Optimal Ground-Water Pollution Plume Containment with Fixed Charges
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 123, Issue 1
Abstract
Six ground-water management models were developed and compared to identify the best management alternative for the containment of a ground-water pollution plume in a hypothetical aquifer that is used for freshwater supply. The proposed models are formulated as quadratic programming, linear programming, and mixed-integer programming models. Management models are grouped into two on the basis of treatment cost consideration. The optimal solutions of the models are compared and evaluated on the basis of total costs associated with the remediation system design. Sensitivity of the model solutions to variations in unit pumping and treatment costs are analyzed. The results of the models are quite different in regard to the number of potential interception wells completed, their pumping rates, resulting operation, and capital investment costs. Results show that considerable amounts of savings may be achieved through application of the mixed-integer programming models explicitly considering each of the cost components. Therefore, in remediation system designs that require installation of interception wells, ground-water managers should take into account the fixed charges incurred for each well that is introduced in the mathematical model.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Aguado, E., and Remson, I.(1980). “Groundwater management with fixed charges.”J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., ASCE, 106(2), 375–382.
2.
Ahlfeld, D. P., and Sawyer, C. S.(1990). “Well location in capture zone design using simulation and optimization techniques.”Ground Water, 28(4), 507–512.
3.
Aral, M. M.(1989). “Waste stabilization in multilayer aquifers by optimal hydraulic control.”Ground Water, 27(4), 517–523.
4.
Atwood, D. F., and Gorelick, M. S.(1985). “Hydraulic gradient control for groundwater contaminant removal.”J. Hydro., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 76, 85–106.
5.
Başağaoğlu, H., and Yazicigil, H.(1994). “Optimal capacity-expansion planning in multiaquifer systems.”J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., ASCE, 120(6), 836–856.
6.
Colarullo, S. J., Heidari, M., and Maddock, T. III.(1984). “Identification of an optimal groundwater management strategy in a contaminated aquifer.”Water Resour. Bull., 20(5), 747–760.
7.
Colarullo, S. J., Heidari, M., and Maddock, T. III. (1985). “Demonstrative model for identifying ground-water management options in a contaminated aquifer.”Rep., Ground-Water Ser. 8, Kansas Geological Survey, Lawrence, Kans.
8.
Danskin, W. R., and Gorelick, S. M.(1985). “A policy evaluation tool; management of a multiaquifer system using controlled stream recharge.”Water Resour. Res., 21(11), 1731–1747.
9.
Dougherty, D. E., and Marryott, R. A.(1991). “Optimal groundwater management, 1, simulated annealing.”Water Resour. Res., 27(10), 2493–2508.
10.
Galeati, G., and Gambolati, G.(1988). “Optimal dewatering schemes in the foundation design of an electronuclear plant.”Water Resour. Res., 24(4), 541–552.
11.
Heidari, M., Sadeghipour, J., and Drici, O.(1987). “Velocity control as a tool for optimal plume containment in the Equus Beds Aquifer, Kansas.”Water Resour. Bull., 23(2), 325–335.
12.
Lefkoff, J. L., and Gorelick, S. M.(1986). “Design and cost analysis of rapid aquifer restoration systems using flow simulation and quadratic programming.”Ground Water, 24(6), 777–790.
13.
Maddock, T. III.(1972). “Algebraic technological function from a simulation model.”Water Resour. Res., 8(1), 129–134.
14.
Mathematical programming system extended/370 (MPSX/370) version 2; program reference manual. (1988). International Business Machines (IBM) Corp., Rome, Italy.
15.
McDonald, M. G., and Harbaugh, A. W. (1984). A modular three-dimensional finite-difference groundwater flow model. Scientific Publications Co., Washington, D.C.
16.
McKinney, D. C., and Lin, M. D.(1994). “Genetic algorithm solution of groundwater-management models.”Water Resour. Res., 30(6), 1897–1906.
17.
McKinney, D. C., and Lin, M. D.(1995). “Approximate mixed-integer nonlinear programming methods for optimal aquifer remediation design.”Water Resour. Res., 31(3), 731–740.
18.
Misirli, F. (1994). “Optimal waste containment strategies in groundwater pollution studies,” MS thesis, Middle East Tech. Univ., Ankara, Turkey.
19.
Molz, F., and Bell, L. C.(1977). “Head gradient control in aquifers used for fluid storage.”Water Resour. Res., 13(4), 795–798.
20.
Murtagh, B. A., and Saunders, M. A. (1983). “MINOS 5.0 user's guide.”Sys. Optimization Lab. Tech. Rep. SOL 83-20, Dept. of Operations Res., Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
21.
Nelson, A. G., and Busch, C. D. (1967). “Costs of pumping water in central Arizona.”Tech. Bull. 182, Arizona Agric. Experiment Station, Tucson, Ariz., 1–44.
22.
Ratzlaff, A. S., Aral, M. M., and Al-Khayyal, F.(1992). “Optimal design of groundwater capture systems using segmental velocity-direction constraints.”Ground Water, 30(4), 607–612.
23.
Ritzel, J. R., Eheart, W., and Ranjithan, S.(1994). “Using genetic algorithms to solve a multiple objective groundwater pollution containment problem.”Water Resour. Res., 30(5), 1589–1603.
24.
Sawyer, S. S., Ahlfeld, D. P., and King, A. J.(1995). “Groundwater remediation design using a three-dimensional simulation model and mixed-integer programming.”Water Resour. Res., 31(5), 1373–1385.
25.
Wang, W., and Ahlfeld, D. P.(1994). “Optimal groundwater remediation with well location as a decision variable: model development.”Water Resour. Res., 30(5), 1605–1618.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1997
Published in print: Jan 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.