TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jun 15, 2004

Managing Surface Water-Groundwater to Restore Fall Flows in the Cosumnes River

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 130, Issue 4

Abstract

Declining fall flows are limiting the ability of the Cosumnes River to support large fall runs of Chinook salmon. Management scenarios linking surface water and groundwater alternatives to provide sufficient fall flows are examined using groundwater flow and channel routing models. Results show that groundwater overdraft in the basin has converted the river to a predominantly losing stream, practically eliminating base flows. Management alternatives to increase net recharge (for example, pumping reductions) were examined along with surface water augmentation options. Using a minimum depth standard for fish passage, average surface water flow deficits were computed for the migration period of Chinook salmon. Groundwater deficits were evaluated by comparing simulated current groundwater conditions with conditions under various scenarios. Increases in net recharge on the order of 200 to 300 million m3/year would be required to reconnect the regional aquifer with the channel and in turn reestablish perennial base flows. Options that combine surface water augmentation with groundwater management are most likely to ensure sufficient river flows in the short term and to support long-term restoration of regional groundwater levels.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Anderson, M. (1993). “Development of a general diffusion wave routing routine.” Masters thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, Calif.
Anderson, M. L., Chen, Z. Q., and Kavvas, M. L.(2004). “Modeling low flows on the Cosumnes River.” J. Hydrol. Eng., 9(2), 126–134.
Bouwer, H., and Maddock, III, T.(1997). “Making sense of the interactions between groundwater and streamflow: Lessons for water masters and adjudicators.” Rivers, 6(1), 19–31.
California Department of Water Resources (DWR). (1974). “Evaluation of ground water resources, Sacramento County.” DWR Bulletin No. 118-3, Sacramento, Calif.
Chen, M., and Soulsby, C. (1997). “Modelling stream-aquifer interactions: A case study of environmental risk assessment for a proposed groundwater abstraction scheme in northeast Scotland.” Sustainability of water resources under increasing uncertainty, D. Rosbjerg, ed., International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, U.K.
Criss, R. E., and Davisson, M. L.(1996). “Isotopic imaging of surface water/groundwater interactions, Sacramento Valley, California.” J. Hydrol., 178, 205–222.
Drake, D. J., Tate, K. W., and Carlson, H.(2000). “Analysis shows climate-caused decreases in Scott River fall flows.” California Agriculture Mag., 54(6), 46–49.
Fleckenstein, J., Suzuki, E., and Fogg, G. E. (2001). “Options for conjunctive water management to restore fall flows in the Cosumnes River basin, California.” Publ. No. 272, Integrated water resources management, M. A. Mariño and S. P. Simonovic, eds., International Association of Hydrologic Sciences, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, U.K., 175–182.
Glennon, R. J. (2002). Water follies, groundwater pumping and the Fate of America’s Fresh Water, Island Press, Washington, D.C.
Guay, J. R., Harmon, J. G., and McPherson, K. R. (1998). “Flood inundation map and water-surface profiles for floods of selected recurrence intervals, Cosumnes River and Deer Creek, Sacramento County, California.” Open file rep., 98-283, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
Kaleris, V.(1998). “Quantifying the exchange rate between groundwater and small streams.” J. Hydraul. Res., 36(6), 913–932.
Kondolf, G. M., Maloney, L. M., and Williams, J. G.(1987). “Effects of bank storage and well pumping on base flow, Carmel River, Monterey County, California.” J. Hydrol., 91, 351–369.
LaBolle, E. M., Ahmed, A. A., and Fogg, G. E.(2003). “Review of the integrated groundwater and surface-water model (IGSM).” Ground Water, 41(2), 238–246.
Lines, G. C. (1996). “Ground-water and surface-water relations along the Mojave River, Southern California.” Water-resources investigations rep. 95-4189, U.S. Geological Survey/Mojave Water Agency (Calif.), Denver, Colo.
Montgomery Watson (MW). (1993a). County groundwater model: Model development and basin groundwater yield, Sacramento County Water Agency, Sacramento, Calif.
