Modeling and Simulation of Collisions of Heavy Trucks with Concrete Barriers
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering
Volume 133, Issue 8
Abstract
On-site collision tests of full-scale concrete barriers are an important method to understand what happens to concrete barriers when vehicles collide with them. However, such tests require both time and money, so modeling and simulation of collisions by computer have been developed as an alternative in this research. First, spring subgrade models were developed to formulate the ground boundary of concrete barriers based on previous experiments. Then, the finite element method models were developed for both heavy trucks and concrete barriers to simulate their dynamic collision performances. Comparison of the results generated from computer simulations and on-site experiments demonstrates that the developed models can be applied to simulate the collision of heavy trucks with concrete barriers, to replicate the movement of the truck at the collision, and to investigate the performance of the concrete barriers. The developed research methodology can be widely used to support the design of new concrete barriers and the safety analysis of existing ones.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
Many thanks are due to Mr. Kazuhiro Ando in the Public Works Research Institute of Japan for proving the full-scale experiment data and commenting on the computer simulation. The partial financial support of the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture in Japan as the Foundation of Science Research (No. 11555124) is gratefully acknowledged. The writers would like to thank three anonymous referees for their helpful suggestions and corrections on earlier drafts of the paper.
References
Atahan, A., Bligh, R., and Ross, H. (2002). “Evaluation of recycled content guardrail posts.” J. Transp. Eng., 128(2), 156–166.
Bank, L., Yin, J., and Gentry, R. (1998). “Pendulum impact tests on steel W-beam guardrails.” J. Transp. Eng., 124(4), 319–325.
Beason, W., Ross, H., Perera, H., and Marek, M. (1991). “Single-slope concrete median barrier.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1302, 11–23.
Bischoff, P., and Perry, H. (1991). “Compressive behaviors of concrete at high strain rates.” Mater. Struct., 24(6), 425–450.
El-Tawil, S., Severino, E., and Fonseca, P. (2005). “Vehicle collision with bridge piers.” J. Bridge Eng., 10(3), 345–353.
Georgin, J., and Reynouard, J. (2003). “Modeling of structures subjected to impact: Concrete behavior under high strain rate.” Cem. Concr. Compos., 25(1), 131–143.
Hallquist, J. (1999). LS-DYNA user’s manual (version 950), Livermore Software Technology Corporation, The Japan Research Institute LTD, Tokyo, Japan (in Japanese).
Itoh, Y., and Liu, C. (1999). “Design and analysis of steel guard fences.” Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Steel and Space Structure, Keynote Lecture, Singapore, 29–42.
Itoh, Y., Liu, C., and Usami, K. (2001). “Nonlinear collision analysis of heavy trucks onto steel highway guard fences.” Struct. Eng. Mech., 12(5), 541–558.
Itoh, Y., Ohno, T., and Liu, C. (1999). “Behavior of steel piers subjected to vehicle collision impact.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Steel and Aluminum Structures, Espoo, Finland, 821–828.
Itoh, Y., Usami, K., Sugie, M., and Liu, C. (2000). “Numerical analysis on impact performance of steel and aluminum alloy bridge guard fences.” Structures under Shock and Impact VI, Boston, 385–394.
Japan Road Association (JRA). (1999). Design specifications of road safety barriers, Maruzen Press, Tokyo (in Japanese).
Kusama, R. (2004). “Study on numerical collision analysis for performance-based design of guard fences.” Master thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Nagoya Univ., Nagoya, Japan (in Japanese).
Li, Q., and Meng, H. (2003). “About the dynamic strength enhancement of concrete-like materials in a split Hopkinson pressure bar test.” Int. J. Solids Struct., 40(2), 343–360.
McDevitt, C. (2000). “Basics of concrete barriers.” Process Eng., 63(5), 10–14.
Public Works Research Institute (PWRI). (1998). “A study on the concrete barriers for high-speed collision.” Research Rep. No. 207, Tsukuba, Japan (in Japanese).
Reid, J., Rohde, J., and Sicking, D. (2002). “Box-beam bursting energy absorbing terminal.” J. Transp. Eng., 128(3), 287–294.
Roschke, P., Bligh, R., and Pruski, K. (1995). “Commingled plastic guardrail post.” J. Transp. Eng., 121(2), 201–213.
Soroushian, P., Choi, K., and Alhamad, A. (1986). “Dynamic constitutive behavior of concrete.” ACI J., 83(2), 251–259.
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (1993). “Recommended procedures for the safety performance evaluation of highway features.” NCHRP Rep. No. 350, Washington, D.C.
Wiles, E., Bronstad, M., and Kimball, C. (1977). “Evaluation of concrete safety shapes by crash tests with heavy vehicles.” Transp. Res. Rec., 631, 87–91.
Yamaguchi, H., and Fujimoto, K. (1989). “Strain rate effects on dynamic response of reinforced concrete slabs under impact loadings.” J. Struct. Constr. Eng., 406, 25–35 (in Japanese).
Zheng, S., Häussler-Combe, U., and Eibl, J. (1999). “New approach to strain rate sensitivity of concrete in compression.” J. Eng. Mech., 125(12), 1403–1410.
Zielinski, A., Reinhardt, H., and Kormeling, H. (1981). “Experiments on concrete under uniaxial impact tensile loading.” Mater. Constr. (Paris), 14(2), 103–112.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Sep 27, 2005
Accepted: Oct 31, 2006
Published online: Aug 1, 2007
Published in print: Aug 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.