Exporting Colorado Water in Coal Slurry Pipelines
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 111, Issue 2
Abstract
The San Marco Pipeline Company has proposed a 1,000‐mile (1,610‐km) pipeline system to move coal slurry from southeastern Colorado to several electrical generating plants in the Texas Gulf Coast area. This area of Colorado is experiencing severe water shortage problems due to the large amount of water used for irrigation. Colorado statutes restrict the diversion of both surface and ground water for out‐of‐state use unless such water is credited to interstate compacts. Water has been found by the courts to be a commodity or article of commerce, therefore subject to federal constitutional scrutiny under the commerce clause. The constitutionality of Colorado's statutes depends upon the nature of the restrictions imposed, the severity of the burden created, and the local purposes served by the statutes. Statutes will be upheld only where they incidentally burden or discriminate against interstate commerce. States may impose severe restrictions on diverting water for out‐of‐state uses provided the same type of restrictions are imposed on in‐state use.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Arizona vs. California, 373 U.S. 546, 83 Sup. Ct. 1468 (1963).
2.
Brighton Ditch Co. vs. City of Englewood, 124 Colo. 366, 237 Pacific 2d 116 (1951).
3.
California vs. United States, 438 U.S. 645, 98 Sup. Ct. 2985 (1978).
4.
California Oregon Power Co. vs. Beaver Portland Cement Co., 295 U.S. 142, 55 S. Ct. 725 (1935).
5.
City of Altus vs. Carr, 255 Fed. Supp. 823 (Western District Texas, 1966), affirmed, 385 U.S. 35, 87 Sup. Ct. 240 (1966).
6.
Clyde, S. E., “State Prohibitions on Interstate Exportation of Scarce Water Resources,” University of Colorado Law Review, Vol. 53, No. 3, 1982, pp. 529–558.
7.
Colorado Constitution, Article 16, Secs. 5, 6.
8.
Colorado Revised Statutes, Sec. 37‐66‐101 et seq. (1973).
9.
Colorado Revised Statutes, Sec. 37‐81‐101 (Supplement 1981).
10.
Colorado Revised Statutes, Sec. 37‐81‐103(1) (Supplement 1981).
11.
Colorado Revised Statutes, Secs. 37‐83‐101, ‐105 (1973).
12.
Colorado Revised Statutes, Secs. 37‐90‐102, ‐103(6), (7), ‐104, ‐106, ‐107 to ‐109 (1973 & Supplement 1981).
13.
Colorado Revised Statutes, Sec. 37‐90‐136 (1973).
14.
Colorado Revised Statutes, Sec. 37‐90‐137 (1973 & Supplement 1981).
15.
Colorado Revised Statutes, Secs. 37‐90‐137(1), (2) (1973 & Supplement 1981).
16.
Colorado Revised Statutes, Sec. 37‐90‐137(4) (1973).
17.
Colorado Revised Statutes, Sec. 37‐92‐101 et seq. (1973 & Supplement 1981).
18.
Colorado Revised Statutes, Secs. 37‐92‐103(11), ‐301, ‐302 (1973 & Supplement 1981).
19.
Colorado Revised Statutes, Secs. 37‐92‐201, ‐202 (1973).
20.
Colorado Revised Statutes, Secs. 37‐92‐203, ‐302, ‐304 (1973 & Supplement 1981).
21.
Colorado Session Laws, Chap. 289 (1957).
22.
Corker, C. E., “Can a State Embargo the Export of Water by Transbasin Diversions?,” Idaho Law Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1976, pp. 135–152.
23.
DeHaas vs. Benesch, 116 Colo. 344, 188 Pacific 2d 453 (1947).
24.
Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. vs. Andrus, 596 Federal Reporter 2d 348 (9th Circuit, 1979).
25.
First Iowa Hydro‐Electric Cooperative vs. Federal Power Commission, 152 U.S. 152, 66 Sup. Ct. 906 (1946).
26.
Green vs. Chaffee Ditch Co., 150 Colo. 91, 371 Pacific 2d 775 (1962).
27.
