TECHNICAL PAPERS
Sep 1, 1999

Evaluating Data Worth for Ground-Water Management under Uncertainty

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 125, Issue 5

Abstract

A decision framework is presented for assessing the value of ground-water sampling within the context of ground-water management under uncertainty. The framework couples two optimization models—a chance-constrained ground-water management model and an integer-programing sampling network design model—to identify optimal pumping and sampling strategies. The methodology consists of four steps: (1) The optimal ground-water management strategy for the present level of model uncertainty is determined using the chance-constrained management model; (2) for a specified data collection budget, the monitoring network design model identifies, prior to data collection, the sampling strategy that will minimize model uncertainty; (3) the optimal ground-water management strategy is recalculated on the basis of the projected model uncertainty after sampling; and (4) the worth of the monitoring strategy is assessed by comparing the value of the sample information—i.e., the projected reduction in management costs—with the cost of data collection. Steps 2–4 are repeated for a series of data collection budgets, producing a suite of management/monitoring alternatives, from which the best alternative can be selected. A hypothetical example demonstrates the methodology's ability to identify the ground-water sampling strategy with greatest net economic benefit for ground-water management.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Ahlfeld, D. P., and Heidari, M. (1994). “Applications of optimal hydraulic control to groundwater systems.”J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., ASCE, 120(3), 350–365.
2.
Andricevic, R. (1990). “A real-time approach to management and monitoring of groundwater hydraulics.” Water Resour. Res., 26(11), 2747–2758.
3.
Andricevic, R. (1993). “Coupled withdrawal and sampling designs for groundwater supply models.” Water Resour. Res., 29(1), 5–16.
4.
Andricevic, R., and Kitanidis, P. K. (1990). “Optimization of the pumping schedule in aquifer remediation under uncertainty.” Water Resour. Res., 26(5), 875–885.
5.
Carrera, J., and Neuman, S. P. (1986a). “Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady-state conditions: 1. Maximum likelihood method incorporating prior information.” Water Resour. Res., 22(2), 199–210.
6.
Carrera, J., and Neuman, S. P. (1986b). “Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady-state conditions: 3. Application to synthetic and field data.” Water Resour. Res., 22(2), 228–242.
7.
Cleveland, T. G., and Yeh, W. W.-G. (1990). “Sampling network design for transport parameter identification.”J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., ASCE, 116(6), 765–783.
8.
Cleveland, T. G., and Yeh, W. W.-G. (1991). “Optimal configuration and scheduling of groundwater tracer test.”J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., ASCE, 117(1), 37–51.
9.
Freeze, R. A., Massmann, J., Smith, L., Sperling, T., and James, B. (1990). “Hydrogeological decision analysis: 1. A framework.” Ground Water, 28(5), 738–766.
10.
Gailey, R. M., Crow, A. S., and Gorelick, S. M. (1992). “Coupled process parameter estimation and prediction uncertainty using hydraulic head and contaminant concentration data.” Adv. in Water Resour., 14(5), 301–314.
11.
Gailey, R. M., and Gorelick, S. M. (1993). “Design of optimal, reliable plume capture schemes: Application to the Gloucester landfill groundwater contamination problem.” Ground Water, 31(1), 107–114.
12.
Gorelick, S. M. (1983). “A review of distributed parameter groundwater management modeling methods.” Water Resour. Res., 19(5), 305–319.
13.
Gorelick, S. M. (1990). “Large scale nonlinear deterministic and stochastic optimization: Formulations involving simulation of subsurface contamination.” Mathematical Programming, 48, 19–39.
14.
James, B. R., and Gorelick, S. M. (1994). “When enough is enough: The worth of monitoring data in aquifer remediation design.” Water Resour. Res., 30(12), 3499–3513.
15.
Jones, L. (1992). “Adaptive control of groundwater hydraulics.”J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., ASCE, 118(1), 1–17.
16.
Knopman, D. S., Voss, C. I., and Garabedian, S. P. (1991). “Sampling design for groundwater solute transport: Tests of methods and analysis of cape cod tracer test data.” Water Resour. Res., 27(9), 925–949.
17.
Lee, S.-L., and Kitanidis, P. K. (1991). “Optimal estimation and scheduling in aquifer remediation with incomplete information.” Water Resour. Res., 27(9), 2203–2217.
18.
Loaiciga, H. A. (1989). “An optimization approach for groundwater quality monitoring network design.” Water Resour. Res., 25(8), 1771–1782.
19.
Massmann, J., and Freeze, R. A. (1987a). “Groundwater contamination from waste management sites: The interaction between risk-based engineering design and regulatory policy 1. Methodology.” Water Resour. Res., 23(2), 351–367.
20.
Massmann, J., and Freeze, R. A. (1987b). “Groundwater contamination from waste management sites: The interaction between risk-based engineering design and regulatory policy 2. Results.” Water Resour. Res., 23(2), 368–380.
21.
McKinney, D. C., and Loucks, D. P. (1992). “Network design for predicting groundwater contamination.” Water Resour. Res., 28(1), 133–147.
22.
Reichard, E. G., and Evans, J. S. (1989). “Assessing the value of hydrogeologic information for risk-based remedial action decisions.” Water Resour. Res., 25(7), 1451–1460.
23.
Tiedeman, C., and Gorelick, S. M. (1993). “Analysis of uncertainty in optimal groundwater contaminant capture design.” Water Resour. Res., 29(7), 2139–2153.
24.
Tucciarelli, T., and Pinder, G. (1991). “Optimal data acquisition strategy for the development of a transport model for groundwater remediation.” Water Resour. Res., 27(4), 577–588.
25.
Voss, C. I. (1984). “SUTRA: A finite element simulation model for saturated-unsaturated, fluid density-dependent groundwater flow with energy transport or chemical-reactive single-species solute transport.” U.S. Geological Survey Water Resour. Invest. Rep. 84-4369, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va.
26.
Wagner, B. J. (1992). “Simultaneous parameter estimation and contaminant source characterization for coupled groundwater flow and contaminant transport modeling.” J. of Hydro., Amsterdam, 135, 275–303.
27.
Wagner, B. J. (1995a). “Sampling design methods for groundwater modeling under uncertainty.” Water Resour. Res., 31(10), 2581–2591.
28.
Wagner, B. J. ( 1995b). “Recent advances in simulation-optimization groundwater management modeling.” Rev. of Geophysics, 33.
29.
Wagner, B. J., and Gorelick, S. M. (1987). “Optimal groundwater quality management under parameter uncertainty.” Water Resour. Res., 23(7), 1162–1174.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 125Issue 5September 1999
Pages: 281 - 288

History

Received: Oct 13, 1998
Published online: Sep 1, 1999
Published in print: Sep 1999

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Member, ASCE
Hydro., U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Rd., MS409, Menlo Park, CA 94025. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share