Shallow‐Water Waves. II: Data Comparisons
Publication: Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Volume 114, Issue 1
Abstract
Predicted spectral shapes, based on the theory derived in Part I (Resio 1987), appear to agree well with those measured under storm conditions. The results of this paper indicate that, under such conditions, a dynamic balance between wind input and nonlinear fluxes dominates the shape of a spectrum and via this balance also controls the total energy level and related energy losses in waves propagating into shallow water, even into depths less than 33 ft (10 m). The nonlinear flux estimates derived here also provide a quantitative means of evaluating energy losses, even in nonequilibrium conditions. This ability to quantify energy losses due to nonlinear fluxes will be particularly important in modeling waves in complex bathymetries, or in situations of mixed sea‐swell, or when wave generation is taking place at very oblique angles to the coast, and in very shallow water where the nonlinear fluxes can no longer maintain an equilibrium.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Barnett, T. P. (1972). “Observations of wind wave generation and dissipation in the North Sea: implications for the offshore industry.” Presented at 4th Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Tex.
2.
Bouws, E., Gunther, H., Rosenthal, W., and Vincent, C. L. (1985). “Similarity of the wind wave spectrum in finite depth water, Part I.—spectral form.” J. Geophys. Res., 90(C1), 975–986.
3.
Bouws, E., and Komen, G. J. (1983). “On the balance between growth and dissipation in an extreme depth‐limited wind‐sea in the southern North Sea.” J. Phys. Oceanography, 13(9), 1653–1658.
4.
CERC Field Research Facility. (1987). “Preliminary data summaries.” Prepared for the Office, Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army, Washington, D.C., Oct.
5.
Dobson, F. W. (1971). “Measurements of atmospheric pressure on wind‐generated sea waves.” J. Fluid Mech., 48(1), 91–127.
6.
Forristall, G. Z. (1981). “Measurements of a saturated range in ocean wave spectra.” J. Geophys. Res., 86(9), 8075–8084.
7.
Grant, W. D., and Madsen, O. S. (1979). “Combine wave and current interaction with a rough bottom.” J. Geophys. Res., 84(4), 1797–1808.
8.
Hasselmann, K., et al. (1973). “Measurements of wind‐wave growth and swell decay during the joint North Sea wave project JONSWAP.” Deutsche Hydrogr. Zeit., 8(12), (Suppl. A8).
9.
Iwagaki, Y., and Kakinuma, T. (1967). “On the bottom friction factors off five Japanese coasts.” Coastal Eng. Jpn., 10, 13–22.
10.
Kahma, K. K. (1981). “A study of the growth of the wave spectrum with fetch.” J. Phys. Oceanography, 11, Nov., 1503–1515.
11.
Kitaigorodskii, S. A. (1983). “On the theory of the equilibrium range in the spectrum of wind‐generated gravity waves.” J. Phys. Oceanography, 13, May, 816–827.
12.
Resio, D. T. (1987). “Shallow‐water waves. I: theory,” J. Wtrway., Port, Coast., and Oc. Engrg., 113(3), 264–281.
13.
Thompson, E. F., and Vincent, C. L. (1984). “Shallow water wave height parameters.” J. Wtrway., Port, Coast., and Oc. Engrg., 110(2), 293–299.
14.
Van Ieperen, M. P. (1975). “The bottom friction of the sea‐bed Off Melkbosstrand, South Africa: a comparison of a quaaratic with a linear friction model,” Deutsche Hydrogr. Zeit., 28(2), 72–88.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1988
Published in print: Jan 1988
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.