Groundwater Contamination Benefit‐Cost Analysis Methodology
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 114, Issue 2
Abstract
A procedure for estimating benefits associated with the cleanup of groundwater contamination is proposed. The first step in this procedure is development of a joint probability distribution of contaminant concentration and duration of exposure at a specified location X. A computer model using the turning bands method to generate spatiallyvarying, but correlated hydraulic conductivity fields and a groundwater flow/mass transport computer program to move the contaminant downstream is used to construct the probability distribution. The second step is involved with the formation of a joint incidence fraction distribution of test organism response to various contaminant concentration and duration of exposure levels at the specific location. The sum of the products of the joint probability and incidence fraction distribution values for various contaminant concentration and duration of exposure levels are multiplied by the number of organisms exposed at the specified location in order to estimate benefits resulting from a groundwater cleanup effort.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Anderson, M. P. (1984). “Movement of contaminants in groundwater: groundwater transport‐advection and dispersion.” Studies in Geophysics: Groundwater Contamination, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 37–45.
2.
Brown, V. M. (1973). “Concepts and outlook in testing the toxicity of substances to fish.” Bioassay Techniques and Environmental Chemistry, G. E. Glass, ed., Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan, 73–95.
3.
Hutt, P. B. (1984). “Legal considerations in risk assessment under federal regulatory statutes.” Assessment and Management of Chemical Risks, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., 83–85.
4.
Kadi, A. I., and Brutsaert, W. (1985). “Applicability of effective parameters for unsteady flow in nonuniform aquifers.” Water Resour. Res., 21(2), 183–198.
5.
Kaunas, J. R., and Haimes, Y. Y. (1985). “Risk management of groundwater contamination in a multiobjective framework.” Water Resour. Res., 21(11), 1721–1730.
6.
Lewis, B. D., and Goldstein, F. J. (1982). “Evaluation of a predictive groundwater solute‐transport model at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Idaho.” Report No. USGSIWRI‐82‐25, Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Id., Mar.
7.
Mantoglou, A., and Wilson, J. L. (1981). “Simulation of random fields with the turning bands methods.” Report 264, Ralph M. Parsons Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., Jul.
8.
Mantoglou, A., and Wilson, J. L. (1982). “The turning bands method for simulation of random fields using line generation by a spectral method.” Water Resour. Res., 18(5), 1379–1394.
9.
Massmann, J., and Freeze, R. A. (1987a). “Groundwater contamination from waste management sites: the interaction between risk‐based engineering design and regulatory policy: 1, methodology.” Water Resour. Res., 23(2), 351–367.
10.
Massmann, J., and Freeze, R. A. (1987b). “Groundwater contamination from waste management sites: the interaction between risk‐based engineering design and regulatory policy: 2, results.” Water Resour. Res., 23(2), 368–380.
11.
McMillan, W. D. (1966). “Theoretical analysis of groundwater basin operations.” Water Resources Center Contribution No. 114, University of California, Berkeley, Calif.
12.
Nelson, N. (1984). “Use of toxicity test data in the estimation of risks to human health.” Assessment and Management of Chemical Risks, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., 13–22.
13.
Prickett, T. A., Naymik, T. G., and Longquist, C. G. (1981). “A ‘random walk’ solute transport model for selected groundwater quality evaluations.” Bulletin 65, Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, Ill.
14.
Protecting the Nation's Groundwater from Contamination. (1984). Vol. 2, Office of Technology Assessment, Congress of the United States, Washington, D.C., 243–247.
15.
“Revised ICPP effluent data 1976 through 1983.” (1984). WINCO‐1004, Westinghouse Idaho Nuclear Co., Inc., Mar.
16.
Robertson, J. B. (1974). “Digital modeling of radioactive and chemical waste transport in the Snake River Plain Aquifer at the National Reactor Testing Station, Idaho.” USGS Open‐File Report IDO‐22054, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C., May.
17.
Smith, L., and Freeze, R. A. (1979a). “Stochastic analysis of steady state groundwater flow in a bounded domain, 1, one‐dimensional simulations.” Water Resour. Res., 15(3), 521–528.
18.
Smith, L., and Freeze, R. A. (1979b). “Stochastic analysis of steady state groundwater flow in a bounded domain, 2, one‐dimensional simulations.” Water Resour. Res., 15(6), 1543–1559.
19.
Smith, L., and Schwarz, F. W. (1980). “Mass transport, 1, a stochastic analysis of macroscopic dispersion.” Water Resour. Res., 16(2), 303–313.
20.
Smith, L., and Schwarz, F. W. (1981a). “Mass transport, 2, analysis of uncertainty in prediction.” Water Resour. Res., 17(2), 351–369.
21.
Smith, L., and Schwarz, F. W. (1981b). “Mass transport, 3, role of hydraulic conductivity data in prediction.” Water Resour. Res., 17(5), 1463–1479.
22.
Warren, J. E., and Price, H. S. (1961). “Flow in heterogeneous porous media.” Soc. of Petroleum Engrs. Journal, 1, 153–169.
23.
Wolka, K. K. (1986). “A stochastic analysis of pollutant movement in groundwater,” dissertation presented to Iowa State University, Ames, Ia., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 ASCE.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1988
Published in print: Mar 1988
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.