Roughness Model Accounting for Heterogeneity Based on In-Service Pavement Performance Data
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 136, Issue 3
Abstract
Deterioration modeling is a key component in a transportation infrastructure management system. It serves to capture and predict the performance of a facility. A sound deterioration model should incorporate: (1) relevant variables that affect deterioration process; (2) physical principle that reflects deterioration mechanism; and (3) rigorous statistical approach to estimating the model. This paper addresses these critical aspects with particular focus on highway pavements. Data collected from in-service pavement sections as part of the Minnesota Road Test project are used to capture the real-world pavement deterioration process. A number of variables involved in the system are thoroughly investigated, which include pavement design, materials, traffic, environment, and maintenance factors. Performance uncertainty due to unobserved heterogeneity is incorporated in the proposed model. The unobserved heterogeneity stems primarily from variability in the materials and the construction process. The model is estimated through maximum simulated likelihood estimation. It is demonstrated that the results are consistent with observations and engineering judgment in the context of pavement design and performance. In addition to population-level parameters representing the general deterioration mechanism, section-specific or individual-level parameters are obtained through Bayesian approach. The two levels of parameters can be used to accommodate network- and project-level analysis in pavement management.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers express their sincere thanks to MnRoad Project personnel for providing the data set in this study. Mr. Ben Worel, who has been a strong supporter of the research in the area of deterioration modeling, is recognized in particular.
References
AASHTO. (1993). AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures, AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
Archilla, A. R. (2006). “Repeated measurement data analysis in pavement deterioration modeling.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 12(3), 163–173.
Archilla, A. R., and Madanat, S. M. (2000). “Development of pavement rutting model by combining data from different experimental sources.” J. Transp. Eng., 126(4), 291–299.
Garcia Diaz, A., and Riggins, M. (1984). “Serviceability and distress methodology for predicting pavement performance.” Transportation Research Record. 997, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 56–61.
Greene, W. (2002). Econometric analysis, 5th Ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Greene, W. (2004). “Interpreting estimated parameters and measuring individual heterogeneity in random coefficient models.” Working paper, Department of Economics, New York University.
Hajivassiliou, V. A., and Rudd, P. A. (1994). “Classical estimation methods for LDV models using simulation.” Handbook of econometrics, R. F. Engle and D. L. McFadden, eds., Elsevier, The Netherlands.
Hass, R., Hudson, W. R., and Zaniewski, J. (1994). Modern pavement management, Krieger, Malabar, Fla.
Hong, F., and Prozzi, J. A. (2006). “Estimation of pavement deterioration using Bayesian approach.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 12(2), 77–86.
Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of panel data, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Huang, Y. H. (2004). Pavement analysis and design, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Minnesota DOT. (2002). 2002 Mn/Road Hot-Mix Asphalt Mainline Test Cell Condition Rep., Office of Materials and Road Research, ⟨http://www.mrr.dot.state.mn.us/research/mnroad_project/mnroadonlinereports/2002_mnroad_hot_mix_asphalt_mainline_test_cell_condition_report.pdf⟩ (Jan. 10, 2006).
Minnesota DOT. (2006). Minnesota road research project homepage, ⟨http://www.mrr.dot.state.mn.us/research/MnROAD_Project/MnROADProject.asp⟩ (Jan. 10, 2006).
Onar, A., Thomas, F., Choubane, B., and Byron, T. (2006). “Statistical mixed effects models for evaluation and prediction of accelerated pavement testing results.” J. Transp. Eng., 132(10), 771–780.
Paterson, W. D. O. (1987). Road deterioration and maintenance effects: Models for planning and management, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Prozzi, J. A. (2001). “Modeling pavement performance by combining field and experimental data.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
Prozzi, J. A., and Madanat, S. M. (2003). “Incremental nonlinear model for predicting pavement serviceability.” J. Transp. Eng., 129(6), 635–641.
Rauhut, J. B., Lytton, R. L., Jordhal, P. R., and Kenis, W. J. (1983). “Damage functions for rutting, fatigue cracking and loss of serviceability in flexible pavements.” Transportation Research Record. 943, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1–9.
Small, K., Winston, C., and Evans, C. (1989). Road work: A new highway pricing and investment policy, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: May 8, 2007
Accepted: Oct 26, 2009
Published online: Feb 12, 2010
Published in print: Mar 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.