Montgomery Watson (MW). (1993b). Integrated groundwater and surface water model: Documentation and user manual, Sacramento, Calif.
Montgomery Watson (MW). (1997). “Baseline conditions for groundwater yield analysis.” Rep. Prepared for the Sacramento County Water Agency, Sacramento, Calif.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V.(1970). “River forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1: A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290.
Nobi, N., and DasGupta, A.(1997). “Simulation of regional flow and salinity intrusion in an integrated stream-aquifer system in coastal region: Southwest region of Bangladesh.” Ground Water, 35(5), 786–796.
Pelka, W., and Horst, R. (1989). “Finite element combined surface water/groundwater model for the river Rhine Kehl/Strabourg reservoir.” Groundwater management: quantity and quality, A. Sahuquillo, J. Andreu, and T. O’Donnell, eds., International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, U.K.
Perkins, S. P., and Sophocleous, M.(1999). “Development of a comprehensive watershed model applied to study stream yield under drought conditions.” Ground Water, 37(3), 418–426.
Philip Williams and Associates (PWA). (1997). Analysis of opportunities for restoring a natural flood regime on the Cosumnes River floodplain, San Francisco.
Pucci, A. A., and Pope, D. A.(1995). “Simulated effects of development on regional ground-water/surface-water interactions in the Northern Coastal Plain of New Jersey.” J. Hydrol., 167, 241–262.
Ramireddygari, S. R., Sophocleous, M. A., Koelliker, J. K., Perkins, S. P., and Govindaraju, R. S.(2000). “Development and application of a comprehensive simulation model to evaluate impacts of watershed structures and irrigation water use on streamflow and groundwater: The case of Wet Walnut Creek Watershed, Kansas, USA.” J. Hydrol., 236, 223–246.
Rorabaugh, M. I. (1964). “Estimating changes in bank storage and groundwater contributions to streamflow.” Publ. 63, International Association of Scientific Hydrology, Wallingford, U.K., 432–441.
Rushton, K. R., and Tomlinson, L. M.(1979). “Possible mechanisms for leakage between aquifers and rivers.” J. Hydrol., 40, 49–65.
Sophocleous, M.(2002). “Interactions between groundwater and surface water: The state of the science.” Hydrogeol. J., 10(1), 52–67.
Sophocleous, M., and Perkins, S. P.(2000). “Methodology and application of combined watershed and groundwater models in Kansas.” J. Hydrol., 236, 185–201.
Theis, C. V.(1941). “The effect of a well on the flow of a nearby stream.” Am. Geophys. Union Trans., 22(3), 734–738.
The Nature Conservancy (TNC). (1997). “Alternatives for reestablishing fall attraction flows for Chinook salmon on the Cosumnes River.” Internal Memo, Arlington, Va.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). (1995). Draft anadromous fish restoration plan: A plan to increase natural production of anadromous fish in the Central Valley of California, Sacramento, Calif.
Winter, T. C.(1995). “Recent advances in understanding the interaction of groundwater and surface water.” Rev. Geophys., 33(S), 985–994.
Winter, T. C., Harvey, J. W., Franke, O. L., and Alley, W. M. (1999). “Ground water and surface water: A single resource.” Circular 1139, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
Woessner, W. W.(2000). “Stream and fluvial plain ground water interactions: Rescaling hydrogeologic thought.” Ground Water, 38(3), 423–429.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 130Issue 4July 2004
Pages: 301 - 310

History

Received: Jan 24, 2003
Accepted: Jul 3, 2003
Published online: Jun 15, 2004
Published in print: Jul 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jan Fleckenstein
PhD Candidate, Hydrologic Sciences Graduate Group, Univ. of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616.
Michael Anderson
Postgraduate Researcher, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616.
Graham Fogg
Professor, Hydrologic Sciences Graduate Group, Dept. of Land, Air and Water Resources and Dept. of Geology, Univ. of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616.
Jeffrey Mount
Professor and Chair, Institute for Watershed Science and Management and Dept. of Geology, Univ. of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share