Hudson County Water Co. vs. McCarter, 209 U.S. 349, 28 Sup. Ct. 529 (1908).
28.
Hugues vs. Oklahoma, 441 U.S. 322, 99 Sup. Ct. 1727 (1979).
29.
In re Application for Water Rights of San Marco Pipeline Co., Colo. District Court, Water Division No. 3, Case No. W‐3665, filed Dec. 30, 1976.
30.
Kelly, W. R., “Colorado Ground Water Act of 1957—Is Ground Water Property of the Public?,” Rocky Mountain Law Review, Vol. 31, No. 2, University of Colorado School of Law, 1959, pp. 165–171.
31.
Martz, C. O., and Grazis, S. L., “Interstate Transfers of Water and Water Rights—The Slurry Issue,” Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute, Vol. 23, Matthew Bender and Co., New York, N.Y., 1977, pp. 33–70.
32.
Massey, Dean T., “Interstate Transfer of Colorado Water for the San Marco Coal Slurry Pipeline,” Oklahoma Law Review, Vol. 36, No. 1, 1983, pp. 1–64.
33.
Mooney vs. Kuiper, 194 Colo. 477, 573 Pacific 2d 538 (1978).
34.
Nebraska Revised Statutes, Sec. 46–613.01 (1978).
35.
Nebraska Revised Statutes, Sec. 46‐656 et seq. (1978 & Supplement 1982).
36.
Philadelphia vs. New Jersey, 437 U.S. 617, 98 Sup. Ct. 2531 (1978).
37.
Sporhase vs. Nebraska, 458 U.S. 941, 102 Sup. Ct. 3456 (1982).
38.
Stockman vs. Leddy, 55 Colo. 24, 129 Pacific 220 (1912).
39.
Tarlock, A. D., “Western Water Law and Coal Development,” University of Colorado Law Review, Vol. 51, No. 4, 1980, pp. 511–550.
40.
Teknekron, Incorporated, Distributing the Risks of Interbasin Water Transfers Under Drought Conditions: The Dilemma Posed by Coal Slurry Pipelines, Berkeley, Calif., 1982.
41.
Texas Natural Resources Code, Secs. 111.019(a), 302(a) (1978).
42.
U.S. Code, Title 16, Sec. 791a et seq. (1982).
43.
U.S. Code, Title 43, Secs. 321 to 329 (1976).
44.
U.S. Code, Title 43, Sec. 372 et seq. (1976).
45.
U.S. Code, Title 43, Sec. 485h(c) (1976).
46.
U.S. Code, Title 43, Secs. 617 to 617t (1976).
47.
U.S. Code, Title 43, Sec. 661 (1976).
48.
U.S. Constitution, Amendment X.
49.
U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 3.
50.
Whitten vs. Coit, 153 Colo. 157, 385 Pacific 2d 131 (1963).
51.
Winters vs. United States, 207 U.S. 564, 28 Sup. Ct. 207 (1908).
52.
Colorado Revised Statutes, Sec. 37‐81‐101 (Supplement 1981), Colorado Session Laws, 1983, p. 1410, Sec. 1.
53.
Colorado Revised Statutes, Sec. 37‐81‐101 (Supplement 1984).
54.
Colorado Revised Statutes, Sec. 37‐81‐103 (Supplement 1981), Colorado Session Laws, 1983, p. 1412, Sec. 3.
55.
Colorado Revised Statutes, Sec. 37‐81‐103 (Supplement 1984).
56.
Colorado Revised Statutes, Sec. 37‐90‐136 (1973);
Colorado Session Laws, 1983, p. 1413, Sec. 5.
57.
Colorado Session Laws, 1983, pp. 1410–1413, Secs. 1 to 5.
58.
Nebraska Revised Statutes, Sec. 46–613.01 (1978).
59.
Sporhase vs. Nebraska, 458 U.S. 941, 102 Sup. Ct. 3456 (1982).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 111 • Issue 2 • April 1985
Pages: 207 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 ASCE.
History
Published online: Apr 1, 1985
Published in print: Apr 1985
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.