TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jul 1, 2008

Inexact Chance-Constrained Linear Programming Model for Optimal Water Pollution Management at the Watershed Scale

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 134, Issue 4

Abstract

An inexact chance-constrained linear programming (ICCLP) model for optimal water pollution management at the watershed scale was developed. We selected the net expenditures of the alternative strategies, including initial capital investment and operating costs, as the objectives of water pollution management. The total environmental capacity of the water bodies at different probability levels (qi) was considered a key constraint; other constraints included in the model were government minimum requirements on farmland area, land cover, treatment rate of domestic wastewater and rural wastes, and certain technical constraints. The ICCLP model was applied to Lake Qionghai watershed in China for water quality improvement with the goal of achieving a minimum total cost. Alternative strategies were incorporated following discussions with shareholders and experts. A three-period optimization was conducted based on the alternative strategies; the model parameters were based on field investigations. Five probability levels were considered in the model: qi=0.01 , 0.25, 0.50. 0.90, and 0.99. The model results showed that the total optimized costs were between US $[55,710.86,80,691.81]×104 and US $[72,151.39,101,338.6]×104 under different probability levels. The model results indicate that soil erosion treatment, nonpoint source control measures, and rural waste treatment have much higher costs than other strategies, and our findings indicate that the ICCLP model can effectively deal with optimal water pollution management under uncertainty at the watershed scale.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This paper was supported by the “National Basic Research (973) Program” Project (Grant No. UNSPECIFIED2005CB724205) of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China.

References

Azaiez, M. N., Hariga, M., and Al-Harkan, I. (2005). “A chance-constrained multi-period model for a special multi-reservoir system.” Comput. Oper. Res., 32, 1337–1351.
Chang, N. B., Wen, C. G., and Chen, Y. L. (1997). “A fuzzy multi-objective programming approach for optimal management of the reservoir watershed.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 99(2), 289–302.
Chapra, S. C. (1997). Surface water-quality modeling, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Dórner, S., Swayne, D. A., Rudra, R. P., and Newald, C. (2001). “Integrating parametric uncertainty and modeling results into an advisory system for watershed management.” Adv. Environ. Res., 5(4), 445–451.
Ells, A., Bulte, E., and vanKooten, G. C. (1997). “Uncertainty and forest land use allocation in British Columbia: Vague priorities and imprecise coefficients.” Forest Sci., 43(4), 509–520.
Gitau, M. W., Veith, T. L., and Gburek, W. J. (2004). “Farm-level optimization of BMP placement for cost-effective pollution reductions.” Trans. ASAE, 47(6), 1923–1931.
Huang, G. H. (1998). “A hybrid inexact-stochastic water management model.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 107(1), 137–158.
Huang, G. H., and Loucks, D. P. (2000). “An inexact two-stage stochastic programming model for water resources management under uncertainty.” Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst., 17(2), 95–118.
Kramer, D. B., Polasky, S., and Starfield, A. (2006). “A comparison of alternative strategies for cost-effective water quality management in lakes.” Environ. Manage. (N.Y.), 38(3), 411–425.
Li, Y. P., Huang, G. H., Nie, S. L., and Huang, Y. F. (2006). “IFTSIP: Interval fuzzy two-stage stochastic mixed-integer linear programming: A case study for environmental management and planning.” Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst., 23(2), 73–99.
Liu, L., Huang, G. H., Liu, Y., and Fuller, G. A. (2003). “A fuzzy-stochastic robust programming model for regional air quality management under uncertainty.” Eng. Optimiz., 35(2), 177–199.
Liu, Y, Guo, H. C., and Wang, L. J. (2006a). “Dynamic phosphorus budget for lake-watershed ecosystems.” J. Environ. Sci. (China), 18(3), 596–603.
Liu, Y., Guo, H. C., and Wang, L. J. (2006b). “Watershed approach as a framework for lake-watershed pollution control.” Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 26(2), 337–344 (in Chinese).
Liu, Y., Guo, H. C., Zhang, Z. X., Wang, L. J., Dai, Y. L., and Fan, Y. Y. (2007). “An optimization method based on scenario analyses for watershed management under uncertainty.” Environ. Manage. (N.Y.), 39(5), 678–690.
Loucks, D. P., Stedinger, J. R., and Haith, D. A. (1981). Water resource systems planning and analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Luo, B., Li, J. B., and Huang, G. H. (2006). “A simulation-based interval two-stage stochastic model for agricultural nonpoint source pollution control through land retirement.” Sci. Total Environ., 361(1–3), 38–56.
Morgan, D. R., Eheart, J. W., and Valocchi, A. J. (1993). “Aquifer remediation design under uncertainty using a new chance constrained programming technique.” Water Resour. Res., 29(3), 551–568.
Randhir, T. O., Lee, J. G., and Engel, B. (2000). “Multiple criteria dynamic spatial optimization to manage water quality on a watershed scale.” Trans. ASAE, 43(2), 291–299.
Sohrabi, T. M., Shirmohammadi, A., and Chu, T. W. (2003). “Uncertainty analysis of hydrologic and water quality predictions for a small watershed using SWAT2000.” Environ. Forensics, 4(44), 229–238.
Srivastava, P., Hamlett, J. M., and Robillard, P. D. (2003). “Watershed optimization of agricultural best management practices: Continuous simulation versus design storms.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39(5), 1043–1054.
Srivastava, P., Hamlett, J. M., Robillard, P. D., and Day, R. L. (2002). “Watershed optimization of best management practices using Ann AGNPS and a genetic algorithm.” Water Resour. Res., 38(3), 1021.
Veith, T. L., Wolfe, M. L., and Heatwole, C. D. (2003). “Optimization procedure for cost effective BMP placement at a watershed scale.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39(6), 1331–1343.
Yulianti, J. S., Lence, B. J., and Johnson, G. V. (1999). “Non-point source water quality management under input information uncertainty.” J. Environ. Manage., 55(3), 199–217.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 134Issue 4July 2008
Pages: 347 - 356

History

Received: Nov 7, 2006
Accepted: Aug 20, 2007
Published online: Jul 1, 2008
Published in print: Jul 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yong Liu
Ph.D. Student, College of Environmental Sciences, Peking Univ., Beijing 100871, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Huaicheng Guo
Professor, College of Environmental Sciences, Peking Univ., Beijing 100871, China (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Feng Zhou
Ph.D. Student, College of Environmental Sciences, Peking Univ., Beijing 100871, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Xiaosheng Qin
Ph.D. Student, Faculty of Engineering, Univ. of Regina, Regina, Sask., Canada S4S 0A2. E-mail: [email protected]
Kai Huang
Ph.D. Student, College of Environmental Sciences, Peking Univ., Beijing 100871, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Yajuan Yu
Ph.D. Student, College of Environmental Sciences, Peking Univ., Beijing 100871, China. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share