Levels of Service Applied to Urban Streams
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 117, Issue 4
Abstract
The idea of levels of service for resource allocation is explored in managing troublesome urban collector streams in Charlotte, N.C. Results suggest that a classification system based on levels of service would be of significant use to public officials in analyzing problems of remediation. Assigning levels of service provides a basis for quantitative communication between laypersons and technical staff. The level‐of‐service concept is adapted from those in use in transportation applications. Five levels of service are suggested to describe the functional quality of urban streams. The proposed level of service measures represent a reasonable approach to assessing the performance quality of an urban stream. A major benefit of using the measures is the opportunity to view the stream system as a whole instead of as a series of citizen complaints. The downstream effects of various alternatives can be more easily assessed when the downstream conditions are already known. The prioritization of projects based on level‐of‐service measures would allow public funds to be spent more equitably.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Becker, B. C., Clar, M. L., and Kautzman, R. B. (1973). Approaches to stormwater management. Hittman Associates, Inc., Columbia, Md.
2.
“City of Charlotte Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance.” (1975). Ordinance No. 529, City of Charlotte, N.C.
3.
Goettemoeller, R. L. (1980). “Erosion control and stormwater management for urban soil sediment pollution control: A workable Ohio standard.” Proc., Nat. Conf. on Urban Erosion and Sediment Control: Institutions and Tech., W. L. Downing, ed., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
4.
Hammer, T. R. (1973). “Effects of urbanization on steam channels and stream flow.” Regional Science Research Institute, Philadelphia, Pa.
5.
Highway capacity manual. (1965). “Special Report 87,” Highway Research Board, Washington, D.C.
6.
Highway capacity manual. (1985). “Special Report 209,” Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
7.
Hirsch, R. M. (1977). “The interaction of channel size and flood discharges for basins undergoing urbanization.” Publication No. 123, International Association of Scientific Hydrology, Seattle, Wash.
8.
Hollis, G. E. (1975). “The effect of urbanization on floods of different recurrence intervals.” Water Resour. Res., 11(3), 431–435.
9.
Johnson, C. (1983). “Pavement (maintenance) management systems,” APWA Reporter, 50(11).
10.
Kulkarni, R. B., Golabi, K., Finn, F. N., Johnson, R. (1980). “A systematic procedure for the development of maintenance levels of service.” Transp. Res. Record 781, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
11.
Lancaster, C. C. (1985). “Application of the level of service concept to urban streams,” thesis presented to North Carolina State University, at Raleigh, N.C, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
12.
Malcom, H. R., Avera, M. E., Bullard, C. M., and Lancaster, C. C. (1986). “Stormwater management in urban collector streams.” Report No. 226, Water Resources Research Institute of the Univ. of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C.
13.
Martens, L. A. (1964). “Flood inundation and effects of urbanization in metropolitan Charlotte, North Carolina.” Water‐Supply Paper 1591‐C, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
14.
Nunnally, N. R., and Keller, E. (1979). “Use of fluvial processes to minimize adverse effects of stream channelization.” Report No. 144, Water Resources Research Institute of the Univ. of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C.
15.
Poertner, H. G. (1980). “Stormwater management in the United States: A study of institutional problems, solutions and impacts.” Office of Water Research and Technology, U.S. Department of Interior, Bolingbrook, Ill.
16.
Schumm, S. A. (1975). “Geomorphic thresholds and complex response of drainage systems.” Fluvial Geomorphology Symp., M. Morisawa, ed., Publications in Geomorphology, Binghamton, N.Y.
17.
Shahin, M. Y. (1980). “Components of a pavement maintenance management system.” Transp. Res. Record 781, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
18.
Urban hydrology for small watersheds. (1975). Engineering Division, Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
19.
Soule, D. M., and Vaughan, C. M. (1973). “Flood protection benefits as reflected in property value changes.” Water Resour. Bulletin, 9(5), 918–922.
20.
Whipple, W., Grigg, N. S., Grizzard, T., Randall, C. W., Shubinski, R. P., and Tucker, L. S. (1983). Stormwater management in urbanizing areas. 1st Ed., Prentice‐Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 117 • Issue 4 • July 1991
Pages: 482 - 497
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1991
Published in print: Jul 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.