Satisfying Instream Flow Needs Under Western Water Rights
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 111, Issue 2
Abstract
The appropriation system of water rights has been criticized for failure to provide adequate protection of instream flow values. The appropriation system is measured against 13 fundamental principles of good state water law. Within the context of this comparison, the implications with respect to accommodating instream flow uses are examined. It is concluded that the appropriation system can equitably incorporate instream flow uses, but is constrained by lack of “litigation proof” methodologies and technologies to project impacts and tradeoffs. The integration of instream flow rights is also retarded by lack of proper recognition of certain hydrologic imperatives that must be observed in order to correctly define the instream flow right. Instream flow rights must not upset the integrity of other rights within the common system.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bagley, J. M., Larson, D. T., and Kapaloski, L., “Adapting Appropriation Water Law to Accommodate Equitable Consideration of Instream Flow Uses,” UWRL/P‐83/06, Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, June, 1983.
2.
Dewsnup, R., and Jensen, D., “State Laws and Instream Flows,” FWS/OBS‐77/27, Western Energy and Land Use Team, Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Interior, Ft. Collins, Colo., Mar., 1977.
3.
Dewsnup, R., et al., “Promising Strategies for Reserving Instream Flows,” FWS/OBS‐77/29, Western Energy and Land Use Team, Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Interior, Ft. Collins, Colo., Aug., 1977.
4.
Hutchins, W. A., “Water Rights Laws in the Nineteen Western States,” Miscellaneous Publication No. 1206, Natural Resource Economics Division, ERS, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., 1971.
5.
Jawetz, S. M., “The Public Trust Totem in Public Land Law: Ineffective—and Undesirable—Judicial Intervention,” Ecology Law Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1982.
6.
Nelson, W., Horak, G., and Solomon, J., “Instream Flow Strategies for Arizona, FWS/OBS‐78/35, Western Energy and Land Use Team, Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Interior, Ft. Collins, Colo., May, 1978.
7.
Nelson, W., Horak, G., and Lewis, M., “Instream Flow Strategies for Colorado,” FWS/OBS‐78/37, Western Energy and Land Use Team, Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Interior, Ft. Collins, Colo., May, 1978.
8.
Nelson, W., Horak, G., and Solomon, J., “Instream Flow Strategies for Idaho,” FWS/OBS‐78/38, Western Energy and Land Use Team, Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Interior, Ft. Collins, Colo., May, 1978.
9.
Nelson, W., Horak, G., and Solomon, J., “Instream Flow Strategies for Montana,” FWS/OBS‐78/39, Western Energy and Land Use Team, Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Interior, Ft. Collins, Colo., May, 1978.
10.
Nelson, W., Horak, G., and Solomon, J., “Instream Flow Strategies for Nevada, FWS/OBS‐78/40, Western Energy and Land Use Team, Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Interior, Ft. Collins, Colo., May, 1978.
11.
Nelson, W., Horak, G., and Solomon, J., “Instream Flow Strategies for New Mexico, FWS/OBS‐78/41, Western Energy and Land Use Team, Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Interior, Ft. Collins, Colo., May, 1978.
12.
Nelson, W., Horak, G., and Solomon, J., “Instream Flow Strategies for Utah, FWS/OBS‐78/45, Western Energy and Land Use Team, Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Interior, Ft. Collins, Colo., May, 1978.
13.
Nelson, W., Horak, G., and Solomon, J., “Instream Flow Strategies for Wyoming,” FWS/OBS‐78/47, Western Energy and Land Use Team, Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Interior, Ft. Collins, Colo., May, 1978.
14.
Sax, J. L., “The Public Trust Doctrine in Natural Resource Law: Effective Judicial Intervention,” Michigan Law Review, Vol. 68, No. 471, 1970.
15.
Smith, F. E., “The Public Trust Doctrine, Instream Flows and Resources,” U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California‐Nevada Area Office, Sacramento, Calif., 1980.
16.
Tarlock, A. D., “Appropriation for Instream Flow Maintenance: A Progress Report on the “New” Public Western Water Rights,” Utah Law Review, 1978, pp. 211–247.
17.
Trelease, F. J., “New Water Legislation: Drafting for Development, Efficient Allocation and Environmental Protection,” Land and Water Law Review, Vol. XII, No. 2, 1977.
18.
In the Matter of the Permit Application No. 37‐7108 in the Name of the State of Idaho Department of Parks (Malad Canyon Springs): State of Idaho Department of Parks, Idaho Water Users Association et al. versus Idaho Department of Water Administration, Supreme Court, Idaho, 530 P2d 924, 1974.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 111 • Issue 2 • April 1985
Pages: 171 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 ASCE.
History
Published online: Apr 1, 1985
Published in print: Apr 1985
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.