TECHNICAL PAPERS
Oct 15, 2004

Reliability-Based Approach to Multicriteria Decision Analysis for Water Resources

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 130, Issue 6

Abstract

Analyses of water resource allocation problems can be undertaken using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA), yet various sources of uncertainty exist in the application of MCDA methods, including the definition of criteria weights and the assignment of criteria performance values. Sensitivity analysis can be used to analyze the effects of these uncertainties on the ranking of alternatives; however, many existing methods have been found to have numerous limitations when applied to MCDA. In this paper, a reliability-based approach is proposed that enables the decision maker to examine the robustness of a solution, allowing a decision to be made with confidence that the alternative chosen is the best performing alternative under the range of probable circumstances. The proposed stochastic method involves defining the uncertainty in the input values using probability distributions, performing a reliability analysis by Monte Carlo simulation and undertaking a significance analysis using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. The outcomes of the approach include a distribution of the total values of each alternative based upon the expected range of input parameter values. The benefits of the approach are illustrated by applying it to two water resources case studies.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Barron, H., and Schmidt, P. (1988). “Sensitivity analysis of additive multiattribute value models.” Oper. Res., 36(1), 122–127.
2.
Brans, J. P., Vincke, P., and Mareschal, B. (1986). “How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 24, 228–238.
3.
Choi, D. J., and Park, H. (2001). “Analysis of water privatization scenarios in Korea with multi-criteria decision making techniques.” Aqua, 50(6), 335–352.
4.
Critchfield, G. C., and Willard, K. E. (1986). “Probabilistic analysis of decision trees using Monte Carlo simulation.” Med. Decis Making, 6(1), 85–92.
5.
Felli, J. C., and Hazen, G. B. (1998). “Sensitivity analysis and the expected value of perfect information.” Med. Decis Making, 18(1), 95–109.
6.
Fleming, N., (1999). “Sustainability and water resources management for the Northern Adelaide Plains, South Australia.” PhD thesis, Univ. of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
7.
Flug, M., Seitz, H. L. H., and Scott, J. F. (2000). “Multicriteria decision analysis applied to Glen Canyon Dam.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 126(5), 270–276.
8.
Hajkowicz, S., Young, M., Wheeler, S., MacDonald, D., and Young, D. (2000). “Supporting decisions: understanding natural resource management assessment techniques.” Report prepared for Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corp., CSIRO, Land and Water, Adelaide, Australia.
9.
Helton, J. C. (1993). “Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal.” Reliability Eng. Sys. Safety, 42, 327–367.
10.
Janssen, R. (1996). Multiobjective decision support for environmental management, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
11.
Kheireldin, K., and Fahmy, H. (2001). “Multi-criteria approach for evaluating long term water strategies.” Water Int., 26(4), 527–535.
12.
Kottegoda, N.T., and Rosso, R. (1997). Statistics, probability, and reliability for civil and environmental engineers, McGraw-Hill, Singapore.
13.
Larichev, O. I., and Moshkovich, H. M. (1995). “ZAPROS-LM: A method and system for ordering multiattribute alternatives.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 82, 503–521.
14.
Mareschal, B. (1988). “Weight stability intervals in multicriteria decision aid.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 33, 54–64.
15.
Moshkovich, H.M., Schellenberger, R.E., and Olson, D.L. (1998). “Data influences the result more than preferences: Some lessons from implementation of multiattribute techniques in a real decision task.” Decision Support Systems, 22(1), 73–84.
16.
Mousseau, V., Figueira, J., Dias, L., Gomes da Silva, C., and Climaco, J. (2003). “Resolving inconsistencies among constraints on the parameters of an MCDA model.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 147(1), 72–93.
17.
Netto, O. C., Parent, E., and Duckstein, L. (1996). “Multicriterion design of long-term water supply in southern France.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 122(6), 403–413.
18.
Palisade Corporation. (2000). @Risk: 4.0.5 Professional Edition, Newfield, N.Y.
19.
Raju, K. S., Duckstein, L., and Arondel, C. (2000). “Multicriterion analysis for sustainable water resources planning: A case study in Spain.” Water Resour. Manage.. 14(6), 435–456.
20.
Rietveld, P., and Ouwersloot, H. (1992). “Ordinal data in multicriteria decision making: a stochastic dominance approach to siting nuclear power plants.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 56, 249–262.
21.
Ringuest, J. L. (1997). “Lp-metric sensitivity analysis for single and multi-attribute decision analysis.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 98, 563–570.
22.
Rios Insua, D. (1990). Sensitivity analysis in multi-objective decision making, Springer, Berlin.
23.
Roy, B., and Vincke, P. (1981). “Multicriteria analysis: Survey and new directions.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 8(3), 207–218.
24.
Soofi, E. S. (1990). “Generalized entropy-based weights for multiattribute value models.” Oper. Res., 38(2), 362–363.
25.
Tecle, A., Fogel, M., and Duckstein, L. (1988). “Multicriterion selection of wastewater management alternatives.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 114(4), 383–398.
26.
Triantaphyllou, E., and Sanchez, A. (1997). “A sensitivity analysis approach for some deterministic multi-criteria decision-making methods.” Decision Sci., 28(1), 151–194.
27.
Wolters, W. T. M., and Mareschal, B. (1995). “Novel types of sensitivity analysis for additive MCDM methods.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 81, 281–290.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 130Issue 6November 2004
Pages: 429 - 438

History

Published online: Oct 15, 2004
Published in print: Nov 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kylie M. Hyde
Postgraduate Student, Centre for Applied Modelling in Water Engineering, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Holger R. Maier
Senior Lecturer, Centre for Applied Modelling in Water Engineering, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Chris B. Colby
Senior Lecturer, Centre for Applied Modelling in Water Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, Univ. of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share