Regional Flood Peak and Volume Estimation in Northern Canadian Basin
Publication: Journal of Cold Regions Engineering
Volume 14, Issue 4
Abstract
It is often necessary to estimate extreme events at sites where little or no hydrometric data are available. In such cases, one may use a regional estimation procedure, utilizing data available from other stations in the same hydrologic region. In general, a regional flood frequency procedure consists of two steps, delineation of hydrologically homogeneous regions and regional estimation. This paper focuses on the development of a regional flood frequency procedure based on canonical correlation analysis (CCA) and its application to data from a northern Canadian basin in which floods are dominated by spring snowmelt. This CCA-based procedure allows the joint regional estimation of spring flood peaks and volumes. The CCA method allows the determination of pairs of canonical variables such that the correlation between the canonical variables of one pair is maximized and between the variables of different pairs is equal to zero. Therefore, it is possible to infer hydrological canonical variables, knowing the physiographical-meteorological canonical variables. The methodology developed was applied to the St. Maurice River basin system, which is operated by Hydro-Quebec and characterized by the relatively low precision of flow data available. Results show that the proposed method allows for a significant reduction in the 100-year spring flood and volume quantile estimation bias and mean square error. The study also shows that, in 60% of cases, the method that was previously used overestimates quantile values, which leads to an overdesign of retention structures.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Burn, D. H. ( 1990). “Evaluation of regional flood frequency analysis with a region of influence approach.” Water Resour. Res., 26(10); 2257–2265.
2.
Cavadias, G. S. ( 1989). “Regional flood estimation by canonical correlation.” Proc., 1989 Conf. of the Can. Soc. of Civ. Engrs., 11A, 212–231.
3.
Cunnane, C. ( 1988). “Methods and merits of regional flood frequency analysis.” J. Hydro., Amsterdam, 100, 269–290.
4.
Dalrymple, T. ( 1960). “Flood frequency analysis.” Water Supply Paper 1543A, U.S. Geological Survey.
5.
GREHYS. ( 1996a). “Presentation and review of some methods for regional flood frequency analysis.” J. Hydro., Amsterdam, 186(1-4), 63–84.
6.
GREHYS. ( 1996b). “Intercomparison of flood frequency procedures for Canadian rivers.” J. Hydro., Amsterdam, 186(1-4), 85–103.
7.
Kshirsagar, A. M. ( 1972). Multivariate analysis, Marcel Dekker, New York.
8.
Mahalanobis, P. C. ( 1936). “On the generalized distance in statistics.” Proc., Nat. Inst. Sci. India, 12, 49–55.
9.
Miller, R. G., Jr. ( 1964). “A trustworthy jack-knife.” Ann. Math. Statistics, 35(4), 1594–1605.
10.
Muirhead, R. J. ( 1982). Aspect of multivariate statistical theory, Wiley, New York.
11.
Ouarda, T. B. M. J., Boucher, G., Rasmussen, P. F., and Bobée, B. ( 1997). “Regionalization of floods by canonical analysis.” Operational water management, J. C. Refsgaard and E. A. Karalis, eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 297–302.
12.
Ouarda, T. B. M. J., Haché, M., and Bobée, B. ( 1998). “Regionalisation des événements hydrologiques extrêmes.” Res. Rep. No. R-534, INRS-Eau, University of Quebec, Ste-Foy, Canada (in French).
13.
Ouarda, T. B. M. J., Lang, M., Bobée, B., Bernier, J., and Bois, P. ( 1999). “Analysis of regional flood models utilized in France and Quebec.” Rev. Sci. Eau, 12(1), 155–182.
14.
Ribeiro-Corréa, J., Cavadias, G. S., Clément, B., and Rousselle, J. ( 1995). “Identification of hydrological neighborhoods using canonical correlation analysis.” J. Hydro., Amsterdam, 173, 71–89.
15.
Stedinger, J. R., and Tasker, G. ( 1985). “Regional hydrological analysis, 1, ordinary, weighted, and generalized least squares compared.” Water Resour. Res., 21(9), 1421–1432.
16.
Stedinger, J. R., and Tasker, G. ( 1986). “Regional hydrological analysis, 2 model-error estimators, estimation of sigma and log Pearson type 3 distributions.” Water Resour. Res., 22(10), 1487–1499.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Cold Regions Engineering
Volume 14 • Issue 4 • December 2000
Pages: 176 - 191
History
Received: Aug 22, 2000
Published online: Dec 1, 2000
Published in print: Dec 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.