TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jan 1, 2008

Incorporating Reliability into the Definition of the Margin of Safety in Total Maximum Daily Load Calculations

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 134, Issue 1

Abstract

In the calculation of the total maximum daily load (TMDL), the margin of safety (MOS) is an attempt to account for the uncertainties related to the conceptual representation of the system and the inherently random nature of the processes under study. In general, the MOS is often the result of arbitrary or poorly supported decisions that have little to do with the reliability of the system. To improve the current practice in TMDL calculations, an enhanced reliability-based MOS is proposed here. The Modified Rosenblueth point estimate method is proposed in this paper as a valuable means to assess the uncertainty of a system, and, thus, its probability of failure. The Modified Rosenblueth method is a less computationally demanding uncertainty analysis technique, and can be easily coupled with deterministic hydraulic and water quality numerical models. A case study on arsenic concentrations in the Niagara River is discussed in this paper. The results of the uncertainty analysis are used to compute the effective risk of exceeding a selected water quality standard. It is shown that use of the uncertainty analysis in assessing the effective risk goes beyond the purely qualitative evaluation of traditional pass-and-fail methods. Moreover, the probability of exceeding a selected water quality standard is applied here to the calculation of the MOS term. Selecting the MOS based on the probability of failure provides a scientifically based definition of the TMDL. A reliability-based MOS enhances the current application of the TMDL by providing more reliable estimates, and is a step forward in making TMDL calculations more practical and standardized.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers would like to thank Donald J. Williams and the Aquatic Sciences and Reporting Ecosystem Health Division Environment Conservation Branch of the Ontario Region in Canada, the US Army Corps of Engineers, Buffalo District, N.Y., and the US Coast Guard, Station Niagara, NY for providing essential information for this study. The work reported in this paper is financially supported by the National Science FoundationNSF Graduate Fellowship, the Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Department, and the Environment and Society Institute at the State University of New York at Buffalo.

