Limitations on Seasonal Snowmelt Forecast Accuracy
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 110, Issue 3
Abstract
Forecasting of seasonal snowmelt runoff is an important exception to the otherwise limited accuracy of long‐term runoff forecasts. Conceptual models of the snow accumulation and ablation and precipitation‐runoff processes have been advocated as a means of introducing physical understanding of the dominant hydrologic processes into seasonal snowmelt runoff processes. However, the paucity of information and extreme spatial variability of meteorological processes and watershed characteristics in mountainous watersheds often result in large simulation errors. The analysis reported here relates monthly simulation error statistics to maximum achievable seasonal runoff forecast accuracy, presuming perfect knowledge of future (gage) precipitation and temperature, but without updating of model parameters or states. In some cases, this accuracy limit is less than that actually achievable using simpler models. The results suggest a preference for simple models if the coefficient of variation of monthly simulation error cannot be reduced below about 10–15%.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Anderson, E. A., “National Weather Service River Forecast System—Snow Accumulation and Ablation Model,” NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS HYDRO‐17, Nov., 1973.
2.
Burges, S. J., and Johnson, A. E., “Probabilistic Short Term River Yield Forecasts,” Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, ASCE, Vol. 99, No. IR2, June, 1973, pp. 143–155.
3.
Burnash, R. J. C., Ferral, R. L., and McGuire, R. A., “A Generalized Streamflow Simulation System, Conceptual Modeling for Digital Computers,” Technical Report, California Joint Federal‐State River Forecast Center, Sacramento, Calif., 1973.
4.
Carroll, T., “A Procedure to Incorporate Snow Course Data into the NWS Forecast System,” Proceedings, Modeling of Snow Cover Runoff, S. C. Colbeck and M. Ray, eds., US Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, N.H., Sept., 1978, pp. 351–358.
5.
Castruccio, P. A., et al. “Cost/Benefit Analysis for the Operational Applications of Satellite Snowcover Observations,” Operational Applications of Snowcover Observations, NASA Conference Publication No. 2116, A. Rango and R. Peterson, eds., 1980.
6.
Elliot, S. J., “An Evaluation of the Snow Survey and Water Supply Forecasting Program,” U.S. Soil Conservation Service, Program Evaluation Division, Feb., 1977.
7.
Gordon, W. R. and Lamb, R. C., “Importance of Water Supply Forecasts in Power Planning,” Proceedings, 48th Western Snow Conference, Laramie, Wyo., Apr., 1980, pp. 83–87.
8.
James, L. D., and Burges, S. J., “Selection, Calibration and Testing of Hydrologic Models,” Hydrologic Modeling of Small Watersheds, C. T. Haan, ed., American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 1982, p. 450.
9.
Lettenmaier, D. P., “Value of Snow Course Data in Forecasting Snowmelt Runoff,” Proceedings, Modeling of Snow Cover Runoff, S. C. Colbeck and M. Ray, eds., U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, N.H., Sept., 1978, pp. 44–45.
10.
Lettenmaier, D. P., and Burges, S. J., “Estimation of Flood Frequency Changes in the Toutle and Cowlitz River Basins Following the Eruption of Mt. St. Helens,” Technical Report No. 69, C. W. Harris Hydraulics Laboratory, Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash., Sept., 1981.
11.
Lettenmaier, D. P., Erickson, K. A., and Parkinson, D. B., “Evaluation of Snowmelt Forecasting Methods,” Technical Report No. 68, C. W. Harris Hydraulics Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash., Dec., 1980.
12.
Lettenmaier, D. P., and Waddle, T. J., “Forecasting Seasonal Snowmelt Runoff: A Summary of Experience with Two Models Applied to Three Cascade Mountain, Washington Drainages,” Technical Report No. 59, C. W. Harris Hydraulics Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash., Nov., 1978.
13.
Martinec, J., “Snowmelt—Runoff Model for Stream Flow Forecasts,” Nordic Hydrology, Vol. 6, 1975, pp. 145–154.
14.
Munro, J. C., “Direct Search Optimization in Mathematical Modeling and a Watershed Model Application,” NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS‐HYDRO 12, Office of Hydrology, National Weather Service, 1971.
15.
Peck, E. L., “Catchment Modeling and Initial Parameter Estimation for the National Weather Service River Forecast System,” NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS HYDRO‐31, Office of Hydrology, 1971.
16.
Tangborn, W. V., “Application of a New Hydrometeorological Streamflow Prediction Model,” Proceedings, 45th Western Snow Conference, Albuquerque, N.M., Apr., 1977, pp. 35–43.
17.
Twedt, T. M., Burnash, R. J. C., and Ferral, R. L., “Extended Streamflow Prediction During the California Drought,” Proceedings, 46th Western Snow Conference, Otter Crest, Oreg., Apr., 1978, pp. 92–96.
18.
Twedt, T. M., Schaake, J. C., Jr., and Peck, E. L., “National Weather Service Extended Streamflow Prediction,” Proceedings, 45th Western Snow Conference, Albuquerque, N.M., Apr., 1977, pp. 52–57.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 110 • Issue 3 • July 1984
Pages: 255 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1984
Published in print: Jul 1984
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.