Uncertainty in Coupled Nonpoint Source and Stream Water-Quality Models
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 127, Issue 6
Abstract
Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) and the mean first-order reliability method are applied to determine the parameters significantly affecting uncertainty in the simulated dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations at the point in the Zenne River in Brussels, most prone to low concentrations. The DO simulation involves the coupling of a nonpoint pollution load model, a constant treatment efficiency model, and a river water-quality model. LHS found that six of the 53 model parameters significantly contribute to the variance of the annual mean DO concentration, and five model parameters significantly contribute to the variance in the number of hours that DO concentrations are <2 mg/L. The mean first-order reliability method found that these parameters accounted for 73.6 and 84.7% of the variance in the respective output features. Reanalysis with LHS, letting only these six parameters be uncertain, confirmed the identification of these parameters as accounting for 78.1 and 83.0% of the respective variances. The identification of key sources of uncertainty provided insight with respect to treatment plant operation, model improvements, and data collection programs.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Baeyens, J., Hosten, L., and Van Vaerenbergh, E. ( 1995). “Afvalwaterzuivering.” Handboeken Stichting Leefmilieu 12, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
2.
Bauwens, W., Vanrolleghem, P., and Smeets, M. ( 1996). “An evaluation of the efficiency of the combined sewer-wastewater treatment system under transient conditions.” Water Sci. and Technol., 33(2), 199–208.
3.
Beck, M. B. ( 1987). “Water quality modeling: A review of the analysis of uncertainty.” Water Resour. Res., 23(5), 1393–1441.
4.
Brown, L. C., and Barnwell, T. O., Jr. ( 1987). “The enhanced stream water quality models QUAL2E and QUAL2E-UNCAS: Documentation and user manual.” Rep. No. EPA/600/3-87/007, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
5.
Chow, V. T. ( 1959). Open channel hydraulics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
6.
Covar, A. P. ( 1976). “Selecting the proper reaeration coefficient for use in water-quality models.” Proc., Conf. on Envir. Simulation and Modeling, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati.
7.
Demuynck, C., and Bauwens, W. ( 1996). “Modelling of the water quality of the River Zenne in the Brussels region.” Lab. of Hydro., Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels.
8.
ASCE manual of practice No. 37, ASCE, New York.
9.
Fair, G. M., Geyer, J. C., and Okun, D. A. ( 1971). Elements of water supply and wastewater disposal. Wiley, New York.
10.
Gardner, R. H., O'Neill, R. V., Mankin, J. B., and Carney, J. H. ( 1981). “A comparison of sensitivity and error analysis based on a stream ecosystem model.” Ecological Modeling, 12, 173–190.
11.
Gottschalk, L. C. ( 1964). “Reservoir sedimentation.” Handbook of applied hydrology, V. T. Chow, ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
12.
Harms, R. W., and Kenter, G. ( 1987). “Mischwasserentlastungen, KOSIM V.3.0.” Mikrocomputer in der Stadtenwasserung, Institut fur Technische-Wissenschaftliche Hydrologie, Hannover, Germany.
13.
Iman, R. L., and Helton, J. C. ( 1985). “A comparison of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models.” Rep. No. NUREGICR-3904, SAND 84-1461, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, N.M.
14.
Janssen, P. H. M., Heuberger, P. S. C., and Sanders, R. ( 1992). “UNCSAM 1.1: A software package for sensitivity and uncertainty analysis.” Rep. No. 959101004, National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
15.
Jolankai, G. ( 1992). “Hydrological, chemical and biological processes of contaminant transformation and transport in river and lake systems: A state of the art report.” Tech. Documents in Hydro. Rep. No. IHP-IV Proj. H-3.2, International Hydrological Programme, UNESCO, Paris.
16.
Lopez, F., and Garcia, M. ( 1997). “Probability concepts in sediment transport mechanics.” Environmental and coastal hydraulics: Protecting the aquatic habitat, S. S. Y. Wang and T. Carstens, eds., Vol. 2, ASCE, New York, 1197–1202.
17.
McKay, M. D. ( 1988). “Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis using a statistical sample of input values.” Uncertainty analysis, Y. Ronen, ed., CRC, Boca Raton, Fla., 145–186.
18.
McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., and Conover, W. J. ( 1979). “A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code.” Technometrics, 21(2), 239–245.
19.
Melching, C. S. ( 1995). “Reliability estimation.” Chapter 3, Computer models of watershed hydrology, V. P. Singh, ed., Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colo., 69–118.
20.
Melching, C. S. ( 1999). “Uncertainty analysis for holistic river water-quality management systems.” Final Rep., Ministry of Economics, Brussels.
21.
Melching, C. S., and Bauwens, W. ( 2000). “Comparison of uncertainty—analysis methods applied to simulation of urban water quality.” Stochastic hydraulics 2000, Z.-Y. Wang and S.-Z. Hu, eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 717–725.
22.
Melching, C. S., Yen, B. C., and Wenzel, H. G., Jr. (1991). “Output reliability as guide for selection of rainfall-runoff models.”J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., ASCE, 117(3), 383–398.
23.
Melching, C. S., and Yoon, C. G. (1996). “Key sources of uncertainty in QUAL2E model of Passaic River.”J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., ASCE, 122(2), 105–113.
24.
Metcalf and Eddy Inc. ( 1991). Wastewater engineering: Treatment disposal reuse, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
25.
SALMON-Q user documentation, version 1.0. (1993). Hydraulics Research Wallingford, Howbery Park, Oxfordshire, U.K.
26.
Smeets, M., Raemdonck, N., and Bauwens, W. ( 1995). “A methodology to reduce CSO with additional storage capacity.” Proc., 2nd Int. Symp. on Urban Environments, Vol. 2, 329–334.
27.
Stall, J. B., and Terstriep, M. L. ( 1972). “Storm sewer design—An evaluation of the RRL method.” EPA Technol. Ser. EPA-R2-72-068, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
28.
Tang, W. H., and Yen, B. C. ( 1972). “Hydrologic and hydraulic design under uncertainties.” Proc., Int. Symp. of Uncertainties in Hydro. and Water Resour. Sys., Vol. 2, University of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz., 868–882.
29.
Wollast, R., et al. ( 1992). “Réseau de Surveillance des Écoulements et des Charges Polluantes dans les Collecteurs D'Amenée à la Future Station D'Épuration de Bruxelles—Nord.” Laboratorie de Traitement des Eaux et Pollution, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels.
30.
Yeh, K.-C., and Tung, Y.-K. (1993). “Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of pit-migration model.”J. Hydr. Engrg., ASCE, 119(2), 262–283.
31.
Yevjevich, V. ( 1971). Probability and statistics in hydrology, Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colo.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 127 • Issue 6 • December 2001
Pages: 403 - 413
History
Received: Jul 18, 2000
Published online: Dec 1, 2001
Published in print: Dec 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.