References

Allison, J. D., and Allison, T. L. (2005). “Partition coefficients for metals in surface water, soil and waste.” Rep. No. EPA/600/R-05/074, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency—Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.
Blair, S. H., and Atkinson, J. F. (1990). “Contaminant transport modeling in the Niagara River.” Rep. No. 90-10, Great Lakes Program, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, N.Y.
Borsuk, M. E., Stow, C. A., and Reckhow, K. H. (2002). “Predicting the frequency of water quality standard violations: A probabilistic approach for TMDL development.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 36(10), 2109–2115.
Brown, L. C., and Barnwell, T. O. J. (1987). “The enhanced stream water quality models QUAL2E and QUAL2E-UNCAS: Documentation and user's manual.” Rep. No. EPA/600/3-87/077, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Ga.
Chadderton, R. A., Miller, A. C., and McDonnell, A. J. (1982). “Uncertainty analysis of dissolved oxygen model.” J. Envir. Engrg. Div., 108(5), 1003–1013.
Chang, C. H., Tung, Y. K., and Yang, J. C. (1995). “Evaluation of probability point estimate Methods.” Appl. Math. Model., 19(2), 95–105.
Chang, C. H., Yang, J. C., and Tung, Y. K. (1997). “Uncertainty analysis by point estimate methods incorporating marginal distributions.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 123(3), 244–250.
Chang, W. T. (1996). “Analysis of contaminant loadings for the Niagara River.” MS thesis, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, N.Y.
DePinto, J. V., Freedman, P. L., Dilks, D. M., and Larson, W. M. (2004). “Models quantify the total maximum daily load process.” J. Environ. Eng., 130(6), 703–713.
Di Toro, D. M., and van Straten, G. (1979). “Uncertainty in the parameters and predictions of phytoplankton models.” Working Paper No. WP-79-27, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
Dilks, D. W., and Freedman, P. L. (2004). “Improved consideration of the margin of safety in total maximum daily load development.” J. Environ. Eng., 130(6), 690–694.
Franceschini, S. (2004). “Modeling toxic concentrations in the Niagara River under uncertainty.” MS thesis, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, N.Y.
Gates, T. K., and Al-Zahrani, M. A. (1996). “Spatiotemporal stochastic open-channel flow. II: Simulation experiments.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 122(11), 652–661.
Han, K. Y., Kim, S. H., and Bae, D. H. (2001). “Stochastic water quality analysis using reliability method.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 37(3), 695–708.
Jaffe, P. R., and Ferrara, R. A. (1984). “Modeling sediment and water column interactions for hydrophobic pollutants—Parameter discrimination and model response to input uncertainty.” Water Res., 18(9), 1169–1174.
Kao, J. J., and Bau, S. F. (1996). “Risk analysis for flow duration curve based seasonal discharge management programs.” Water Res., 30(6), 1369–1376.
Labiosa, W., Leckie, J., Shachter, R., Freyberg, D., and Trytuba, J. (2005). “Incorporating uncertainty in watershed management decision-making: A mercury TMDL case.” Proc., Watershed Management Conf.: Managing Watersheds for Human and Natural Impacts, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Langseth, D., and Brown, N. (2004). “An approach to establishing risk based margins of safety for total maximum daily loads for phosphorus in lakes.” Proc., World Water and Environmental Resources Congress: Critical Transitions in Water and Environmental Resources Management, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Li, K. S. (1992). “Point estimate method for calculating statistical moments.” J. Eng. Mech., 118(7), 1506–1511.
Lian, Y., and Yen, B. C. (2003). “Comparison of risk calculation methods for a culvert.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 129(2), 140–152.
Loucks, D. P., and Lynn, W. R. (1966). “Probabilistic models for predicting stream quality.” Water Resour. Res., 2(3), 593–605.
Maier, H. R., Lence, B. J., Tolson, B. A., and Foschi, R. O. (2001). “First-order reliability method for estimating reliability, vulnerability, and resilience.” Water Resour. Res., 37(3), 779–790.
Manache, G., and Melching, C. S. (2004). “Sensitivity analysis of a water-quality model using Latin hypercube sampling.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 130(3), 232–242.
Marr, J. K., and Canale, R. P. (1988). “Load allocation for toxics using Monte Carlo techniques.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 60(5), 659–666.
Melching, C. S., and Anmangandla, S. (1992). “Improved first-order uncertainty method for water-quality modeling.” J. Environ. Eng., 118(5), 791–805.
Melching, C. S., and Bauwens, W. (2001). “Uncertainty in coupled nonpoint source and stream water-quality models.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 127(6), 403–413.
Melching, C. S., and Yoon, C. G. (1996). “Key sources of uncertainty in QUAL2E model of Passaic River.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 122(2), 105–113.
Novotny, V. (1999). “Integrating diffuse/nonpoint pollution control and water body restoration into watershed management.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 35(4), 717–727.
Novotny, V. (2004). “Simplified databased total maximum daily loads, or the world is log-normal.” J. Environ. Eng., 130(6), 674–683.
Novotny, V., and Witte, J. W. (1997). “Ascertaining aquatic ecological risks of urban stormwater discharges.” Water Res., 31(10), 2573–2585.
Putuhena, F. J. (1997). “Development of a decision support model for the Niagara River.” Ph.D. thesis, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, N.Y.
Reckhow, K. H. (2003). “On the need for uncertainty assessment in TMDL modeling and implementation.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 129(4), 245–246.
Said, N. M. (1994). “Modeling transport of toxics in the Niagara River.” M.S. thesis, SUNY at Buffalo, Buffalo, N.Y.
Schmidt, A. R. (2004). “Application of point-estimation method to calculate uncertainties in discharges from stage-discharge ratings.” Proc., World Water and Environmental Resources Congress: Critical Transitions in Water and Environmental Resources Management, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Tsai, C. W., and Franceschini, S. (2005). “Evaluation of probabilistic point estimate methods in uncertainty analysis for environmental engineering applications.” J. Environ. Eng., 131(3), 387–395.
Tung, Y.-K., and Hathhorn, W. E. (1988). “Assessment of probability-distribution of dissolved-oxygen deficit.” J. Environ. Eng., 114(6), 1421–1435.
Tung, Y.-K., and Yen, B. C. (2005). Hydrosystems engineering uncertainty analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Ünlü, K. (1994). “Assessing risk of groundwater pollution from land-disposed wastes.” J. Environ. Eng., 120(6), 1578–1597.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1983). “Results of the nationwide urban runoff program.” Water Planning Division, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2003). “Niagara River area of concern.” ⟨http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/aoc/niagara.html⟩ (October 23, 2005).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2005). “Watershed and water quality modeling technical support center.” Athens, Ga., ⟨http://www.epa.gov/athens/wwqtsc/index.html⟩ (October 23, 2005).
Vemula, V. R. S., Mujumdar, P. P., and Ghosh, S. (2004). “Risk evaluation in water quality management of a river system.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 130(5), 411–423.
Warwick, J. J. (1989). “Interplay between parameter uncertainty and model aggregation error.” Water Resour. Bull., 25(2), 275–283.
Warwick, J. J., and Cale, W. G. (1986). “Determining the likelihood of obtaining a reliable model.” J. Environ. Eng., 113(5), 1102–1119.
Wool, T., Ambrose, B., Comer, A., Martin, J., Greenfield, J., and Davie, S. (2005). “Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP) Version 7.1.” United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Athens, Ga., computer program.
Yen, B. C. (1988). “Stochastic methods and reliability analysis in water resources.” Adv. Water Resour., 11(3), 115–122.
Yu, P. S., Yang, T. C., and Chen, S. J. (2001). “Comparison of uncertainty analysis methods for a distributed rainfall-runoff model.” J. Hydrol., 244(1–2), 43–59.
Yulianti, J. S., Lence, B. J., Johnson, G. V., and Takyi, A. K. (1999). “Non-point source water quality management under input information uncertainty.” J. Environ. Manage., 55(3), 199–217.
Zhang, H. X., and Yu, S. L. (2004). “Applying the first-order error analysis in determining the margin of safety for total maximum daily load computations.” J. Environ. Eng., 130(6), 664–673.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 134Issue 1January 2008
Pages: 34 - 44

History

Received: Dec 16, 2005
Accepted: Nov 30, 2006
Published online: Jan 1, 2008
Published in print: Jan 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Samuela Franceschini, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Research Assistant, Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, State Univ. of New York at Buffalo, 207 Jarvis Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260. E-mail: [email protected]
Christina W. Tsai, M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering, State Univ. of New York at Buffalo, 233 Jarvis Hall, Buffalo, NY 14260 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share