Common Causes of Retaining-Wall Distress: Case Study
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 10, Issue 1
Abstract
Poor performance of cantilever retaining walls has been observed at many sites in Southern California during postconstruction investigations. It was found that, in many cases, distress occurred because the walls were constructed outside of the original design criteria. Our studies indicate that during mass grading development projects, walls are frequently designed using soil parameters obtained during a preliminary soil investigation. When actual construction of a given wall begins, conditions encountered sometimes vary dramatically from what was originally expected or intended. Unless the soil design criteria are reevaluated and modifications made to the original wall design, an inadequate wall may be constructed and over time according distress will occur.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Canadian Geotechnical Society. (1985). Canadian foundation engineering manual, 2nd Ed., BiTech, Vancouver, Canada.
2.
Coduto, D. P. (1994). Foundation design principles and practices . Table 23-1, 671.
3.
O'Rourke, T. D., and Jones, C. J. F. P. (1990). “Overview of earth retention systems: 1970–1990.”Des. and Perf. of Earth Retaining Struct., Geotech. Spec. Publ. No. 25, P. C. Lambe and L. A. Hansen, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 22–51.
4.
Terzaghi, K., and Peck, R. B. (1967). Soil mechanics in engineering practice, 2nd Edition, John Wiley, New York, N.Y.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Feb 1, 1996
Published in print: Feb 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.