Water Resources Engineering Education
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 111, Issue 3
Abstract
Water resources engineering education may hinder the development of practitioners who must be not only technically proficient, but also capable of managing engineering problems in a social, political, and economic context. Professional water resources engineering requires the ability to communicate in interdisciplinary efforts, to plan public information programs, and to factor legal and social input, as well as technical know‐how, into problem solving. Opportunities to improve water resources engineering education include: (1) New methods of evaluating students that include assessments of communications skills; (2) broadened course requirements linking technical and social science/humanities programs through joint appointments, faculty exchanges, or social science/humanities courses tailor‐made for the engineering student; (3) a shift from traditional graduate training to providing an opportunity for graduate research on open‐ended problems typically found in water resources engineering; (4) nonoptional co‐op experience in the real world; and (5) evaluation outside of the accreditation process to encourage program experimentation. Professional practitioners can only benefit by such educational improvements and should provide substantial external support for basic research evaluating engineering education curricula, as well as support for and involvement in curriculum development.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Berg, N. A., “The Soil and Water Conservationist of Tomorrow,” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 23, No. 6, Nov.–Dec. 1968, pp. 203–205.
2.
Brancher, D., “The Organization of Process: Some Notions and Models,” The Environment in Engineering Education, UNESCO Studies in Engineering Education, No. 9, 1980, pp. 97–111.
3.
Center for Policy Alternatives, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Future Directions for Engineering Education, 1975.
4.
Center for Urban and Regional Planning, Auburn University, Comprehensive Planning for Water and Related Land Resources in Alabama, 1972.
5.
Droege, R., “The Resource Manager of Tomorrow,” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 23, No. 6, Nov.–Dec. 1968, pp. 209–212.
6.
Evans, D. D., and Harshbarger, J. W., “Curriculum Development in Hydrology,” The Progress of Hydrology, Vol. III: Hydrologic Education and Discussions, Proceedings of the First International Seminar for Hydrology Professors, University of Illinois, Urbana, Ill., 1969, pp. 1024–1043.
7.
Ewing, B. B., Chow, V. T., and Flack, J. E., “Guidelines for a Graduate Curriculum in Water Resources Engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 59, June, 1969, pp. 1140–1142.
8.
Flood‐Page, C., “Teaching and Research—Happy Symbiosis or Hidden Warfare,” Universities Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 1, Winter, 1972, pp. 102–118.
9.
Gafni, G., and Waks, S., “Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness: Research versus Student Rating,” Engineering Education, Vol. 68, No. 8, May 1978, pp. 839–842.
10.
Goodman, A. S., “Education and Training in Water Resources Planning,” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management Division, ASCE, Vol. 102, No. WR2, 1976, pp. 209–218.
11.
Schultz, A. H., and Westmore, R. A., “Water Resources Education Requirements of Engineering Firm,” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE, Vol. 105, No. WR2, 1979, pp. 377–384.
12.
Voeks, V. W., “Publications and Teaching Effectiveness,” Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 33, No. 4, 1962, pp. 212–218.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1985
Published in print: Jul 1985
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.