Economic Feasibility of Flood Control Improvements
Publication: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume 109, Issue 1
Abstract
Although severe flooding problems continue to occur throughout the nation, economic justification of flood control improvements is becoming increasingly more difficult. Reasons for the difficulties in formulating economically feasible structural plans of improvement include increases in discount rate, greater reliance on nonstructural measures, cost escalations, environmental quality considerations, and the lengthy time required between study initiation and actual implementation. Decreasing benefit‐to‐cost ratios should be an important consideration in formulating water policy, particularly in regard to reassessing the role of the economic criterion in determining project justification, verifying that the discount rate formula appropriately represents the public interest, and developing procedures to expedite the water resources development process. In regard to project planning, the increasing difficulty in justifying flood control projects contributes to the need for more innovative plans incorporating a broader range of measure types and combinations, expanded evaluation and tradeoff analysis techniques, and improved capabilities for handling the uncertainties involved in an economic analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
“A Unified National Program for Flood Plain Management,” Water Resources Council, Washington, D.C., July, 1976.
2.
“A Unified National Program for Managing Flood Losses,” House Document No. 465, Task Force on Federal Flood Control Policy, 89th Congress, 2nd Session, Aug., 1966.
3.
“EC 1110‐2‐179 Engineering and Design Cost,” Corps of Engineers, July 29.
4.
Goddard, James E., “The Nation's Increasing Vulnerability to Flood Catastrophe,” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, Mar.–Apr., 1976.
5.
James, L. Douglas, and Lee, Robert R., Economics of Water Resources Planning, McGraw‐Hill Book Co., Inc., 1971.
6.
Krutilla, John V., “An Economic Approach to Coping with Flood Damage,” Water Resources Research, Vol. 2, No. 2, Second Quarter, 1966.
7.
“Policies, Standards, and Procedures in the Formulation, Evaluation, and Review of Plans for Use and Development of Water and Related Land Resources,” Senate Document 97, 87th Congress, 2nd Session, May, 1962.
8.
“Principles and Standards for Water and Related Land Resources Planning,” Water Resources Council, Federal Register, Vol. 38, No. 174, Sept. 10, 1973,
revised, Federal Register, Vol. 44, No. 242, Dec. 14, 1979,
revised, Federal Register, Vol. 45, No. 190, Sept. 29, 1980.
9.
Public Law 93‐251, The Water Resources Development Act of 1974, Mar. 7, 1974.
10.
Senate Bill 1241, 96th Congress, 1st Session, Introduced by Senators Domenici and Moynihan and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works, May 24, 1979.
11.
Senate Bill 3170, 96th Congress, 2nd Session, Introduced by Senators Domenici and Moynihan and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works, Sept. 30, 1980.
12.
Senate Bill 621, 97th Congress, 1st Session, Introduced by Senators Domenici and Moynihan and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works, Mar. 4, 1981.
13.
“Water and Related Land Resources Planning: Extension of Comment Period on Proposed Repeal of Regulations and Request for Comment on New Principles and Guidelines,” Water Resources Council, Federal Register, Vol. 47, No. 55, Mar., 1982.
14.
“Water Policies for the Future,” National Water Commission, Washington, D.C., June, 1973.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1983
Published in print: Jan 1983
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.