TECHNICAL PAPERS
Feb 1, 2001

Impacts of Vegetative Practices on Suspended Sediment from Watersheds of Arizona

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 127, Issue 1

Abstract

Effects of vegetative practices on suspended sediment discharge from ponderosa pine forests and piñon-juniper woodlands in north-central Arizona are examined. Sediment-rating curves were developed to analyze the impacts. Disturbance from vegetative practices generally increased suspended sediment transport above those of control (reference) watersheds. Completely cleared and strip-cut ponderosa pine watersheds produced higher sediment concentrations than did a control watershed. Likewise, cabled and herbicide-treated piñon-juniper watersheds yielded higher sediment-laden streamflows than did a control. Sediment transport regimes are also related to streamflow-generation mechanisms and hydrograph stages. Although about 85% of the data analyzed represented snowmelt-runoff events in both vegetative types, derivation of sediment-rating curves based on streamflow-generation mechanisms improved the sensitivity of the analysis. Sediment data collected during rising and falling hydrograph stages varied between the two vegetative types. Sediment concentrations were generally higher in the rising stage than in the falling stage for ponderosa pine watersheds. There was no clear evidence of higher sediment concentrations in the rising stage of the hydrograph as compared to the falling stage in the piñon-juniper watersheds.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Anderson, H. W., Hoover, M. D., and Reinhart, K. G. ( 1976). “Forest and water: Effects of forest management on floods, sedimentation, and water supply.” General Tech. Rep. PSW-18, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C.
2.
Baker, M. B., Jr. ( 1982). “Hydrologic regimes of forested areas in the Beaver Creek watershed.” General Tech. Rep. RM-90, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C.
3.
Baker, M. B., Jr. ( 1983). “Influence of slash windrows on streamflow.” Hydro. and Water Resour. in Arizona and the Southwest, 13, 21–25.
4.
Baker, M. B., Jr. ( 1984). “Changes in streamflow in a herbicide-treated pinyon-juniper watershed in Arizona.” Water Resour. Res., 20, 1639–1642.
5.
Baker, M. B., Jr. ( 1986a). “Effects of ponderosa pine treatments on water yield in Arizona.” Water Resour. Res., 22, 67–73.
6.
Baker, M. B., Jr. ( 1986b). “A supercritical flume for measuring sediment-laden streamflow.” Water Resour. Bull., 20, 847–851.
7.
Barr, G. W. ( 1956). “Recovering rainfall.” Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz.
8.
Brooks, K. N., Ffolliott, P. F., Gregersen, H. M., and DeBano, L. F. ( 1997). Hydrology and the management of watersheds, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
9.
Brown, H. E., et al. ( 1974). “Opportunities for increasing water yields and other multiple use values on ponderosa pine forest lands.” Res. Paper RM-129, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C.
10.
Campbell, F. B., and Bauder, H. A. ( 1940). “A rating-curve method for determining silt discharge of streams.” Trans., EOS, Cairo, Egypt, 21, 603–607.
11.
Clary, W. P., Baker, M. B., Jr. O'Connell, P. F., Johnsen, T. N., Jr. and Campbell, R. E. ( 1974). “Effects of pinyon-juniper removal on natural resource products and uses.” Res. Paper RM-128, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C.
12.
Crawford, C. G. ( 1991). “Estimation of suspended-sediment rating curves and mean suspended sediment loads.” J. Hydro., Amsterdam, 129, 331–348.
13.
Duan, N. ( 1983). “Smearing estimate—A nonparametric retransformation method.” J. Am. Statistical Assn., 78, 605–610.
14.
Duff, J. H., Pringle, C. M., and Triska, F. J. ( 1996). “Nitrate reduction in sediments of lowland tropical streams draining swamp forest in Costa Rica: An ecosystem perspective.” Biogeochem., 33, 179–196.
15.
Elliott, J. G., and DeFeyter, K. L. ( 1986). “Sediment-data sources and estimated annual suspended-sediment loads of rivers and streams in Colorado.” USGS Water Resour. Investigations Rep. 86-4344, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver.
16.
Ffolliott, P. F., Gottfried, G. J., and Baker, M. B., Jr. ( 1989). “Water yield from forest snowpack management: Research findings in Arizona and New Mexico.” Water Resour. Res., 25, 199–2007.
