Comparison of Methods for Defining Geographical Connectivity for Variables of Trip Generation Models
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 135, Issue 7
Abstract
The four-step procedure for travel demand modeling is ubiquitously used in the United States and elsewhere due to institutional and financial requirements. Trip generation analysis, which is the first step, is based on traffic analysis zones which are geographical units. Therefore, the zonal trip generation totals are observations measured at different geographical locations. Spatial distribution of the observations limits the methods that can be applied in analyzing the data and influences the final conclusions that can be reached. Most past efforts of incorporating spatial effects in trip generation models have been using contiguity of the zones as the major criterion for defining spatial relationship of the observations. In this study, we tested for the presence of spatial autocorrelation in both trip attraction and trip production variables. We found significant spatial autocorrelation in trip attraction variables but insignificant spatial autocorrelation in trip production variables for the data collected from the Las Vegas valley. We evaluated four alternative methods for defining geographical connectivity: (1) contiguity, (2) separation, (3) combined contiguity and separation, and (4) economic linkage (accessibility measure). Comparison of the trip attraction model indicated that the model estimated using geographical connectivity matrix with elements defined by separation (distance between centroids of the zones) was the best fitted. A further comparison indicated that this model outperformed the one without spatial variables by minimizing deviation of the modeled trips from observed trips. We recommend using separation between the zones to define spatial connectivity as opposed to contiguity only. Contiguity only excludes zones that may have an impact on the observation under consideration.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics, methods and models, Kluwer Academic, Boston.
Bento, A. M., Maureen, L. C., Ahmed, M. M., and Katja, V. (2005). “The effects of urban spatial structure on travel demand in the United States.” Rev. Econ. Stat., 87(3), 466–478.
Clark County Department of Comprehensive Planning. (1996). July 1996 population estimate for Clark County incorporated cities and unincorporated towns, Las Vegas.
Cliff, A. D., and Ord, J. K. (1981). Spatial processes: Models and applications, Pion Limited, London.
Doubleday, C. (1977). “Some studies of the temporal stability of person trip generation models.” Transportation Research Record. 11, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 255–263.
Gamas, J. A., Anderson, W. P., and Pastor, C. (2006). “Estimation of trip generation in Mexico City using spatial effects and urban densities.” Travel analysis methods (CD-ROM), Transportation Research Board, National Academies, Washington, D.C.
Geary, R. C. (1954). “The contiguity ratio and statistical mapping.” The Incorporated Statistician, Vol. 5, Blackwell, Oxford, U.K., 115–145.
Greene, W. H. (1997). Econometric analysis, 3rd Ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Griffith, D. A. (1996). “Some guidelines for specifying the geographic weight matrix in spatial statistical models.” Practical handbook of spatial statistics, Chap. 4, S. Arlinghaus, ed., CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.
Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic econometrics, 4th Ed., Mc-Graw-Hill, Singapore.
Haining, R. (2003). Spatial data analysis: Theory and practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Handy, S. (1993). “Regional versus local accessibility: Implications for nonwork travel.” Transportation Research Record. 1400, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 58–66.
Jacobson, J. (1982). “Alternative specifications of the random disturbances for trip frequency models.” Transp. Res., Part A, 16A(3), 219–223.
Kennedy, P. (2003). A guide to econometrics, 5th Ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Kockelman, K. M. (1997). “Travel behavior as a function of accessibility, land use mixing, and land use balance: Evidence from San Francisco Bay Area.” Transportation Research Record. 1607, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 116–125.
Koenig, J. G. (1980). “Indicators of urban accessibility: Theory and application.” Transportation, Vol. 9, Elsevier, The Netherlands 145–172.
McNally, M. G. (2000). “The four step model.” Handbook of transport modelling, 1st Ed., D. A. Hensher and K. J. Button, eds., Elsevier Science, Kidlington, Oxford, U.K.
Meurs, H. (1990). “Dynamic analysis of trip generation.” Transp. Res., Part A, 24A(6), 427–442.
Meyer, M. D., and Miller, E. J. (2001). Urban transportation planning: A decision-oriented approach, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Moran, P. A. P. (1948). “The interpretation of statistical maps.” J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.), 10(2), 243–251.
Ortŭzar, J., and Willumsen, L. G. (2001). Modelling transport., Wiley, West Sussex, U.K.
Pindyck, R. S., and Rubinfeld, D. L. (1998). Econometric models and economic forecasting, 4th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Pooler, J. A. (1995). “The use of spatial separation in the measurement of transportation accessibility.” Transp. Res., Part A: Policy Pract., 29A(6), 421–427.
Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC). (1998). “1996 Las Vegas valley household travel survey.” Final Rep. Prepared by Applied Management and Planning Group, and Parsons Brinckerhoff, Q & D, Inc., Las Vegas
Stetzer, F. (1982). “Specifying weights in spatial forecasting models: The results of some experiments.” Envir. Plan. A, 14, 571–584.
Stewart, J. Q., and Warntz, W. (1958). “Physics of population distribution.” J. Regional Sci., 1, 99–123.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 135 • Issue 7 • July 2009
Pages: 454 - 466
Copyright
© 2009 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 9, 2008
Accepted: Dec 8, 2008
Published online: Jun 15, 2009
Published in print: Jul 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.