absorbing capabilities of existing bridge fenders.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). ( 1991). “Guide specification and commentary for vessel collision design of highway bridges.” Rep. I-GVCB-1, Washington, D.C.
2.
Atlantic Coast of North America tidal current tables. (1992). U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and National Ocean Service (NOS), Washington, D.C.
3.
Balder, A. P. ( 1986). Mariner's atlas: Southeast Florida & the Florida Keys, Chartcrafters, Baltimore.
4.
Balder, A. P. ( 1988). Mariner's atlas: The Florida Gulf Coast & the Florida Keys, Gulf Publishing Company, Houston.
5.
Chart-kit: Region VIII, Florida West Coast. (1979). Better Boating Association, Needham, Mass.
6.
Cofer, W. F., McLean, D. I., Paynter, M. E., and Wang, H. ( 2000). “The structural evaluation of fender systems for offshore applications.” Proc., 14th Engrg. Mech. Conf., EM 2000.
7.
Gilbert, C., Kreja, I., and Wekezer, J. W. ( 1998). “Computer impact simulation in retrofit analysis of concrete bridge barriers.” Proc., 12th ASCE Engrg. Mech. Div. Conf., La Jolla, Calif., 150–153.
8.
Habibagahi, K., and Langner, J. A. ( 1984). “Horizontal subgrade modulus of granular soil.” Laterally loaded deep foundations: Analysis and performance, J. A. Langner, E. T. Mosley, and C. D. Thompson, eds., ASTM, West Conshohoken, Pa., 21–34.
9.
Hendricks, B. F., and Wekezer, J. W. ( 1996). “Finite element modeling of G2 guardrail.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1528: Highway and facility design. Current research on roadside safety features, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 130–137.
10.
LS-DYNA keyword user's manual: Nonlinear dynamic analysis of structures in three dimensions. (1999). Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore, Calif.
11.
Malvar, L. J., Crawford, J. E., Wesevich, J. W., and Simons, D. ( 1997). “A plasticity concrete material model for DYNA3D.” Int. J. Impact Engrg., Oxford, U.K., 19(9–10), 847–873.
12.
Plaxico, C. A., Patzner, G. S., and Ray, M. H. ( 1998). “Response of guardrail posts under parametric variation of wood and soil strength.” Proc., Transp. Res. Board 77th Annu. Meeting, Washington, D.C.
13.
Federal Highway Administration/National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, National Crash Analysis Center, Washington, D.C., 〈http://www.ncac.gwu.edu〉.
14.
Ray, M. H., and Patzner, G. S. ( 1997). “A finite element model of the modified eccentric loader breakaway cable terminal (MELT).” FHWA vehicle crash analysis. Conf. Proc. Rep. FHWA-RD-96-212, Washington, D.C., 33–53.
15.
Reid, J. D., and Sicking, D. L. ( 1998). “Design and simulation of a sequential kinking guardrail terminal.” Int. J. Impact Engrg., Oxford, U.K., 21(9), 761–772.
16.
SAP2000: Integrated finite element analysis and design of structures. (1998). Computers and Structures, Berkeley, Calif.
17.
Tabiei, A., and Wu, J. ( 2000). “Roadmap for crashworthiness finite element simulation of roadside safety structures.” Finite Elements in Anal. and Des., Amsterdam, 34(2), 145–157.
18.
Tsinker, G. P. ( 1995). Marine structures engineering: Specialized applications, Chapman & Hall, London.
19.
Wekezer, J., Wuttrich, R., and Ramaley, M. (2000). “Performance problems and structural retrofit analysis of existing BCTs.”J. Perf. Constr. Fac., ASCE, 14(3), 118–125.
20.
Wekezer, J. W., Gilbert, C., and Kreja, I. ( 1997). “Conceptual analysis of an aesthetic bridge barrier.” Final Rep., Proj. No. WPI-0510750, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee.
21.
Whirley, R. G., and Engelmann, B. E. ( 1993). DYNA3D: A nonlinear, explicit, three-dimensional finite element code for solid and structural mechanics—Users manual, UCRL-MA-107254, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, Calif.
22.
Wilson, C. M. D. ( 2000). “Investigation of bridge fender systems for barge impact.” MS thesis, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 15 • Issue 1 • February 2001
Pages: 17 - 23
History
Received: Jun 26, 2000
Published online: Feb 1, 2001
Published in print: Feb 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.