TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jul 1, 1987

Optimal Daily Operation of Surface‐Water Systems

Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 113, Issue 4

Abstract

The managers of large‐scale, surface‐water reservoir and delivery systems are required on a daily basis to make complex operating decisions. To assist in that decision process, a computational methodology is presented for determining the optimal operation of a general surface‐water resources system of water storage and conveyance facilities. The system is assumed to be operated for hydroelectric power generation, water supply, flood control, and low flow augmentation. The daily operation of such a system is represented as a deterministic, nonlinear optimization problem, with the decision variables being the average daily reservoir releases, water diversions, and pipeline and canal flows. Successive linear programming (SLP) is used to iteratively change the daily reservoir releases to improve system performance. The SLP algorithm converges to an operational policy satisfying the necessary conditions for optimality. The algorithm, incorporated into the MONITOR‐I computer program, is applied to the Lower Rio Grande System in Texas, and the results reviewed.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Adiguzel, R. I., and Coskunoglu, O. (1982). “Decentralized computation and implementation of mathematical programs for large and complex systems with specific reference to reservoir systems.” Univ. of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign, Urbana‐Champaign, Ill., presented at the TIMS/ORSA Joint Nat. Meeting, Detroit, Mich.
2.
Bechard, D., et al. (1981). “The Ottawa River regulation modeling system (ORRMS).” Proceedings of Internat. Symposium on Real‐Time Operation of Hydrosystems, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 1, 179–198.
3.
Can, E. K., Houck, M. H., and Toebes, G. H. (1982). “Optimal real‐time reservoir systems operation: innovative objectives and implementation problems.” Tech. Report 150, Purdue Univ. Water Resour. Res. Center., Purdue Univ., W. Lafayette, Ind.
4.
Chow, V. T. (1959). Open‐Channel Hydraulics, McGraw‐Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, N.Y., 606–607.
5.
Coomes, R. T. (1979). “Regulation of Arkansas Basin reservoirs.” Proceedings Nat. Workshop on Reservoir Systems Operations, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, Colo., 254–265.
6.
Dagli, C. H., and Miles, J. F. (1980). “Determining operating policies for water resource systems.” J. Hydrology, 47(3/4), 297–306.
7.
Dantzig, G. B. (1963). Linear Programming and Extensions, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J.
8.
Dantzig, G. B., and Wolfe, P. (1960). “The decomposition algorithm for linear programming.” Operations Research, 8(1,2,10).
9.
Divi, R., et al. (1980). “A short‐term optimization model for operation of a large multi‐reservoir hydroelectric system.” Alcan Smelters and Chemical Ltd., Arvida, Quebec, Canada, presented to Joint Nat. TIMS/ORSA Meeting, Washington, D.C.
10.
Eichert, B. S., Peters, J. C., and Pabst, A. F. (1975). “Techniques for real‐time operation of flood control reservoirs in the Merrimac River Basin.” Hydro. Engrg. Center Tech. Paper No. 45, U.S. Army Corps Engrs.
11.
Helweg, O. J., Hinks, R. W., and Ford, D. T. (1982). “Reservoir systems optimization.” J. Water Resour. Planning and Mgmt. Div., ASCE, 108(2), 169–179.
12.
Himmelblau, D. H. (1972). Applied Nonlinear Programming, McGraw‐Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, N.Y.
13.
Houck, M. H. (1982). “Real‐time daily reservoir operation by mathematical programming.” Water Resour. Res., 18(5), 1345–1351.
14.
Ikura, Y., and Gross, G. (1984). “Efficient large‐scale hydro system scheduling with forced spill conditions.” IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS‐103(12), 3502–3520.
15.
Jensen, P. A., and Shannugham, C. C. (1977). “Development and documentation of mathematical models for the Paraiba River Basin study, volume III‐CAPEX. A method for determining the selection and scheduling of waste treatment plants in a river basin.” Report 146, Center for Res. in Water Resour., Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex.
16.
Lasdon, L. S. (1970). Optimization Theory for Large Systems, MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York, N.Y.
17.
Martin, Q. W. (1983). “Optimal operation of multiple reservoir systems.” J. Water Resour. Planning and Mgmt., ASCE, 109(1), 58–74.
18.
Martin, Q. W. (1986). “Surface‐water resources optimal daily operation model‐MONITOR‐I, program documentation and users manual.” Report UM‐49, Texas Water Development Board, Austin, Tex.
19.
McMahon, G. F., Fitzgerald, R., and McCarthy, B. (1984). “BRASS model: practical aspects.” J. Water Resour. Planning and Mgmt. Div., ASCE, 110(1), 75–89.
20.
Palacios‐Gomez, F., Lasdon, L., and Engquist, M. (1982). “Nonlinear optimization by successive linear programming.” Mgmt. Sci., 28(10), 1106–1120.
21.
Pereira, M. V. F., and Pinto, L. M. V. G. (1984). “Application of decomposition methods to the generation scheduling of hydrothermal systems.” presented to TIMS/ORSA Nat. Meeting, San Francisco, Calif.
22.
Sabet, M. H., et al. (1985). “Optimal operation of California aqueduct.” J. Water Resour. Planning and Mgmt. Div., ASCE, 111(2), 222–237.
23.
Shelton, R. A. (1979). “Management of TVA reservoir systems.” Proceedings, Nat. Workshop on Reservoir Systems Operations, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, Colo., 318–335.
24.
Sigvaldason, O. T. (1976). “A simulation model for operating a multipurpose multireservoir system.” Water Resour. Res., 12(2), 263–278.
25.
Texas Water Development Board (1974). “Economic optimization and simulation techniques for management of regional water resources systems.” Report 179, Austin, Tex.
26.
Hydrologic Engrg. Center (1979). “HEC‐5 reservoir system operation for flood control and conservation user manual,” U.S. Army Corps of Engrs., Davis, Calif.
27.
Turgeon, A. (1981). “Optimal short‐term hydro scheduling from the principal of progressive optimality.” Water Resour. Res., 17(3), 481–486.
28.
Wasimi, S. A., and Kitamides, P. K. (1983). “Real‐time forecasting and daily operation of a multireservoir system, during floods by linear quadratic Gaussian control.” Water Resour. Res., 19(6), 1511–1522.
29.
Windsor, J. S. (1973). “Optimization model for the operation of flood control systems.” Water Resour. Res., 9(5), 1219–1226.
30.
Yazicigil, H., Houck, M. H., and Toebes, G. H. (1983). “Daily operation of a multipurpose reservoir system.” Water Resour. Res., 19(1), 1–13.
31.
Yeh, W. W‐G., et al. (1976). “Optimization of real‐time daily operation of a multiple reservoir system,” Engrg. Report No. UCLA‐ENG‐76‐18, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Calif.
32.
Yeh, W. W‐G., Becker, L., and Chu, W. S. (1978). “Optimization of real‐time hourly operations of a complex, multiple purpose reservoir system.” Engrg. Report No. UCLA‐ENG‐78‐07, Univ. of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif.
33.
Yeh, W. W‐G. (1982). “State of the art review: Theories and applications of systems analysis techniques to the optimal management and operation of a reservoir system.” Report No. UCLA‐ENC‐82‐52, Univ. of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 113Issue 4July 1987
Pages: 453 - 470

History

Published online: Jul 1, 1987
Published in print: Jul 1987

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Quentin W. Martin
Mgr., Water Policy and Programs Div., Lower Colorado River Authority, Austin, TX 78767

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share