TECHNICAL PAPERS
Feb 1, 2008

Influence of Restricted Sight Distances on Permitted Left-Turn Operation at Signalized Intersections

Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 134, Issue 2

Abstract

Adequate sight distance is an important factor needed to provide safe and efficient operation of left-turn movements at signalized intersections. This factor becomes more crucial for left turners attempting this maneuver during the permitted phase of the traffic signal. The large size median of the major road is commonly designed to accommodate an exclusive left-turn lane. However, studies have proved that if the median of that major road is relatively wide, the simultaneously turning vehicles in the opposite left-turn lanes often restrict driver’s sight distances for each other. In this study, a field observation was conducted to analyze the changes of left-turn gap acceptance parameters associated with drivers’ restricted sight distances. Theoretical models were developed and used to quantify the negative effect of the restricted sight problem on the left-turn capacity. The results show that the sight-distance problem may contribute to significant increments of the critical gap and follow-up time. This influence on driver’s gap-acceptance behavior may result in a 70% reduction in the left-turn capacity when the opposing-through traffic volume increases up to 1,800vehiclesh . The capacity reduction rate increases with the increase in both the opposing-through traffic volume and the volume-to-capacity ratio of the opposing left-turn traffic.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AASHTO. (2001). A policy on geometric design of highways and streets, Washington, D.C.
Abou-Henaidy, M., Teply, S., and Hunt, J. D. (1994). “Gap Acceptance Investigations in Canada.” Proc., 2nd Intersections Based on Reserve Capacities, Int. Symp. on Highway Capacity, Vol. 1, Australian Road Research Board—Transportation Research Board, Melbourne, Australia, 1–20.
Adebisi, O. (1982). “Driver gap acceptance phenomena.” Transp. Engrg. J., 108(6), 676–688.
Alexander, J., Barham, P., and Black, I. (2002). “Factors influencing the probability of an incident at a junction: Results from an interactive driving simulator.” Accid. Anal Prev., 34, 779–792.
Bonneson, J. A., and Fitts, J. W. (1995). “Traffic data collection using video-based systems.” Transportation Research Record. 1477, Transportation Research, Board, Washington, D.C., 31–40.
Brilon, W. (1995). Methods for measuring critical gap, Ruhr-University Press, Bochum, Germany.
Cassidy, M. J., Madanat, S. M., Wang, M.-H., and Yang, F. (1995). “Unsignalized intersection capacity and level of service: Revisiting critical gap.” Transportation Research Record. 1484, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 16–23.
Cooper, P. J., and Zheng, Y. (2002). “Turning gap acceptance decision-making: the impact of driver distraction.” J. Safety Res., 33, 321–335.
David, N. A., and Norman, J. R. (1979). “Motor vehicle accidents in relation to geometric and traffic features of highway intersections: Volume II; Research report.” Publication No. FHWA-RD-76–129, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Easa, S. M., Ali, M. Z. A., and Dabbour, E. (2005). “Offsetting opposing left-turn lanes for intersections on horizontal curves.” J. Transp. Eng., 131(11), 835–842.
Fitzpatrick, K. (1991). “Gaps accepted at stop-controlled intersections.” Transportation Research Record. 1303, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 103–112.
Harwood, D., Mason, J., Brydia, R., Pietrucha, M. T., and Gittings, G. L. (1996). “Intersection sight distance.” NCHRP Rep. No. 383, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Harwood, D., Pietrucha, M. T., Woodldridge, M. D., Brydia, R., and Fitzpatrick, K. (1995). “Median intersection design.” NCHRP Rep. No. 375, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Joshua, S. C., and Saka, A. A. (1992). “Mitigation of sight-distance problem of unprotected left-turning traffic at intersections.” Transportation Research Record. 1356, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 73–79.
Kyte, M., et al. (1996). “Capacity and level of service at unsignalized intersections.” Final Rep. Volume 1-Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, D.C.
Kyte, M., Kittelson, W., Tian, Z., Brilon, W., Troutbeck, R., and Mir, S. (1994). “New measurements for saturation headways and critical gaps at stop-controlled intersections.” Proc., 2nd Int. Symp. on Highway Capacityat Sydney, Austrialian Road Research Board, Melbourne, Australia, 345–364.
Kyte, M., Zegeer, J., and Lall, K. B. (1991). “Empirical models for estimating capacity and delay at stop-controlled intersections in the United States.” Intersection without Signals II, Proc., Int. Workshop, New York, 335–361.
Lieu, H., Gartner, N., Messer, C. J., and Rathi, A. K. (1999). Traffic flow theory, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Maher, M. J., and Dowse, R. J. (1983). “Estimating parameters in models of gap acceptance by queues.” Traffic Eng. Control, 24, 252–258.
McCoy, P. T., Navarro, U. R., and Witt, W. E. (1992). “Guidelines for offsetting opposing left-turn lanes on four-lane divided roadways.” Transportation Research Record. 1356, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 28–36.
Melcher, D. J. (2003). “Comprehensive methodology for evaluating sight distance for major road left turns.” Proc., Institute of Transportation Engineers 2003 Annual Meeting and Exhibit, Seattle.
Miller, A. J. (1972). “Nine estimators for gap-acceptance parameters.” Proc., Int. Symp. on the Theory of Traffic Flow and Transportation, Berkeley, Calif., Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Saka, A. (1998). “Effect of dynamic sight-distance problem on unprotected left-turn movement capacity.” J. Transp. Eng., 124(3), 223–228.
Siegloch, W. (1973). Die leistungsermittlung an knotenpunkten ohne lichtsignalsteuerung (capacity calculations for unsignalized intersections), Vol. 154, Schriftenreihe Strassenbau und Strassenver-kehrstechnik, Germany.
Tian, Z., et al. (1999). “Implenting the maximum likelihood methodology to measure a driver’s critical gap.” Transp. Res., Part A: Policy Pract., 33(3–4), 187–197.
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2000). Highway capacity manual (HCM), National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Troutbeck, R. J. (1992). “Estimating the critical acceptance gap from traffic movements.” Physical Infrastructure Center Rep., Queensland Univ. of Technology, Queensland, Australia.
Yan, X., and Radwan, E. (2004). “Geometric models to calculate intersection sight distance for unprotected left-turn traffic.” Transportation Research Record. 1523, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 46–53.
Yan, X., Radwan, E., and Birriel, E. (2006). “Geometric models to calculate left-turn sight distance for signalized intersections on horizontal curves.” J. Transp. Eng., 132(9), 683–690.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Transportation Engineering
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 134Issue 2February 2008
Pages: 68 - 76

History

Received: Feb 21, 2006
Accepted: Aug 15, 2007
Published online: Feb 1, 2008
Published in print: Feb 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Xuedong Yan, Ph.D. [email protected]
Research Assistant Professor, Center for Transportation Research, Univ. of Tennessee, 309 Conference Center Bldg., Knoxville, TN 37996-4133. E-mail: [email protected]
Essam Radwan, Ph.D., F.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Professor and CATSS Executive Director, Center for Advanced Transportation Systems Simulation, Univ. of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816-2450 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share