Evaluation of Transition Methods of the 170E and 2070 ATC Traffic Controllers after Emergency Vehicle Preemption
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 134, Issue 10
Abstract
Modern traffic signal control systems provide emergency vehicle preemption (EVP) capabilities using advanced sensors and communication technologies. While EVP strategies have been widely implemented by urban transportation management agencies, few research efforts have studied the transition methods employed after EVP operations. This paper presents comprehensive evaluations of EVP transition operations, considering both exit phase control and transition methods under three different traffic volume conditions. The research employed hardware-in-the-loop simulation, which provides a more realistic evaluation environment because it incorporates actual signal controllers into the simulation. The evaluation results at a coordinated-actuated signalized intersections in Northern Virginia indicated that: (1) performance measures varied significantly depending on the EVP transition methods; (2) shortway in the 170E controller and smooth in the 2070 ATC controller generally outperformed the other transition methods; and (3) the use of exit phases—available in the 2070 ATC controller—provided significant benefits over the 170E controller.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers thank Northern Virginia VDOT personnel for their support during data collection and for providing information on existing EVP strategies.
References
Best, M. (2007). “Evaluation of traffic controller algorithms after emergency vehicle preemption.” MS thesis, Univ. of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va.
BI Tran Systems, Inc. (1994). Model 170E controller traffic signal program 233 VA, Sacramento, Calif.
BI Tran Systems, Inc. (2000). QuicLoad user’s manual, Sacramento, Calif.
Cohen, D., Head, L., and Shelby, S. G. (2007). “Performance analysis of coordinated traffic signals during transition.” Proc., 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Econolite Control Products, Inc. (2004). ASC/2070 software programming manual, Econolite Control Products, Inc., Anaheim, Calif.
Mann, P. S. (2004). Introductory statistics, Minitab 14 manual, 5th Ed., Wiley, New York.
McCain/NIATT. (2002). Controller interface device (CID II): User’s manual, version 2.0, McCain Traffic Supply, Vista, Calif.
Nelson, E. J., and Bullock, D. (2000). “Impact of emergency vehicle preemption on signalized corridor operation: An evaluation.” Transportation Research Record. 1727, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 1–11.
Obenberger, J., and Collura, J. (2001). “Transition strategies to exit preemption control: State-of-the-practice assessment.” Transportation Research Record. 1748, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 72–79.
Obenberger, J., and Collura, J. (2007). “Using software-in-the-loop simulation methodology to evaluate traffic signal transition strategies employed to exit preemption control.” Proc., 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Park, B., and Qi, H. (2005). “Development and evaluation of simulation model calibration procedure.” Transportation Research Record. 1934, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 208–217.
Park, B., Won, J., and Yun, I. (2006). “Application of microscopic simulation model calibration and validation procedure: A case study of coordinated actuated signal system.” Transportation Research Record. 1978, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 113–122.
Park, B., Yun, I., and Best, M. (2006). “Evaluation of emergency vehicle preemption strategies on a coordinated actuated signal system using hardware-in-the-loop simulation.” Draft Rep., Center for Transportation Studies, Univ. of Virginia, Blacksburg, Va.
Park, B., Yun, I., and Best, M. (2007). “Evaluation of pre-emption and transition strategies for Northern Virginia smart traffic signal systems (NVSTSS).” Final Draft Rep., Virginia Transportation Research Council, Va.
Planung Transport Verkehr AG. (2005). VISSIM 4.10 user’s manual, Berlin.
Shelby, S. G., Bullock, D., and Gettman, D. (2006). “Transition methods in traffic signal control.” Transportation Research Record. 1978, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 130–140.
Yun, I., Best, M., and Park, B. (2007). “Evaluation of emergency vehicle preemption strategies on a coordinated actuated signal system using hardware-in-the-loop simulation.” Proc., 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 134 • Issue 10 • October 2008
Pages: 423 - 431
Copyright
© 2008 ASCE.
History
Received: Jun 29, 2007
Accepted: Jun 6, 2008
Published online: Oct 1, 2008
Published in print: Oct 2008
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.