The Decision to Haul versus Resuspend for Hopper Dredging
Publication: Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 117, Issue 6
Abstract
When hopper dredges are used in fast‐moving waters relatively far from a dredged‐material disposal site, dredging managers must decide whether to dispose of the material by either hauling the material to a disposal site or resus‐pending the material. Hauling the material to a disposal site decreases the time available for dredging and consequently increases the total time required to dredge a given volume. Disposal of the dredged material by resuspension increases the time available for dredging at the site, but may increase the amount of dredging required downstream. This paper examines the trade‐off between these two strategies using a simple time‐and‐motion model.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Barnard, W. D. (1978). “Prediction and control of dredged material dispersion around dredging and open‐water pipeline disposal operations.” Tech. Report No. DS‐78‐13, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
2.
Brandsma, M. G., and Divioky, D. J. (1976). “Development of models for prediction of short‐term fate of dredged material discharged in the estuarine environment.” Report No. D‐76‐5, U.S. Army Engr. Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss., May.
3.
Ford, D. T. (1986). “Dredged‐material disposal system capacity expansion.” J. Water Res. Plng. and Mgmt., ASCE, 112(2), 277–291.
4.
Lagasse, P. F., Simons, D. B., and Chen, Y. H. (1976). “Thalweg disposal of riverine dredged material.” Dredging and its environmental effects, P. A. Krenkel, J. Harrison, and J. C. Burdick III, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 556–578.
5.
LaSalle, M. W. (1986). “Seasonal restrictions on dredging and disposal operations.” Report No. J650‐86‐007/1366 JAYCOR, U.S. Army Engr. Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
6.
Lund, J. R. (1989). “Economic optimization of advance maintenance dredging I: optimization and economic theory.” Phase I Project Report, U.S. Army Engr. Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss., Apr.
7.
Lund, J. R. (1991). “Dredged material disposal economics.” J. Wtrway., Port, Coast., and Oc. Engrg., ASCE, 117(3), 390–408.
8.
“A mathematical model of the hopper loading process.” Ports and Dredging, 114, 4–5.
9.
Nichols, M., Diaz, R. J., and Schaffner, L. C. (1990). “Effects of hopper dredging and sediment dispersion, Chesapeake Bay.” Envir. Geology and Water Sci., 15(1), 31–43.
10.
Palermo, M. R., and Randall, R. E. (1989). “Economic loading and overflow for dredge scows and hoppers.” Dredging: Technology, environment, mining, Proceedings of 12th World Dredging Congress, J. R. Wilson and V. L. van Dam, eds., World Dredging Mining and Construction, Irvine, Calif., 408–418.
11.
Richardson, T. W. (1984). “Agitation dredging: lessons and guidelines from past projects.” Tech. Report No. HL‐86‐6, U.S. Army Engr. Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
12.
Scheffauer, F. C. (1954). The hopper dredge: its history, development, and operation, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
13.
Stern, E. M., and Stickle, W. B. (1978). “Effects of turbidity and suspended material in aquatic environments.” Tech. Report No. D‐78‐21, U.S. Army Engr. Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
14.
Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. W. W. Norton and Co., New York, N.Y.
15.
Thibodeaux, B. J., and Grimwood, C. (1978). “A study of the effects of agitation dredging.” Proc. Coastal Zone '78, ASCE, New York, N.Y., 2, 1064–1082.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: Nov 1, 1991
Published in print: Nov 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.