17.
Ffolliott, P. F., and Thorud, D. B. ( 1975). “Water yield improvement by vegetation management: Focus on Arizona.” Nat. Tech. Information Service Rep. PB-246 055, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.
18.
Glysson, G. D. ( 1987). “Sediment-transport curves.” USGS Open-File Rep. 87-218, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver.
19.
Grenney, W. J., and Heyse, E. (1985). “Suspended sediment–river flow analysis.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 111(6), 790–803.
20.
Hansen, D., and Bray, D. I. ( 1993). “Single-station estimates of suspended sediment loads using sediment rating curves.” Can. J. Civ. Engrg., Ottawa, 20, 133–143.
21.
Jansson, M. B. ( 1985). “A comparison of detransformed logarithmic regressions and power function regressions.” Geografiska Annaler, 67, 61–70.
22.
Johansson, K., Andersson, A., and Andersson, T. ( 1995). “Regional accumulation pattern of heavy metals in lake sediments and forest soils in Sweden.” Ecological effects of Arctic airborne contaminants, D. H. Landers and S. J. Christie, eds., 373–380.
23.
Kmenta, J. ( 1986). Elements of econometrics, Macmillan, New York.
24.
Koch, R. W., and Smillie, G. M. ( 1986). “Bias in hydrologic prediction using log-transformed regression models.” Water Resour. Bull., 22(6), 717–723.
25.
Livesey, R. H. ( 1975). “ARS-S-40: Corps of Engineers methods for predicting sediment yields.” Present and prospective technology for predicting sediment yields and sources, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 16–32.
26.
Lopes, V. L., and Ffolliott, P. F. ( 1992). “Modeling sediment processes on small watersheds: A conceptual framework. I. Broad shallow flow processes.” Int. J. Sediment Res., 7, 21–44.
27.
Lopes, V. L., and Ffolliott, P. F. ( 1993a). “Modeling sediment processes on small watersheds: A conceptual framework. II. Concentrated flow processes.” Int. J. Sediment Res., 8, 1–23.
28.
Lopes, V. L., and Ffolliott, P. F. ( 1993b). “Sediment rating curves for a clearcut ponderosa pine watershed in northern Arizona.” Water Resour. Bull., 29, 369–382.
29.
Osterkamp, W. R., and Parker, R. S. ( 1991). “Sediment monitoring in the United States.” Proc., 5th Fed. Interagency Sedimentation Conf., 1–23.
30.
Piest, R. F. ( 1963). “Longterm sediment yields from small watersheds.” IAHS Publ. No. 65, International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Wallingford, U.K.
31.
Shen, H. W., and Li, R. M. ( 1976). “Water sediment yield.” Stochastic approaches to water response, H. W. Shen, ed., Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colo., 21–68.
32.
Sidle, R. C., and Campbell, A. J. ( 1985). “Patterns of suspended sediment transport in a coastal Alaska stream.” Water Resour. Bull., 21, 909–917.
33.
Skau, C. M. ( 1960). “Some hydrologic characteristics in the Utah juniper type of northern Arizona.” PhD dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Mich.
34.
Skau, C. M. ( 1961). “Some hydrologic influences of cabling juniper.” Res. Note 62, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
35.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. ( 1996). “The quality of our nation's water: 1996.” Executive Summary EPA 841-S-97-001, Washington, D.C.
36.
Walling, D. E. ( 1977). “Assessing the accuracy of suspended sediment rating curves for a small basin.” Water Resour. Res., 13, 531–538.
37.
Wetzel, R. G. ( 1983). Limnology, CBS College Publishing, New York.
38.
Williams, J. A., and Anderson, T. C. ( 1967). “Soil survey on Beaver Creek area, Arizona.” U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service and Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C. and Arizona Agricultural Experiment Station, Tucson, Ariz.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 127Issue 1February 2001
Pages: 41 - 47

History

Received: Apr 5, 1999
Published online: Feb 1, 2001
Published in print: Feb 2001

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assoc. Prof., School of Renewable Natural Resour., Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.
Prof., School of Renewable Natural Resour., Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Res. Hydro., Rocky Mountain Res. Station, U.S. Dept. of Agr. Forest Service, Flagstaff, AZ 86001.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share